Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

[KERNEL] [4.2.x] [GSM/LTE/CDMA] ⇒☆007☆ v3.7.1

OP ogdobber

21st April 2012, 09:00 AM   |  #1171  
mike216's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag cleveland
Thanks Meter: 1,069
 
5,043 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2010
More
Here I am right now this kernel is f*+*king insane!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	uploadfromtaptalk1334991618518.jpg
Views:	208
Size:	69.0 KB
ID:	1016743  
21st April 2012, 09:00 AM   |  #1172  
@rbiter's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 964
 
4,134 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike216

I wanted to get OGS permission before posting his work and I'm sure your not new to flashing and don't mind going back in recovery for it! OG also included his suggested UV to it! I'm now at around 86% with 48 minutes of screen on time! This would be right of the charger so at this rate I'm on track to blow away 5+ hours of screen on time (wifi)

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium

i was breaking your balls. i saw that earlier. i need the 1.4ghz. my phone can run it. i wanna try 1.5 but i don't see anybody has it. i do see 1.8 has been broke.
The Following User Says Thank You to @rbiter For This Useful Post: [ View ]
21st April 2012, 10:14 AM   |  #1173  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 13
 
914 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2007
More
Hi there, any plans for further enhancement to the current kernel version?
The Following User Says Thank You to bryant_16 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
21st April 2012, 05:44 PM   |  #1174  
ogdobber's Avatar
OP Recognized Developer
Thanks Meter: 1,813
 
3,256 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2008
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by @rbiter

i was breaking your balls. i saw that earlier. i need the 1.4ghz. my phone can run it. i wanna try 1.5 but i don't see anybody has it. i do see 1.8 has been broke.

1.8 only recommended for people living in Antarctica

Quote:
Originally Posted by bryant_16

Hi there, any plans for further enhancement to the current kernel version?

whoops I hit thanks instead of reply. But yes, I am always testing things. I post test kernels on twitter...up to version 3.1.8. Nothing is worthy of a release yet...
The Following User Says Thank You to ogdobber For This Useful Post: [ View ]
21st April 2012, 06:48 PM   |  #1175  
mike216's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag cleveland
Thanks Meter: 1,069
 
5,043 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2010
More
I can't use my phone for 5 hours straight but I'm consistently on it for an hour or so. Even better results last night

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	uploadfromtaptalk1335026900987.jpg
Views:	123
Size:	69.0 KB
ID:	1017398  
21st April 2012, 06:54 PM   |  #1176  
nazrin313's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 70
 
524 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike216

I can't use my phone for 5 hours straight but I'm consistently on it for an hour or so. Even better results last night

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Omg!! Dats craaazy...are u on the stock battery? Or extended..u on wifi? Or mobile data? How many apps do u have installed?


I can never get that sorta performance..max screen time before my batt died was 3h24mins. (On mob data 100%)
21st April 2012, 07:15 PM   |  #1177  
@rbiter's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 964
 
4,134 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by ogdobber

1.8 only recommended for people living in Antarctica



whoops I hit thanks instead of reply. But yes, I am always testing things. I post test kernels on twitter...up to version 3.1.8. Nothing is worthy of a release yet...


I definitely don't need 1.8, especially the heat it creates. Have you tried the touch wake mod, og? I think that would benefit some users in battery. We could set screen off 15 seconds and lock 15 seconds or so after screen off. When using phone away from home, distractions distract from phone and it ends up timing out and then I have to unlock. 15 second screen off is too fast. If touch wake mod is incorporated into your battery mizer kernel we could tweak that for better battery savings when we forget to manually lock phone.

bow chicka wow wow.
21st April 2012, 07:19 PM   |  #1178  
mike216's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag cleveland
Thanks Meter: 1,069
 
5,043 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2010
More
+1 I love the touckwake mod
But I will say by touckwake preventing the phone from deep sleep it will depending on the time set delay some so if the user sets a high time battery will take a hit

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Last edited by mike216; 21st April 2012 at 07:25 PM.
21st April 2012, 07:22 PM   |  #1179  
mike216's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag cleveland
Thanks Meter: 1,069
 
5,043 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by nazrin313

Omg!! Dats craaazy...are u on the stock battery? Or extended..u on wifi? Or mobile data? How many apps do u have installed?


I can never get that sorta performance..max screen time before my batt died was 3h24mins. (On mob data 100%)

Stock Verizon battery about 133 apps and this was all wifi. One day when I have time I want to see what this beast can do over 5-6 hours. Everyday before work I walk my dogs around 40 minutes and usually don't loose 1% while listening to music. Pretty good kernel!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
The Following User Says Thank You to mike216 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
21st April 2012, 07:24 PM   |  #1180  
@rbiter's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 964
 
4,134 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike216

I can't use my phone for 5 hours straight but I'm consistently on it for an hour or so. Even better results last night

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Lol. I get about 12% per hour drain on wifi. About 14-18% per hour when I have good cell signal. When at work, I lose 15-25% per hour, but it mostly ~20%+. I am fixing to try some tweaks to my setcpu profiles, frequencies and trying aggressive voltages again. My uv's are slightly aggressive now and I know I can go lower. 4.0.2 had a bug, or didn't like uv's when I plugged 3.5mm jack in. The higher my 350 voltage the less reboots I had. I haven't had one reboot since .4 update so I gonna tweak my voltages again. Running 825, 925, 1025, 1125 and 1200mv respectively. I can go lower on my 350, 700 and 920 frequencies. My 1200 voltage is about as low as I can go, but I will see if it can go lower since I am on .4 now and not getting any kind of reboots whatsoever.

bow chicka wow wow.

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes