Attend XDA's Second Annual Developer Conference, XDA:DevCon 2014!
5,813,525 Members 39,974 Now Online
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum
Forgot your password?

About Me

  • About ryanbg
    Service provider
    U.S.A. - Verizon
    City
    Minnesota
    Home country
    United States
    Interests
    Hockey, Android, Golf
    Occupation
    Park Ranger

Statistics

Total Posts
General Information
  • Last Activity: Yesterday 11:27 PM
  • Last Login: 1st January 1970 12:00 AM
  • Join Date: 3rd January 2008
  • Referrals: 0

Friends

Showing Friends 1 to 1 of 1

Most Thanked

MOST THANKED POSTS
ThanksPost Summary
32 Just an update, surge and I were doing some reverse engineering yesterday on the new 4.4.2 aboot. We were able to understand the MODE: DEVELOPER mechanism a little better. The problem with reversing pseudo-code/Assembly is that it's essentially a ...
28 WARNING: This is very dangerous. I have been able to reproduce and recover every time, but there is a HUGE inherent risk of permabricking. I am able to manually put my device into QHSUSB_BULK mode by overwriting SDI/DBI with SBL1. The screen will ...
24 E:V:A We've been waiting for this for awhile. I/WSOMACP (21188): XCP_FEATURE_SECURITY: 4369 This appears to be the SECURE SECBOOT VAL (4369) from the Secure Boot status menu inside the Hidden Menu/RIL. On top of this it gets better. I made a ...
24 Well I figured there was a more technical explanation than the one I could come up with. And I know Surge and everyone in here are working on things that look Chinese to me, just wanted to share... You never know Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapat...
23 So after a day or two of some heavy reversing with a fresh mind and a second look with Surge1223 , we found some good stuff. I looked deeply into aboot and started looking at the MODE: Developer mechanism. I went through a series of checks and eve...