Sony Updates AOSP Sources to Android 5.0.1

Just a few days ago, Sony did an utterly fantastic job by pushing out numerous device trees for … more

Stop Your Screen From Turning Off with KeepItOn

We all know the feeling of reading a news article orrather longdocument, when our screen … more

The XDA LG QPair Developer Challenge Voting Has Begun!

It seems like it was just yesterday that weannounced that we had paired up with LGto … more

Major Update for the Sony Smartwatch 2 Brings DND and More

With the wearables landscape now dominated by Android Wear and Pebble, its … more

Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Thread Closed

New HTC Butterfly2 Camera is even better than M8

OP TheEndHK

19th August 2014, 05:21 PM   |  #1  
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 363
 
1,302 posts
Join Date:Joined: Apr 2011
http://www.eprice.com.hk/mobile/talk/4542/178742/1/
This is a first hand camera Hong Kong review of HTC Butterfly 2 and do a comparison with E8 and M8. It's real real surprised..... the 13M Duo, Imagechip 2.0, f/2.0 on B2 beats E8/M8 on ALL condition in terms of WB, exposure value, color and details! UltraPixel loss the fight even at low light. This HTC camera is very amazing!
19th August 2014, 05:37 PM   |  #2  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 240
 
1,304 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2010
More
Thumbs up
Good job at comparing 4 mpx with 13 mpx camera.
you certainly know which is better
The Following User Says Thank You to jags_the1 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
19th August 2014, 07:01 PM   |  #3  
redpoint73's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Thanks Meter: 3,360
 
7,739 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2007
There is no true low light test in this article; only a contrast lighting test (mixed high/low lighting). A night photo with bright neon lights is not low light.

Indoor with low artificial lighting, or outside without the big neon lights would be a better indication of whether the Ultrapixel is doing what its supposed to, or if the Butterfly 2 camera can still beat it out in low light.
19th August 2014, 08:13 PM   |  #4  
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 363
 
1,302 posts
Join Date:Joined: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by jags_the1

Good job at comparing 4 mpx with 13 mpx camera.
you certainly know which is better

That's not entirely true, beside the megapixel war the color, wb, exposure value is also much better as I already mentioned.
19th August 2014, 08:17 PM   |  #5  
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 363
 
1,302 posts
Join Date:Joined: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint73

There is no true low light test in this article; only a contrast lighting test (mixed high/low lighting). A night photo with bright neon lights is not low light.

Indoor with low artificial lighting, or outside without the big neon lights would be a better indication of whether the Ultrapixel is doing what its supposed to, or if the Butterfly 2 camera can still beat it out in low light.

That's not real true too. This test at general low light is enough for most conditions. If you ask for true low light test then probably it is just testing long exposure time combined with slow shutter, then M7 with OIS probably would be the real winner at the end.
19th August 2014, 08:53 PM   |  #6  
redpoint73's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Thanks Meter: 3,360
 
7,739 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEndHK

If you ask for true low light test then probably it is just testing long exposure time combined with slow shutter

Not necessarily. Larger pixels means you can potentially capture a better shot in low light with same shutter speed. At least that is the whole theory of the "Ultrapixel" camera. I personally don't see the "low light" test in the article as low light at all. Too much ambient light from the neon lights.

In any case, although the M8 shot is overexposed in the lighted window area, it captures a lot more detail in the darker areas, that shows up as completely dark on the other 2 devices. So its arguable either way which one is "better". In fact, the Butterfly 2 isn't capturing much at all in terms of "low light" its mostly just capturing the well-lit areas illuminated by huge neon lights. Hardly "general low light".
Last edited by redpoint73; 19th August 2014 at 08:56 PM.
19th August 2014, 09:28 PM   |  #7  
LenAsh's Avatar
Forum Moderator
Thanks Meter: 1,252
 
2,795 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2011
I think I'll bring this to a close now before we run away with ourselves.

Thanks to the OP for bringing the article to a wider audience and to those that have made their opinions available.

Thanks all

Thread Closed Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes