MultiROM Makes its Way Over to the HTC One (M8)

While browsing our forum, you will undoubtedly find more than a few enticing ROMs available … more

Welcome to the New XDA-Developers Portal!

You may recall that a few weeks ago, we opened up the XDA-2015 forum themesto intrepid users … more

An Android Enthusiast’s Apple iPhone 6 Challenge

The media has gone batty again over Apple “revolutionizing” smartphones. … more

Sony to Extend its AOSP Program to Other Devices

Sony will be offering its users the possibility to use AOSP ROMs as an alternative to the … more
Post Reply

I9100, I9101 and I9103

30th May 2011, 07:02 PM   |  #1  
OP Member
Thanks Meter: 4
 
88 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2011
There are Galaxy S II variants for International market. I9101 is NFC-enabled while I9103 is Tegra 2-based. So, which one will get the most of the development here? It's soooo important for me. I see that Galaxy SL has very little attention from devs. So, I don't want to be on a loser's side. Or is it not gonna be like Galaxy S/SL?
The Following User Says Thank You to mawardi For This Useful Post: [ View ]
30th May 2011, 07:09 PM   |  #2  
Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
46 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2009
I think active contributors are also early users, the i9100 should be a good base. Anyway, the nfc ver. is very similar. The tegra based will be less followed I think.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
30th May 2011, 09:03 PM   |  #3  
Senior Member
Flag Hamad Town
Thanks Meter: 32
 
220 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2011
More
I think that developers will focus more on the I9100 as its the first version to get release in the UK. the NFC version shouldn't be that much of a difference the tegra 2 will get less attention.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawardi

There are Galaxy S II variants for International market. I9101 is NFC-enabled while I9103 is Tegra 2-based. So, which one will get the most of the development here? It's soooo important for me. I see that Galaxy SL has very little attention from devs. So, I don't want to be on a loser's side. Or is it not gonna be like Galaxy S/SL?

30th May 2011, 09:37 PM   |  #4  
HumanoidTalking's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Doha
Thanks Meter: 173
 
562 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2010
More
Technically NFC is only difference between I9100 and I9101, so same development can be applied.. for Tegra 2 version, all CPU development will be bit different.. Gamer lovers will like tigra 2(though I9100 is better for all non-Tegra games).. most Devs are into Roms, themes, root, overclock.. so for me I9100 is safe bet

Quote:
Originally Posted by mawardi

There are Galaxy S II variants for International market. I9101 is NFC-enabled while I9103 is Tegra 2-based. So, which one will get the most of the development here? It's soooo important for me. I see that Galaxy SL has very little attention from devs. So, I don't want to be on a loser's side. Or is it not gonna be like Galaxy S/SL?

30th May 2011, 11:36 PM   |  #5  
Sleepycat3's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 74
 
524 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark_Lord0122

I think that developers will focus more on the I9100 as its the first version to get release in the UK. the NFC version shouldn't be that much of a difference the tegra 2 will get less attention.

The I9103 with its Tegra 2 chip should run existing software that is tailored for Tegra 2. Since there is huge backing behind Tegra 2, the I9103 is not really getting less attention.
31st May 2011, 12:55 AM   |  #6  
Recognized Developer
Thanks Meter: 313
 
1,190 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2010
Donate to Me
since many "tegra" games already run on the i9100, and that the exynos is so much faster, tegra is like, bleh.
also the tegra version is a super lcd i think?
31st May 2011, 02:35 AM   |  #7  
Sleepycat3's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 74
 
524 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilboa1

since many "tegra" games already run on the i9100, and that the exynos is so much faster, tegra is like, bleh.
also the tegra version is a super lcd i think?

"Many" refers mostly to the Gameloft games. There are many other 3D games out there that the exynos can't run. I'd say "handful" instead.
31st May 2011, 06:29 AM   |  #8  
BlueScreenJunky's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 24
 
250 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2010
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleepycat3

"Many" refers mostly to the Gameloft games. There are many other 3D games out there that the exynos can't run. I'd say "handful" instead.

errr, nope, Gameloft has never done any "Tegra 2 only" games that I'm aware of, so all their games will probably be updated to support Exynos eventually.
I think "many" referred to the games which are supposed to run only on Tegra 2 devices like Samurai Revenge 2 HD, Pinball HD, or Guerilla Bob THD, but which work perfectly on Exynos once you use the appropriate drivers, proving that the "Tegra 2 optimised" is just marketting and a software lock.

Just wanted to make that clear, but actually I agree that most games will probably be optimised for Tegra 2 since it will be the most common platform. (Also Xperia play seems to have lots of games designed for it... I guess it's good news for those who are stuck on single core/Adreno 205 phones...)
2nd June 2011, 05:43 AM   |  #9  
OP Member
Thanks Meter: 4
 
88 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2011
I9101 is going to be powered by TI OMAP 4430 after all (source: GSMArena).
2nd June 2011, 05:53 AM   |  #10  
Mew178's Avatar
Junior Member
Flag Osijek
Thanks Meter: 2
 
28 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2011
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilboa1

since many "tegra" games already run on the i9100, and that the exynos is so much faster, tegra is like, bleh.
also the tegra version is a super lcd i think?

We in Croatia are getting the Tegra version and it does indeed have a Super Amoled+ diplay. Still it's only clocked at 1.0 Ghz compared to the 1.2 Ghz of the Exynos

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Top Threads in Galaxy S II General by ThreadRank