Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

[REF] [RADIO] [GSM] Galaxy Nexus GT-i9250 Baseband Collection & Discussion

OP osm0sis

23rd April 2012, 01:25 AM   |  #501  
steve.garon's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Ottawa, On
Thanks Meter: 641
 
1,018 posts
Join Date:Joined: Apr 2010
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmanUV

ABSOLUTELY YES.
A leak is not a official radio that goes through QC and whatnot. There could be critical bugs that prevented it from being released publicly.
I'm not saying this radio is bad or particularly buggy, and there seems to be little QC when it comes to gnexus, but an official radio is still more encouraging.

The official radio is available on Google's official stock firmware web site. Download the stock firmware zip file, extract the radio and flash it using flashboot...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
23rd April 2012, 01:29 AM   |  #502  
efrant's Avatar
Senior Moderator
Flag Montreal Bow2DaCow
Thanks Meter: 8,191
 
9,595 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2009
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmanUV

ABSOLUTELY YES.
A leak is not a official radio that goes through QC and whatnot. There could be critical bugs that prevented it from being released publicly.
I'm not saying this radio is bad or particularly buggy, and there seems to be little QC when it comes to gnexus, but an official radio is still more encouraging.

The thing is, it is NOT a leak. It just happens to be an OTA that was only pushed out to a limited number of devices. That does not make it a leak.
23rd April 2012, 01:45 AM   |  #503  
ArmanUV's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 222
 
825 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2012
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve.garon

The official radio is available on Google's official stock firmware web site. Download the stock firmware zip file, extract the radio and flash it using flashboot...

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

what? Nobody asked for official radio here. we're talking about how ugcl1 was only pushed to 1 person and therefore it may be better to stay on ugla4.
And google stock radios are intended for europe. It's recommended that north american users stay on the UGXXX radios.
23rd April 2012, 01:53 AM   |  #504  
efrant's Avatar
Senior Moderator
Flag Montreal Bow2DaCow
Thanks Meter: 8,191
 
9,595 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2009
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmanUV

what? Nobody asked for official radio here. we're talking about how ugcl1 was only pushed to 1 person and therefore it may be better to stay on ugla4.
And google stock radios are intended for europe. It's recommended that north american users stay on the UGXXX radios.

I think you are making a lot of assumptions there.

Saying that it was only pushed to one person (just because only one person on XDA had reported receiving it) is a pretty big assumption if you'd ask me.

Secondly, have you disassembled the radios to see what makes the UG radios for N.A., different from the XX radios for Europe, and makes you say that those in N.A. should stay on UG and those in Europe should stay on XX? I certainly haven't, but what I can tell you is that in real world performance, I have not noticed any difference WHATSOEVER between all the radios that I've tried: XXKK6, UGKK7, UGKL1, XXLA2, UGLA4.
23rd April 2012, 05:39 AM   |  #505  
ArmanUV's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 222
 
825 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2012
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by efrant

I think you are making a lot of assumptions there.

Saying that it was only pushed to one person (just because only one person on XDA had reported receiving it) is a pretty big assumption if you'd ask me.

Secondly, have you disassembled the radios to see what makes the UG radios for N.A., different from the XX radios for Europe, and makes you say that those in N.A. should stay on UG and those in Europe should stay on XX? I certainly haven't, but what I can tell you is that in real world performance, I have not noticed any difference WHATSOEVER between all the radios that I've tried: XXKK6, UGKK7, UGKL1, XXLA2, UGLA4.

You're right that it may not be just 1 person, but it certainly wasn't a full blown deployment. Otherwise, we would have heard from at least a few other people, and not just on xda.
And yes radios are closed source and nobody knows what the difference is. I said it's RECOMMENDED to use UG radios in NA. It seems logical that they didn't go through the trouble of naming it differently if it was identical to XX radios. It also seems logical that canadian careers optimized the radio for their network.

In NA, the difference between UGKK7, UGKL1, UGLA4 and UGLC1 is *probably* very small and mostly related to bug fixes for drops/battery/etc and not data speed. However, there has to be a difference otherwise they wouldn't go through the trouble of releasing new versions.
23rd April 2012, 07:28 AM   |  #506  
pcphobic's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 431
 
1,538 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2010
Anybody have the radio from latest build IMM761?
http://www.android-advice.com/2012/u...imm761-update/

23rd April 2012, 10:51 AM   |  #507  
Timmyfoxeh's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 104
 
180 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcphobic

http://www.android-advice.com/2012/u...imm761-update/

IMM76I didn't include a new radio, that's the same XXLA2 from the initial ICL53F 4.0.4 update.
23rd April 2012, 02:52 PM   |  #508  
efrant's Avatar
Senior Moderator
Flag Montreal Bow2DaCow
Thanks Meter: 8,191
 
9,595 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2009
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmanUV

[snip]

I said it's RECOMMENDED to use UG radios in NA.

Although I have never seen that from Google or Samsung, let's take it as true for the moment. Looking at an analogy, Volkswagen recommends that I use a certain type of oil in my R32. If I use a different oil, say a synthetic blend, which actually performs better, does it makes sense to use the recommended oil?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmanUV

It seems logical that they didn't go through the trouble of naming it differently if it was identical to XX radios.

You'd be surprised what companies do. Years ago, Black & Decker put out a "new" line of "professional-grade" tools. Turns out they were the exact same B&D tools, just a different color plastic and different name. It was made public; big scandal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmanUV

It also seems logical that canadian careers optimized the radio for their network.

This seems possible, but I have yet to see any difference between UG and XX.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmanUV

In NA, the difference between UGKK7, UGKL1, UGLA4 and UGLC1 is *probably* very small and mostly related to bug fixes for drops/battery/etc and not data speed.

Assuming that it is "very small", then does it really matter?
The Following User Says Thank You to efrant For This Useful Post: [ View ]
23rd April 2012, 03:01 PM   |  #509  
Theshawty's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 4,564
 
1010
15,740 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2011
More
This is my input, if anyone bothers to read.

http://***********************/instanc...x/19227394.jpg
23rd April 2012, 05:50 PM   |  #510  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 6
 
171 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jul 2007
i'm still on 4.0.2, if i upgrade to 4.0.4 will my radio baseband be automatically updated?

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread

Tags
baseband, cwm, fastboot, gsm, hspa, i9250, maguro, radio
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes