Sure, no reason why it should not work. MX Player requires Android 2.1 and above...
I can't add a link because I'm a new user, but there was a relatively long delay (more than a week if I understand correctly) until Android 4.4.1 and 4.4.2 support was added when they were released. Users got a dialog saying "Unsupported android version" and MX Player wouldn't load. Only when MX Player v1.7.21 was released it started working again.
You can Google "mx player unsupported android version" for references.
I just want to know the current version already supports Android 4.4.3 or is it going to show the same error.
..so please update the app to support it! Getting the typical "Unsupported android version" message.
Developer is working on it. Will update the app as soon as possible...!!
Definitely does not work in 4.4.3. In fact it is the only app of the 189 that I've opened tonight on my phone that doesn't work in 4.4.3. All 188 other apps at least open.
I paid for this app and now cannot use it. When will it be updated?
I've been using BS player whenever a new version of Android comes out and therefore MX stops working.
Can confirm also.
I have just upgraded to 4.4.3 stock rom on my Nexus 7 2012 and Mx Player says it is not supported
I've been using BS player whenever a new version of Android comes out and therefore MX stops working.
I can never remember which version of vlc works on my phone.
Trivia question for you: when was the last update to Android that didn't break mx?MX Player relies on lot of android's internal modules for better performance. In the last update there was a change in audio module which was preventing the player from run.
This time it's graphics module which prevents the mx from run.
As I already said, the developer is already working on it. it will be patched as soon as possible.
Sent from my Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk
No, If I am not wrong, It does not check for the version number. It checks for internal modules.
@bleu8888
Can you confirm my statement?
Sent from my Galaxy S5 using Tapatalk
Is there any downside other than the app failing, which would be no worse than the current method?
With a proper warning message, users shouldn't complain (although I do notice the number of posters in this thread who obviously hadn't read prior posts) and there's the very good chance the app would work anyway with at least some files.