Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

Samsung reportedly selected again for next Nexus...

OP onthecouchagain

26th April 2012, 02:14 AM   |  #81  
adrynalyne's Avatar
Recognized Developer
Thanks Meter: 5,723
 
9,715 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razer(x)

I'm talking about hardware, not software. Saying it's not worse it's just a lie.

The only thing better in the Gnex is the HD screen.

What an ignorant response. It isn't worse, it is different. If you haven't figured that out by research, then you are uninformed and should move on.


Not everyone judges their life by a benchmark, but then some do. This phone is not for those people.
Last edited by adrynalyne; 26th April 2012 at 02:21 AM.
26th April 2012, 02:23 AM   |  #82  
Hemlocke's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Amarillo
Thanks Meter: 185
 
1,362 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2011
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrynalyne

LOL...you talk of superior build quality then try to justify its flaws because you don't "need" it.

Did I ever say metal is superior? Better quality material, EXCEPT in a device filled with transmitters.

Sent from my HTC One X using xda premium
26th April 2012, 02:23 AM   |  #83  
Razer(x)'s Avatar
Recognized Themer
Flag Bologna
Thanks Meter: 4,780
 
7,163 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2010
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrynalyne

What an ignorant response. It isn't worse, it is different. If you haven't figured that out by research, then you are uninformed and should move on.


Not everyone judges their life by a benchmark, but then some do. This phone is not for those people.

I'm not an asshole or something who's trying to troll. I've owned a SGS2 for almost an year, and i can read the specs.

Ok, you can say "Nexus has better community support, Google updates and co." and i'm ok with that, that's why i bought a Gnex. But you can't really tell its hardware it's not worse, even considering it came out 6 months later than SGS2.
26th April 2012, 02:26 AM   |  #84  
adrynalyne's Avatar
Recognized Developer
Thanks Meter: 5,723
 
9,715 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razer(x)

I'm not an asshole or something who's trying to troll. I've owned a SGS2 for almost an year, and i can read the specs.

Ok, you can say "Nexus has better community support, Google updates and co." and i'm ok with that, that's why i bought a Gnex. But you can't really tell its hardware it's not worse, even considering it came out 6 months later than SGS2.

Like I said, uninformed.


Stop playing the benchmark and spec game. It is old, and only increases the e-member. What are you going to do to prove me wrong? Pull out some benchmarks?


Go ahead. Then go look on the net where our GPU beats the Mali in some tests. Like I said, not worse...different.
The Following User Says Thank You to adrynalyne For This Useful Post: [ View ]
26th April 2012, 02:27 AM   |  #85  
Ravynmagi's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 200
 
1,051 posts
Join Date:Joined: Nov 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razer(x)

Samsung is a very good hardware manufacturer, but seems like they're fooling us with these Nexus phones.

I can't understand how a phone released 6 months later can be worse than the SGS2, and that happened with SGS1 also.

I'm not saying i want a powerful hardware or something, but atleast the same as SGS2 (anybody said 8mpx camera vs 5mpx?)

I'm not sure if it's entirely Samsung's fault. GS2 has the Exynos SoC while the Galaxy Nexus is a TI OMAP4, I assume this is one of the points were you mean the GS2 is better.

But it seems Google wanted the TI OMAP4 to be the official processor for ICS, or at least first optimized for ICS. So the Galaxy Nexus had to use that processor. Maybe also because it's compatible with LTE and Exynos isn't.

Though have no idea why they gimped the camera (fortunately that wasn't important for me).
The Following User Says Thank You to Ravynmagi For This Useful Post: [ View ]
26th April 2012, 02:32 AM   |  #86  
Razer(x)'s Avatar
Recognized Themer
Flag Bologna
Thanks Meter: 4,780
 
7,163 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2010
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrynalyne

Like I said, uninformed.


Stop playing the benchmark and spec game. It is old, and only increases the e-member. What are you going to do to prove me wrong? Pull out some benchmarks?


Go ahead. Then go look on the net where our GPU beats the Mali in some tests. Like I said, not worse...different.

Seems like you can't get my point.

Peace bro
26th April 2012, 02:45 AM   |  #87  
@rbiter's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 964
 
4,132 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razer(x)

I'm not an asshole or something who's trying to troll. I've owned a SGS2 for almost an year, and i can read the specs.

Ok, you can say "Nexus has better community support, Google updates and co." and i'm ok with that, that's why i bought a Gnex. But you can't really tell its hardware it's not worse, even considering it came out 6 months later than SGS2.

Better yet, to add to adrynalynes post, go look at the note forum where the Mali lags with HD resolution. Played with a note finally the other day and let's just say imagination ftw!

sent with 3g courage. better recognize. 4g courage coming soon. stock up on diapers.
26th April 2012, 02:46 AM   |  #88  
MS.'s Avatar
Senior Member
www
Thanks Meter: 212
 
588 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by onthecouchagain

http://www.phonearena.com/news/Samsu....again_id29469

Good news man! GNex kept me happy for about 4 months (and still counts) which is unusual for me, so i'm really looking forward into next Nexus phone by Samsung.
26th April 2012, 02:46 AM   |  #89  
efrant's Avatar
Senior Moderator
Flag Montreal Bow2DaCow
Thanks Meter: 8,229
 
9,619 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2009
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razer(x)

Seems like you can't get my point.

Peace bro

What i think adrynalyne is trying to say is that pure hardware specs don't mean anything. You could have a hex-a-core-twin-turbo-intercooled-super-snapdragon-tegra-omap, but if there is no software optimized for it, there's no much point. Who cares if the benchmark is 3x the GNex if it loads a web page in the same amount of time? It's more of a "my junk is bigger/better/faster than your junk" thing, not much more.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to efrant For This Useful Post: [ View ]
26th April 2012, 02:48 AM   |  #90  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 46
 
243 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jul 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravynmagi

Though have no idea why they gimped the camera (fortunately that wasn't important for me).

Could have something to do with their desire for a super snappy camera. Fewer MP means less data to process. Doesn't explain why the sensor characteristics were so bad though.

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes