NOOB Question: How do i know a fake rom?

[SilverSamurai]

i have downloaded many ROMS... Helmi's, Xplode's, PDAViet's...

how can you say it is a fake rom?
i've seen it many times in the thread.

Please clarify for us NOOBS.

Thanks.

[SilverSamurai]

anybody? Senior Members?
any tips?

[blues01]

What do you mean? AFAIK if you find the roms from this forum, than they are real.

[LGSilva]

Fake roms were something when we were at wm5 and some people created roms with wisbar integrated and would say that it was wm6.
But right now that is not a problem anymore, well, not until wm7 ;)

[SilverSamurai]

What do you mean? AFAIK if you find the roms from this forum, than they are real.

then im sorry too if you dont know it...
and if you dont read posts after downloading ROMs.
i'll let you do that... now that you have an idea. *this is a tip*

Fake roms were something when we were at wm5 and some people created roms with wisbar integrated and would say that it was wm6.
But right now that is not a problem anymore, well, not until wm7 ;)

So this is a matter of the Core OS in which the rom is built.
Now i get it. (slightly)
What i still dont get is how people determine that it's a fake?
or they just want to sabotage that person's reputation?

I think, BEFORE we say that something is a fake ROM,
we should come up with the PROOF(S) then POST IT on that thread
other than blurting out such misaligned typo known as the word "FAKE"
with no corresponding evidence.

As much as we, the users(including the leechers) are concerned,
we pretty much... well... like to know if this is a solid ROM to use.
reading "This is a fake" doesnt make it much solid, does it?

There are words like modified, enhanced, patched, fixed... to describe such ROMs.

ok... im slurring out words now...
i'll let it rest for now. and if i see another fake post...
i'll just ask the poster.
Then i'll ask him to add his knowledge to this thread.

:D

[SilverSamurai]

hmm... i read some post in here that they say that it's only
the "misleading" name...

actually... Realism isnt just the "if it works.."
... it's "how it works..." and really ... "the work" itself

The Naming Convention is there to build Order.

To Monitor Progress.

Faking a rom release naming convention means only 2 things.

1) they want to say that theirs is superior than the lower release.
(no one can determine this, since all are dependent on what we install
and if you have a changelog to support this then this is welcome)

2) they just want to prove that they can change the version release.
(airbags)?

Naming conventions are there to monitor progress... or bugs.
jumping so many numbers and without saying it's a major
version change and without a proof, other than
"ADDING EYE CANDIES"
is like having a visual transpormation pack added to an OS.

Are you saying they've jumped that so many numbers
without a long list of change log?
c'mon... i know im not the only one who's curious on
what was tampered with to make it fast.

if this is done only for credits then it's useless to monitor changes...
pity are the would be kitchendevelopers/chefs who would lack the version number to hold on to...

================================================== ===
.... we are satisfied with some of the "ROM" makers...
.... and we always ending up with Compliments to the "Chef"...
.... you guys are good...
.... but one request.... Order in the Kitchen Please!


:D