AP4 Review / Round-up

[Carty]

Based on the posts made here already, I have made a review/round up on this ROM. You can read it here (http://pocketpc-live.com/top-stories/ap4-is-finally-out.html).

Any suggestions guys?

Regards,
Carty..

[cmonex]

Any suggestions guys?



do not claim anything that isn't even your own experience

for example you copypasted this bullshit from another forum post (and which post I've already answered):


"Flashing:
A completely un-documented process. The PocketPC flashed with this tool will literaly be the worst PocketPC in the world (at-aleast at the moment)
1) no warranty, no way to go back
2) the only ROM available are AP3 and AP4. None can put a new ROM on it!
3) no official ROMs anymore
4) no "self cooked" ROMs anymore"

[sergiopi]

do not claim anything that isn't even your own experience

for example you copypasted this bullshit from another forum post (and which post I've already answered):


"Flashing:
A completely un-documented process. The PocketPC flashed with this tool will literaly be the worst PocketPC in the world (at-aleast at the moment)
1) no warranty, no way to go back
2) the only ROM available are AP3 and AP4. None can put a new ROM on it!
3) no official ROMs anymore
4) no "self cooked" ROMs anymore"


The bullshit was mine :) but Carty, I've put a SMILEY at the end!
Without smiley is to too "strong" for the Team Effort! To be honest and without using the smiley the complete concept is "It was anxiously awaited and the TEAM released a quick first ROM , but some things are still in developing stage
.....
.....
.....

Delelopers are working to address the problems ,and if you want to have more informations or give your contribution: forum.xda-developers.com, ATHENA section. Now the AP4 flashing process is explained, and CMONEX told us they are releasing the tool to go back!

Carty please, we are on INTERNET, do you remember? Hypertext, WWW, LINKS....

Give the bullshit to the bullshit owners :D and give to the TEAM the space they deserve for their hard work!
This is a developers forum and they are developing and supporting their ROM. In any case I will suggest to add value to you article, giving some LINKS to the readers!

[Confucious]

I was just about to quote sergiopi's reply Thank you, for the complete answer and the really interesting schedule
He had some questions which were valid from a developers point and not from and end users point of view. The Olinex has answered these points and you have quoted them out of context and without the smiley which, as he points out, completely changes the meaning of the quotes. You also have tried to make it look like they are your comments and the whole point of this thread seems to be to get more visitors to a website no one has heard of or cares about. Go back to your day job and stop talking cr*p.

[docraj]

Based on the posts made here already, I have made a review/round up on this ROM. ..

Though you have mentioned here that this "review" is a round-up of existing posts in these forums, in the actual article you have given the impression that these views are yours. That is incorrect.

A good way of giving credit to the original authors is to clearly state the author's handle and put his/her observations in double quotes. e.g. you could have stated as follows:

As observed by Serigiopi (a senior member of the xda-developer forum)
"Flashing:
A completely un-documented process. The PocketPC flashed with this tool will literaly be the worst PocketPC in the world (at-aleast at the moment)
1) no warranty, no way to go back
2) the only ROM available are AP3 and AP4. None can put a new ROM on it!
3) no official ROMs anymore
4) no "self cooked" ROMs anymore"

Last but not the least, do not change any words or smileys in quoted text as that can convey a different impression to what the author intended (as it has done in this case).

[Carty]

Ok, no offense guys, Ive taken that part completely...

Regards,
Carty..