5,597,542 Members 31,649 Now Online
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum

[KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+[ICS/CM10] 6.0b5+[JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV!!!

Tip us?
 
Deni_NS
Old
#5771  
Deni_NS's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 713
Posts: 608
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Novi Sad
People stop feeding the troll. If you stop, he will stop.
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Deni_NS For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
jebuchanan
Old
#5772  
jebuchanan's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 777
Posts: 750
Join Date: May 2012
Default Re: [KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+/6.0b5+ [ICS][JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV Threa

Quote:
Originally Posted by robertobsc View Post
@Gokhanmoral , although ics support has been removed, are you planning to support in later versions?

Enviado de meu GT-I9100 usando o Tapatalk 2
Use version 5 or lower for ICS.

Signature
 
nutpants
Old
#5773  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 121
Posts: 602
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FV-british columbia
was the sgs2 i9100 exynos exploit patched in the last ics syiah kernal (v5.+)
or was there a patch produced for those who want to stay on ics and stay with syiah??
if not can we expect a fix?
 
jgcaap
Old
#5774  
jgcaap's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 523
Posts: 2,264
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Porto
Default Re: [KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+/6.0b5+ [ICS][JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV Threa

Quote:
Originally Posted by THE RED BLUR View Post
This is still not enough information man. You should know better by now. Coming from dorimanx thread as to what is required.

No information on :-

*Rom currently on

*How you installed.

*kernel settings

*Steps taken to trouble shoot.

Well judging by all this. Its user problem.

Use GS2KERNELWIPE (links in signature) and reflash kernel and stick to stock settings. And make sure supersu is installed and binary updated.

Case closed.

SIGNATURE
 


PHONE : SGSII
Sent via: Tapatalk
Main ROM: AllianceROM LSD beta
KERNEL : Siyah 6.0b5
(DEFAULT PROFILE AND SETTINGS )
MODEM : LS8
BATTERY : Stock 1650mAh
EXTERNAL Sdcard : Samsung Class 10 32gb
LAUNCHER : Apex
Root Manager : SuperSU 1.04

THE CAVE = My Guides list to install NeatRom and other ROMS and kernels on LSJ and LS8 + tools to have a bug free rom and kernel + how to back up and RESTORE ROM OM FULLY = http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=35923600

1.Current list of kernels on LSJ and pros and cons

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=36698607


2.Rom Nuke / Wipe scripts

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=36742265

3. GS2KERNELWIPE script

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=36742198

4.Fast Dormancy :

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=36396636

5. How to install full wipe with rom nuke on LSJ

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...php?p=36655790

I've formated the phone... Is working fine now.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
Galaxy S2 - Jelly Bean Leak
Kernel: Samsung

The Following User Says Thank You to jgcaap For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
cnjax
Old
#5775  
cnjax's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 10608
Posts: 2,605
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Default Re: [KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+/6.0b5+ [ICS][JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV Threa

Quote:
Originally Posted by nutpants View Post
was the sgs2 i9100 exynos exploit patched in the last ics syiah kernal (v5.+)
or was there a patch produced for those who want to stay on ics and stay with syiah??
if not can we expect a fix?
As of right now I do not think the ics kernel was patched. You can dl chainfires exynos exploit app from the store and check if your kernel is affected.

GT-I9100 powered by
NeatRom Lite 4.4
SiyahKernel 6.0b5+
JB Reloaded theme
Many40's battery tweaks
GT-I9100 powered by
NeatRom Lite 4.8
Apollo 4.7 V0
JB Reloaded + MYLR blue theme
The Following User Says Thank You to cnjax For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
rlorange
Old
#5776  
rlorange's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 1838
Posts: 3,804
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne
Default Re: [KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+/6.0b5+ [ICS][JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV Threa

Lol clearly in the OP thread title I have:

"[KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+/6.0b5+ [ICS][JB/CM10.1]"

Notice I have both versions with their corresponding compatibilities in [square brackets]?

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to rlorange For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
rlorange
Old
#5777  
rlorange's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 1838
Posts: 3,804
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne
Default Re: [KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+[ICS][CM10] 6.0b5+[JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV!

I've edited the title...

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to rlorange For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
rlorange
Old
#5778  
rlorange's Avatar
Senior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 1838
Posts: 3,804
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne
Default Re: [KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+[ICS/CM10] 6.0b5+[JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV!!

I will update the OP properly soon.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rlorange For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
gokhanmoral
Old
#5779  
gokhanmoral's Avatar
Senior Recognized Developer
Thanks Meter 25728
Posts: 3,744
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ankara

 
DONATE TO ME
it is a little unfair to expect people doing something for free and fun to do it very well documented and perfect.

I never claimed that my work was perfect. indeed, it is not. and I can live with that. also a lot of people can live with that and like it.

even samsung doesn't do it properly even though you have paid for their product. releasing defective chips, buggy kernels, no commit history, late or sometimes no release for the changes in the kernel (violating gpl), no documentation, no source to support opensource development...

yeah, I know, some users may flash the latest one on ICS (even on gingerbread, or on another S2 variant) and soft-brick their device. they will have to use odin and nobody should flash any kernels if they cannot take the risk.

so, dikidera: either you should stop flashing kernels, or I should stop making new ones.
wanna open a voting poll for it? :P
Current Device: Sony Xperia T
The Following 62 Users Say Thank You to gokhanmoral For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
 
bombaybadboy
Old
(Last edited by bombaybadboy; 21st February 2013 at 07:33 AM.)
#5780  
bombaybadboy's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Thanks Meter 16605
Posts: 7,087
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: wolverhampton
Default Re: [KERNEL][REF][Q&A] Siyah 5.0+[ICS/CM10] 6.0b5+[JB/CM10.1] +DISCUSSION+. NON-DEV!!

There is a reason everyone knows the name siyah, because it has always been the best. You have been away 2 months and already done more for our S2s in a few of days than others have in those months imo. Great work GM

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to bombaybadboy For This Useful Post: [ Click to Expand ]
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes