Total Posts
General Information
  • Join Date: 3rd January 2008
  • Referrals: 0

Most Thanked

Post Summary
Just an update, surge and I were doing some reverse engineering yesterday on the new 4.4.2 aboot. We were able to understand the MODE: DEVELOPER mechanism a little better. The problem with reversing pseudo-code/Assembly is that it's essentially a ...
WARNING: This is very dangerous. I have been able to reproduce and recover every time, but there is a HUGE inherent risk of permabricking. I am able to manually put my device into QHSUSB_BULK mode by overwriting SDI/DBI with SBL1. The screen will ...
E:V:A We've been waiting for this for awhile. I/WSOMACP (21188): XCP_FEATURE_SECURITY: 4369 This appears to be the SECURE SECBOOT VAL (4369) from the Secure Boot status menu inside the Hidden Menu/RIL. On top of this it gets better. I made a ...
Well I figured there was a more technical explanation than the one I could come up with. And I know Surge and everyone in here are working on things that look Chinese to me, just wanted to share... You never know Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapat...
So after a day or two of some heavy reversing with a fresh mind and a second look with Surge1223 , we found some good stuff. I looked deeply into aboot and started looking at the MODE: Developer mechanism. I went through a series of checks and eve...