mUn vs LVSW WM6 rom

[Aero]

Hi, anyone know the difference between the 2 rom in its initial release?


Thanks

[Antimus]

They're both working beta versions, both have bugs, maybe not the same ones but still bugs.

Unless you want to bugtest the ROMs, leave it for a week or so for the next versions to come out.

These are not ROMS you want to flash if you're looking for a stable replacement for WM5, therefore if you're asking which is best, the answer is, neither, at the moment.

If you want to know the differences, read through the threads for each one and see what problems people are having with them.

[racerx_]

well, there's a lot of differences here and there.

Mun's rom is a higher version of WM6, and includes some stuff (office 2007 compatibility) that LVSW's doesn't. Of course LVSW's has some tools and apps that Mun's doesn't have. Haha.. It's pretty tough to compare them.

I will say this, I found Mun's ROM to be a bit faster in terms of bringing up new programs/windows. I dunno if that has anything to do with his customization or just the version of WM6. However right now a lot of people (including me) are having trouble using activesync with this version. I switched to LVSW and am syncing fine now.

There's some other issues here and there regarding VOIP and stuff that separate them...

hope it helps. As always, for comprehensive info, you need to go read the posts..

[xplode]

Well my opinion is that this thread is pointless, try thrm both and you will find out which one fits your needs, thats all, it is not a hard task

[jpless]

so if active sync works in one and not in the other how about some combined work?

[ZakMcRofl]

How about waiting until a stable release comes out. I mean wtf, it has been a little over a day and people already want the perfect ROM.

Tweaking a ROM takes a lot of effort. Its not always that easy to locate problems and even if you do, they are not always easy to fix.

Give it a few weeks or wait for an official ROM if you can't deal with a few bugs here and there.

[FuzzMunky]

Who is complaining? I think you are misreading peoples intentions here by criticising the ROMs. It is in essence part of the testing process that you give feedback and also desire to solve the issues.

Noone is expecting the perfect ROM, but if you dont want the perfect the ROM then what is the point in developing?

[ZakMcRofl]

I didn't quote anyone so I refered to the previous post by jpless.
Maybe I misread it but he made it sound like it was as easy as putting feature A from ROM1 into ROM2.
Its possible for some parts but could introduce a lot more new bugs.

I'm sure mun_rus and LVSW are well aware of each others Roms, it just takes time to evolve it to the state WM5 is in today. Especially since we don't have an official WM6 Rom.

Sorry for my harsh tone earlier. In time, we'll have a perfect WM6 Rom.

[namphet]

:) I take them both.
Mun's ROM so Quickly :)
LVSW was able to sync :)

Thanks a lot both MUN/LVSW .:)

[mun_rus]

@ZakMcRofl
Thanx for comments. You are absolutly right.

Just wait for next release. I have to test new rom before and should say that:
-AS sync - OK
-GPS camera - ok
-etc

I have no chance t otry videocall, so don't know anything about it

[mikesol]

I'm waiting for the second betas to come out, and I think I'll jump on Mr. Mun_Rus's rom because, well, I sent him money, so I might as well use the results of that, right?

[FuzzMunky]

In the name of healthy competition, I declare that I find mUn's ROM the better of the two after careful evaluation. So im going to go back to mUn's ROM for now. Faster and less buggy camera-wise. :) Maybe you are tired of this now, but thanks again to both you and lvsw for your work.

[jpless]

I didn't quote anyone so I refered to the previous post by jpless.
Maybe I misread it but he made it sound like it was as easy as putting feature A from ROM1 into ROM2.
Its possible for some parts but could introduce a lot more new bugs.

I'm sure mun_rus and LVSW are well aware of each others Roms, it just takes time to evolve it to the state WM5 is in today. Especially since we don't have an official WM6 Rom.

Sorry for my harsh tone earlier. In time, we'll have a perfect WM6 Rom.

You didn't quote but referred? Anywho I know it's not as easy as it sounds, just thought that maybe by comparing the bugs in either one we could maybe help solve some of them or something :) Just trying to help here...

[ZakMcRofl]

Usually its considered bad style to quote the person right before you since it takes up board space and is the default reference point anyways.
The problem with the bugs is that you can't always pinpoint them to a single file or module, otherwise what you say would be possible (replace the file from other ROM).
A Rom error can come from a file, a registry entry or combinations of the former. Obviously having a comparison base can help but its obvious that LVSW and mun_rus already use it plenty - check their WM5 AKU 3.5.x Roms for example.

[djfuego]

In all the roms I've tried, Mun was the very first I tried, and although I don't use it any more, It was the most stable, IE I didn't soft reset it unless an installation wanted me to, it never crashed on me.

[racerx_]

dude... the last post on this thread was in 2007...

happy new year :D

[liamhere]

Well my opinion is that this thread is pointless, try thrm both and you will find out which one fits your needs, thats all, it is not a hard task

yes it is a pointless thread... play with them to find which is best for you :rolleyes:

[dta1974]

To me the best version is windows CE,do some research and install it,it'll make your xda rock or maybe brick :-)