richardkemp
05-01-2006, 11:51 PM
Hey all. I currently have a BlueAngel (O2 XDA IIs), and though I am very happy with what it does, I'm not keen on its horrible instability. Therefore, I was thinking of upgrading to the Universal.
However, if I did so I would ideally wish to use WM 2003 SE for program compaitibility, and to avoid the notorious memory leak. Will this pose a huge great problem? I'm thinking that the memory management is different so WM2003 might not know how to deal with the Universal's ROM/RAM combination.
Also I suppose, I would need a WM2003 ROM for the Universal, which doesnt exist I guess?
Final thing, how sturdy is the hinge between the two parts of the Universal? I've heard (and to a small extent seen for myself) that the sliding mechanism of the BA is a bit fragile...
Just a collection of my thoughts really. If anyone has anything to add about the merits or lack of in the Universal, please feel free to let me know.
However, if I did so I would ideally wish to use WM 2003 SE for program compaitibility, and to avoid the notorious memory leak. Will this pose a huge great problem? I'm thinking that the memory management is different so WM2003 might not know how to deal with the Universal's ROM/RAM combination.
Also I suppose, I would need a WM2003 ROM for the Universal, which doesnt exist I guess?
Final thing, how sturdy is the hinge between the two parts of the Universal? I've heard (and to a small extent seen for myself) that the sliding mechanism of the BA is a bit fragile...
Just a collection of my thoughts really. If anyone has anything to add about the merits or lack of in the Universal, please feel free to let me know.