[ROM][4.2.2][05/08]Slim Bean - I9100 [Build 8][FINAL]

Search This thread

k4bbe

Senior Member
Aug 1, 2011
545
429
London
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

I could not find USB mass storage and copied over the zip files when phone was connected as MTP. Would that affect the installation of zip files??

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

There is currently no native mass storage. See above posts. Either wait for next release or flash a custom kernel with mass storage support.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
 
  • Like
Reactions: shahrozeumar

shahrozeumar

Senior Member
Dec 22, 2012
314
84
Karachi
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

So the zip files won't work? They are of a new rom.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
 

k4bbe

Senior Member
Aug 1, 2011
545
429
London
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

So the zip files won't work? They are of a new rom.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

If they were completed downloads and copied completely to phone before unplugging then there is no reason that you won't be able to flash. If they are corrupted for whatever reason you should download again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shahrozeumar

shahrozeumar

Senior Member
Dec 22, 2012
314
84
Karachi
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Thanks. But they were completed and visible in CWM as zip files.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
 

misiokicio

Senior Member
Jul 4, 2010
952
233
Bathgate
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Hi all, just wondering if anyone having issues using bluetooth? Is kinda slow response and freezing when making a phone call or ending one. Get stack on end call screen for about 3 seconds before going back to normal. All good without bluetooth. Did not experienced this on previous version of the rom. Already installed whole thing again from fresh...

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
 

tazsob

Senior Member
Feb 25, 2009
131
54
Birmingham
Huawei Watch 2
Huawei P20
I just didn't get which part was "the news" item. The new version... Thats news, so thanks for that :D






Im not sure I understand what you mean.... What im getting is that if you are on a CM10.1 base and you flash Dorimanx, then you may have issues. Its broken he says very clearly :D
Slim is aosp base so I dont think we are included in that statement/warning? I may well be Wrong but perhaps a member of the Slim team can give a definitive answer on this. I doubt we are as I havent had any of the listed problems with it. I have been using Dorimanx since I joined the Slim club. No issues of note on 3.1.2. Only one on 4.2.1 is the wi fi hot spot and I don't know if that is rom or kernel related anyway. Definitely not a deal breaker for me.


Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD

+100%
I too have been using Dorimax kernel since day one of flashing Slim Bean..I'm using dual boot on this 4.2.1 version and the 3.1 version of Slim and have never had issues...
I don't use WiFi hotspot so can't comment on that but that is a kernel issue not a ROM problem...
 

CanadaJim

Senior Member
Feb 25, 2011
154
38
Guelph
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Hi all, just wondering if anyone having issues using bluetooth? Is kinda slow response and freezing when making a phone call or ending one. Get stack on end call screen for about 3 seconds before going back to normal. All good without bluetooth. Did not experienced this on previous version of the rom. Already installed whole thing again from fresh...

I too have encountered this. Especially dialing into vm the dial pad remains unusable to enter password for several seconds. Using dark slim AIO if that makes any diff.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
 

misiokicio

Senior Member
Jul 4, 2010
952
233
Bathgate
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

I too have encountered this. Especially dialing into vm the dial pad remains unusable to enter password for several seconds. Using dark slim AIO if that makes any diff.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium

Aye, forgot to mention that dialpad... Wonder what can be done to get this fix

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda app-developers app
 

k4bbe

Senior Member
Aug 1, 2011
545
429
London
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

In the RC2 changelog I dont see quick unlock when using pin?

... Thats because you are looking for it in the wrong place.
You will find that option under:

Settings/interface/lock screen/screen security in RC1 :D

uploadfromtaptalk1359885141911.jpg

Bear in mind it only applys to the lock screen and not sim unlock where you must still press enter.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk HD
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: sohell

savale

Senior Member
Aug 28, 2007
173
29
Just have to say I'm very happy with rc1. I think it's good not to rush a release and take some time for testing. When it's ready I will try rc2 for sure! :)
 

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 269
    SlimBeanOP2.png

    Disclaimer: We are not responsible for any damages on your device.

    Original Slim Features:

    1. The Real Dark Slim
    2. Notification drawer Shortcuts
    3. Full hardware key rebinding!
    4. Keyboard rotation
    5. SlimCenter

    Check out our full feature list here

    Important Notes:

    • Build 8 is the final 4.2.2 build for Slim Bean
    • NO ETA's...
    • Fully compiled from AOSP source ( source.android.com) with our mods.
    • Read the Change-log and installation instructions from the official website carefully.
    • Feature requests will be ignored in general, but we will review ( if a relevant commit or source is provided) and then decide.
    • Please provide a logcat if reporting a bug.
    • Strictly NO ports based on our ROM zip (official or unofficial build) file, manifest.xml will be updated regularly and feel free to compile from source.
    • No discussions/screenshots etc in the thread about battery life, "best settings/gov/scheduler" for "best battery life" etc... see here for the reasons why...

    Changelog
    Find our latest Changelog go here

    Chat with the slim team and other slim users
    • IRC: #slimusers@freenode
    • New to IRC? Don't have a native app? Try the Freenode web client [link] or the Firefox extension Chatzilla [link]
    • Google+ [link]
    • Twitter [link]
    • Facebook [Link]

    Installation instructions
    For Most Users
    Please keep in mind if a special instruction is needed it will be noted in the Changelog
    • Download the latest build from [here]
    • Addons ( if you don't have it already) from [here]
    • !Recommended! Full wipe, and manual format /system
    • Flash ROM and the addons you want, reboot

    FAQ
    Check out out FAQ before posting! Keeps more common questions answered in one place!

    Help us out!
    If you want to help us by translating slim to your language check out Crowdin.net and submite your translations.
    Or consider a donation.

    Thanks!
    You can find the full list of credits here

    Source
    Please visit here for the rom source code.
    Kernel source can be found here
    60
    Known Issues (as of Build 7):

    Device Specific:
    • Wifi Direct is not working
    • BT - A2DP does not transmit Artist/Track info (AOSP BT stack issue :()
    • Zoom on camcorder at 1080p is broken
    • Front camcorder buggy
    • USB Dock audio broken

    General:
    46
    Just to be clear...

    I have tested this extensively... I have other people testing it... This is why we don't do nightlies...

    Yes, we are including CM's open source RIL
    NO, we don't have the RIL issues that Rootbox has (because I figured out what was wrong and fixed it) :fingers-crossed:

    For the record, initially, I did have a broken RIL... Couldn't send touch tones in a call, couldn't hangup etc...

    TLDR; PROTIP: make clobber, tell your friends ;)

    Long Version: Turns out that, for whatever reason, the old (Sammy blob) version of libril.so was being cached and injected into the build, despite the fact that it had been removed from vendor/samsung/proprietary/i9100/lib/ :confused:

    So, you'd end up with new opensource /system/bin/rild, but old /system/lib/libril.so.

    They wouldn't play nicely together and you'd get the messed up phone functionality... :rolleyes:

    Old version of libril.so was, from memory, 49,100 bytes, new compiled one was 35,336 bytes...

    So I did what I always do when things are not being recompiled properly... I did a "make clobber"... Which completely removes the entire build directory AND wipes the compiler cache...

    Et voilà... New libril.so is built and used and everything works as it should... :thumbup: :cool:

    Note: The compiler cache is useful, in that it can cut down compile time dramatically... A full build from scratch after make clobber, using 2 threads (have to play nice with rest of team sharing build box :p) will take about an hour... If the cache is available... It'll take less than 30minutes! Very handy if you're doing a lot of compiling...

    The only issue, is that sometimes, you get situations like this, where, for whatever reason, the system doesn't detect a change and just bundles the old libraries in... :(

    Which brings me to my last point... Why I am (and most of the Slim team are) hesitant to do nightlies... (to be honest, I'm not 100% comfortable with weeklies, but they're a good way to get feedback on new features and real world user testing ;))

    Nightlies are, usually, just automatic builds of whatever is in the repo... About the only checking, is that the compile finished without errors...

    This is why they are always plastered with warnings that they are highly experimental in nature, possibly broken, use at your own risk, read before you flash, make backups etc...

    And yet, people still moan and whinge and complain at the devs and say things like "y u release broken build??!?"...

    I personally, and the Slim team as a whole, take quality seriously... Sure we've made mistakes in the past, and released subpar versions.. . And you know what? We were so concerned about it, that we modified our entire dev and release process to try to make sure it never happens again...

    This is why we:
    - moved away from the "every 2 weeks" release cycle we used to have.
    - implemented gerrit to allow for proper peer code review and testing
    - implemented a release cycle that involves code freeze, dedicated testing and final release

    Will our ROM always be perfect? No... But will we always strive to make it as close to perfect as possible? YES! :D


    Sent from my SlimBean pwned GT-I9100
    41
    Now... for some general discussion on a couple of topics...

    Firstly... Battery Life...

    There shall be no more discussions/screenshots etc about battery life, "best settings/gov/scheduler" for "best battery life" etc...

    battery is, AND ALWAYS WILL BE, very much a "personal" thing... your own particular usage patterns, apps, cell network, signal strength, RF interference, WiFi config, battery condition, brightness levels etc etc, will define what you get out of the phone/battery...

    I've seen folks who consider "normal" usage, to be having no apps installed, running all black themes/apps and sending 2 text messages a day and making or receiving one phone call of 2 minutes in length... with WiFi disabled and no mobile data. I've also seen folks who consider "normal" to be sending about 100 text messages a day... making 2 hours worth of phone calls... and listening to music via BT headphones, watching video or playing 3D games while updating Facebook every 5 minutes...

    There is no magic bullet... there is no magic governor/scheduler combo which is suddenly going to grant you 3 days of constant 3D gaming etc...

    If you suddenly get unusually high battery drain for your situation... there is about a 99% chance that you have a rogue app causing wakelocks... install BetterBatteryStats, find out what is causing all the wakelocks and fix it. If you end up in the 1%, have investigated and sought help in the BBS thread and discovered that it is actually something system related (and have BBS reports to prove it!) then go ahead and post here...

    Smartphone battery life in general is just poor compared to that old Nokia 3310 that you used to own that lasted for 7 days on a charge... get over it.

    Remember, this is, technically, a dev thread... and while I'm happy to have "general discussion" in here, mostly because a 2-thread system doesn't work... posts about battery life, and screen shots of how awesome/poor your setup is, just don't result in anything meaningful... and to be blatantly honest, there isn't anything we can really do about it to make any significant difference. Sure we might be able to get you an extra 15 mins of screen on time by tweaking the CPU and/or GPU voltages by -25mv... and opening you up to freezes, lag and random reboots in the process. :rolleyes:

    If you don't like this... feel free to go open a battery thread in the General and/or Q&A forums... any more posts in this thread regarding battery life will be reported and removed (and yes, the OP will be updated to reflect this)...

    HALO...

    quite a polarising topic this one... some folks think it is the best thing to have happened to Android. Some folks seem to think it was some sort of plague devised by Apple to destroy Android. Others simply don't care, as they realise if it ever gets implemented, it will have an On/Off switch... much like SlimPIE ;)

    As it stands, HALO just isn't ready for Slim. There are some fundamental issues with it that need to be resolved before you'll see it on an "Official" Slim build and we're not sure they can or will be resolved. This isn't just performance related either. We're talking things like:

    • The install button problem, can't press "Install" on the APK installation screen. (possibly already solved)
    • G+, whatsapp and some parts of youtube (lpe videos) are cut off or gave weird results in a floating window just to mention 3 bigger apps
    • if an app call an activity from a floating window and is waiting for activityResult the callback does not work.... Major issue!!
    • memory leaks need to be solved especially for our old devices. There is some code cleanup needed. Just turn it off for this devices do not resolve it
    This doesn't mean it will never be implemented... just that we feel it is detrimental to the overall quality and stability of the ROM as things currently stand. And of course, as with most things like this... if we ever do roll it out, it'll be a feature that you can turn on/off ;)

    On a similar topic... Hybrid mode... probably never going to happen. In our opinion, it just isn't worth the sacrifice that would have to be made to stability and performance to achieve. Consequently, this is not actively being considered, at this point, by the Slim team.


    Finally... a small teeny tiny little request... should you choose to respond to this or any of my long posts... please, for the love of little green robots everywhere... DON'T QUOTE THE WHOLE POST... remove all the bits that are not relevant!