View Full Version : Feedback : 2003 SE vs 2005
Zarlator
12th December 2006, 11:51 AM
What are the real gains to upragde an "old" 400 MHz Himalya 2003 SE to a WM2005 ?
Speed ? MP3 Ringtones ? Compatibliy ? Stability ?
Anyone who could give me a piece of advise, it will be a great help.
Kap6oHaT
13th December 2006, 07:56 AM
WM5 - slower, but nice graphics and comfortable using with one thumb.
IMHO
ariyani
28th December 2006, 01:31 PM
argh!! people i need help! fast! :( i have an i-mate PPC phone edition and its running on wm2003... i need an upgrade to 2003SE or wm5 but i dunno how to do it... pls help me...
double_ofour
28th December 2006, 06:10 PM
You need to use the search function of this forum..
Or if you need a real time helper contact me through Yahoo Messenger
Dr Gonzo
29th December 2006, 05:57 PM
I went for c_shekar's WM5 and I have to admit I love it. Just for the better camera software - I lost the zoom but gained an edit/rotate function. And the auto-correct is pretty good for low light pics. And the soft buttons are great. It took a while to get used to some things being in different places, but overall I'm extremely impressed.
_OfureHHbIi_LjupkyJIb
9th January 2007, 06:54 PM
WM5 On the last AKU 3.5 best, at me never so quickly the device did not work...
mach2005
9th January 2007, 07:28 PM
What are the real gains to upragde an "old" 400 MHz Himalya 2003 SE to a WM2005 ?
Speed ? MP3 Ringtones ? Compatibliy ? Stability ?
Anyone who could give me a piece of advise, it will be a great help.
I like the fact that an empty battery doesn't wipe out the memory (Storage).
(if you don't install your programs in ram)
Gr. Mach2005
obaz
29th August 2007, 07:28 AM
at fact now.
everybody use ram-disk - so you still can loose your data.
as for me - i choose wm5 because of better IE an SPB Mobile shell.
it little more slowest and buggy then wm03se, but it not so bad at all.
Rudegar
29th August 2007, 09:40 AM
if one copy the content pf ramdisk to a sdcard and copy it back if data is lost and softreset then one all is well
"better ie" sounds a bit like an oxymoron :P
earth12345
30th August 2007, 12:41 PM
Speed: 2003SE Faster because programs work on ram not rom like 2005.(It's old device, I not serious when it's hang but sometime it will hang)
MP3 Ringtones/Polyphonic Midi: 2003SE and 2005 MP3 Ringtone ummm... not serious for me but polyphonic ringtone, sound of instrument is different with 2003/2003SE (I use same midi files to test.)
Compatibliy: 2005 is newer. I answer 2005.
Stability: 2005 AKU 3.5 is better than 2003SE
Phone: When I use 2003SE OS My girlfriend tell me about sometimes she call me but it have waiting tone but I didn't hear it.
When I use 2005 I not heard about somebody can call me and my device not wakeup when somebody calling me.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.