FORUMS

Samsung Galaxy S6 To Receive Major Camera Update

When the Samsung Galaxy S6 and S6 Edge were launched, they became the prime focus for … more

Tactile: An Addicting Game with Beautiful Material Design

The game industry has been around for decades, catering to a wide … more

Android’s Consistency and The User Experience

This is a site of power users, and it is fair to say that most of us are more … more

Which Manufacturer (And Device) Made You Choose Android?

The beautiful thing about Android is that there is so much to choose from. … more
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread Email Thread

Has lack of 3rd party "official roms" changed much?

9th July 2014, 08:10 PM |#11  
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 70
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lethargy

Google Play Edition devices aren't the same as Nexus devices, they just use a more "AOSP-like" ROM that doesn't have the respective OEM skin on top of it. Not sure if bootloader unlocking process is different (Nexus devices have fastboot oem unlock) but the stock ROM on them still has some parts of the OEM framework underneath (like double tap to wake and duo camera editing on HTC One M8). The Nexus 5 is more popular then Google Play Edition devices and which is why it subsequently has more developer support.

This makes sense. I didn't know if the Play Edition devices still had OEM fragments or if they were as free as the Nexus series.
 
 
9th July 2014, 08:17 PM |#12  
rootSU's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Oxenhope, West Yorkshire, UK
Thanks Meter: 17,669
 
More
Heavy oem frameworks

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
9th July 2014, 09:24 PM |#13  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 216
 
More
To be fair, there was a pretty significant gap between 4.2 releasing on the Nexus 4 and Cyanogenmod releasing 10.2 stable. As mentioned though, many of the ROMs have released stable versions and those that haven't are still fairly stable despite not having an "official" stable release.

I will say that I'm less likely to stick with a ROM despite bugs on Nexus devices than on other devices for two main reasons. With other devices, you're often getting rid of a manufacturer skin (so it's a completely different interface, instead of just having some tweaks) or you're moving up an Android version early.
9th July 2014, 09:31 PM |#14  
rootSU's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Oxenhope, West Yorkshire, UK
Thanks Meter: 17,669
 
More
Its worth pointing out that some devs only call their last ever release "stable" when they absolutely won't add or change anything again.

I think it's too easy to get wrapped up in the terminology and not appreciate the development we have

What a stable release means to 1 dev, means something else to another.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Last edited by rootSU; 9th July 2014 at 09:33 PM.
9th July 2014, 09:36 PM |#15  
simms22's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
BROOKLYN!
Thanks Meter: 24,281
 
More
nearly every single ROM that I've ever used that has been titled "stable", has been less stable then the regular builds. especially with cm. a real ROM is neither called " stable" nor "experimental", its just called by its name and released. people add the word "stable" to them just to trick a few into a few more downloads.
10th July 2014, 04:25 AM |#16  
JohnnyHempseed's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag South Jersey
Thanks Meter: 71
 
More
There number of quotation marks in here is too damn high.
10th July 2014, 06:50 AM |#17  
rootSU's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Oxenhope, West Yorkshire, UK
Thanks Meter: 17,669
 
More
For good reason...

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes