FORUMS

[FTF] Sony Xperia Z Lollipop Release

Sony rolled out a Lollipop update for Xperia Z just yesterday. If you still haven’t gotten … more

Original Moto G Receives Lollipop, OTA Captured

The original Moto G was released almost two years ago. Motorola still continues to … more

Device Review: No.1 X1 Rugged Smartphone

We are almost at the end of Q2 for 2015, and we have seen most of the flagship phones for the … more

When a Friend or Family Member Asks for a Phone Recommendation, What Do You Tell Them?

The majority of us here at XDA would consider … more
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread Email Thread

Nexus S as compared to Galaxy SII :S

5th September 2011, 10:07 AM |#1  
suhas_sm's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Flag Mumbai
Thanks Meter: 83
 
More
Hi guys,

Galaxy SII blew away my senses with its performance. It is too slick. Do Benchmark softwares like quadrant have any significance ? Mine Nexus S shows a very high score but its not even half slick as SII Which ROMs should I try, if I am looking for a slick Rom. Or the hardware difference is of a significant matter here ?
 
 
5th September 2011, 12:01 PM |#2  
Neurotica's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag San Diego, CA
Thanks Meter: 106
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by suhas_sm

Hi guys,

Galaxy SII blew away my senses with its performance. It is too slick. Do Benchmark softwares like quadrant have any significance ? Mine Nexus S shows a very high score but its not even half slick as SII Which ROMs should I try, if I am looking for a slick Rom. Or the hardware difference is of a significant matter here ?

Go AOSP(CM7/MIUI) and then use a kernel that will allow you to over-clock the crap out of your NS. You might still not reach desired performance compare to a stock or even over-clocked S2.

You're trying to compare dual core to single core here, not to mention double the amount of RAM.
5th September 2011, 12:38 PM |#3  
Member
Thanks Meter: 2
 
More
Ive used my mates SII, its a great phone to be sure, but honestly in everyday usage terms theres almost nothing between them. Theres some factors i prefer about the SII, but none of them are really enough to make me wish i had one over my NS.

That may change with the arrival of the Nexus prime. However, ultimately everything becomes obsolete, thats why i purchased the NS, hopefully to avoid some of that. However, i do think that Google really should have made the NS a dual core device, even if it delayed it slightly.
5th September 2011, 01:40 PM |#4  
dario3040's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Oslo
Thanks Meter: 157
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rotellian

Ive used my mates SII, its a great phone to be sure, but honestly in everyday usage terms theres almost nothing between them. Theres some factors i prefer about the SII, but none of them are really enough to make me wish i had one over my NS.

That may change with the arrival of the Nexus prime. However, ultimately everything becomes obsolete, thats why i purchased the NS, hopefully to avoid some of that. However, i do think that Google really should have made the NS a dual core device, even if it delayed it slightly.

Google made a very good choice when they put the best single core processor available in the Nexus S.
There are barely any dual core socs that beat the samsung chip here.
And no, Tegra 2 does not beat it.
Both cores aren't even being used properly.
The Galaxy S II is barely any better than the Nexus S.
The Nexus Prime will probably rape both though.

Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
5th September 2011, 02:22 PM |#5  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 37
 
More
The Nexus S is a phone, whereas the Galaxy S II is a mini-tablet.
5th September 2011, 03:23 PM |#6  
shad0wboss's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Genève
Thanks Meter: 145
 
More
today i'm returning nexus s for galaxy s plus, is it a good deal?
5th September 2011, 03:53 PM |#7  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 93
 
More
If you like less power for more money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shad0wboss

today i'm returning nexus s for galaxy s plus, is it a good deal?



Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
5th September 2011, 04:22 PM |#8  
Senior Member
Flag Boston, MA
Thanks Meter: 182
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by dario3040

Google made a very good choice when they put the best single core processor available in the Nexus S.
There are barely any dual core socs that beat the samsung chip here.
And no, Tegra 2 does not beat it.
Both cores aren't even being used properly.
The Galaxy S II is barely any better than the Nexus S.
The Nexus Prime will probably rape both though.

Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App

This. Dual core is a waste in 2011. My ns4g is faster and more responsive than my friends dual core devices.(plus I have almost 300mb available ram)

Sent from my Nexus S 4G via XDA Premium
5th September 2011, 04:24 PM |#9  
Senior Member
Flag Boston, MA
Thanks Meter: 182
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by SComp23

The Nexus S is a phone, whereas the Galaxy S II is a mini-tablet.

I agree. 4" is the sweet spot especially considering screen sizeower consumption. I've had 3"-4.3" displays and the ns4g has spoiled me.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G via XDA Premium
5th September 2011, 05:13 PM |#10  
suhas_sm's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Flag Mumbai
Thanks Meter: 83
 
More
Guys,

I am "only" talking in terms of performance and I have noticed a huge difference.

As far I think it is the dual core that is making this kind of difference.

Sent from my Google Nexus S using XDA App
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes