BatteryMeter or OMAPClock

[AD10]

Hi Guys,

Pretty impressed with this site, the dedication and commitment everyone here has.

Just thought to pick minds....

Which is better of the 2 clocking apps : OMAP (of which I could only find ver 0.2) or BatteryMeter , gives the best overall performance vis installation file size and continous use ?

Your thoughts please

AD10

[hanmin]

I think they are the same thing, BatteryMeter provides the nice user friendlier interface that invoke OMAP (or you mean OmapClock?). For small size, OMAP is a command line simple tweak etc, but maybe difficult to set up, esp if you want it to be still around after suspending your phone. So, probably for start, try the Bmeter.

[grun]

Don't you mean BatteryStatus instead of BatteryMeter?

Anyway, BatteryStatus, despite the name, has also overclocking features and has the advantage that the settings remains if you perform a reset. As far as I know, Omapclock does not.

[triplex]

I think they are the same thing, BatteryMeter provides the nice user friendlier interface that invoke OMAP (or you mean OmapClock?). For small size, OMAP is a command line simple tweak etc, but maybe difficult to set up, esp if you want it to be still around after suspending your phone. So, probably for start, try the Bmeter.

here's the helper
http://www.nicque.com/PQz/OmapClockPlus.htm

[AD10]

Thanks guys,

Yes I meant BatteryStatus and OMAPClock.

I have tried both, and stuck to BatteryStatus - offers more information and seems to be constantly supported by Kai.

[ecolive]

I used OMAPCLOCK to set the clock to 208 MHZ, however batterystaus, even not using its overclock function reads it as 221 MHZ instead.

Which one to trust???
Tks

:confused:

[palmbluetooth]

I used OMAP for a while, but I was able to overclock max 246, now I use batterystatus and I OC to 286 without any problem. (Also BS has many more features over OMAP)