[POLL] Cyanogenmod 12.1 - odexed or deodexed?

Do you want odexed or deodexed builds in the future? (Please read OP first!)

  • Total voters
    44
Search This thread
By:
Advanced…
WhiteNeo

WhiteNeo

Senior Member
Feb 13, 2013
2,448
4,097
Hey guys, I've created this thread to ask you about your opinion on odex/deodex for future builds!
You may also discuss about this topic below. However, please use the ROM threads for device-related questions and other topics. :)


Please read the summary below before taking the poll. :)

COMPRESSED ODEXED:
+ Faster boot times after updating the ROM
+ Needs noticeably less system space than uncompressed odex
- Requires manually extracting all odex files before deodexing (time-consuming!)

UNCOMPRESSED ODEXED:
+ Faster boot times after updating the ROM
+ Easily deodexable using Lollipop Batch Deodexer
- The most space consuming

DEODEXED:
+ Compatibility with mods like Sony Camera / Xposed framework
+ Saves around 50mb on system partition, compared to compressed odex
- Updating the ROM takes up to 10-15 minutes
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeonardK
Aria.A97

Aria.A97

Senior Member
Nov 23, 2013
1,139
1,855
Talking about performance, there is no performance difference between COMPRESSED ODEXED & UNCOMPRESSED ODEXED?
 
ChrisBaron

ChrisBaron

Member
Dec 1, 2013
8
1
Beside updating and booting after update: is there a difference in performance during normal use between an odexed and deodexed version of your ROM?

sent from my Xperia T using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: sebasanchez
Aria.A97

Aria.A97

Senior Member
Nov 23, 2013
1,139
1,855
Then uncompressed odex would be best option. People who love Xposed will flash a deodexer zip and they are good to go (I have 560mb free in my system partition :D )
 
WhiteNeo

WhiteNeo

Senior Member
Feb 13, 2013
2,448
4,097
ChrisBaron said:
Beside updating and booting after update: is there a difference in performance during normal use between an odexed and deodexed version of your ROM?

sent from my Xperia T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, the difference between odex and deodex is just the fact that the files that are created during "Android is upgrading" screen are already stored on system partition and may simply be copied over by Android. :)

So apart from the much faster first boot (and a somewhat subjective "clean" feeling), there is no difference in performance. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ckovvi, Chefov01 and ChrisBaron
WhiteNeo

WhiteNeo

Senior Member
Feb 13, 2013
2,448
4,097
Alright, looks like we're going the deodexed route then! :D
I'm quite curious myself to try Power Nap for Xposed, as it seems to be able to replicate Stamina Mode and save battery quite nicely. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: am486 and Ckovvi
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

WhiteNeo
[ROM][V][UB][L] CyanogenMod 12.1 - Neo's Homebuilds [DISCONTINUED]
Replies
3K
Views
436K
T
thewizardoz
WhiteNeo
[ROM][T][UB][L] CyanogenMod 12.1 - Neo's Homebuilds [DISCONTINUED]
Replies
2K
Views
300K
N
nosadello
U
[UB][TX][L] CyanogenMod 12.1 Homebuild
Replies
381
Views
117K
Mehr7400
Mehr7400
matt4321
[STOCK][ROOTED][9.1.A.1.145][T]Official Firmware - Odexed & Deodexed[25/7/13]
Replies
126
Views
46K
matt4321
matt4321
codeworkx
[ROM][T][L][5.0.2] CyanogenMod 12 official nightly builds
Replies
314
Views
66K
D
Darkhuerta

Top Liked Posts

24 Hours All time
  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 3
    WhiteNeo
    WhiteNeo
    ChrisBaron said:
    Beside updating and booting after update: is there a difference in performance during normal use between an odexed and deodexed version of your ROM?

    sent from my Xperia T using Tapatalk
    Click to expand...
    Click to collapse
    Actually, the difference between odex and deodex is just the fact that the files that are created during "Android is upgrading" screen are already stored on system partition and may simply be copied over by Android. :)

    So apart from the much faster first boot (and a somewhat subjective "clean" feeling), there is no difference in performance. :)
    View
    2
    C
    Chefov01
    WhiteNeo said:
    So apart from the much faster first boot (and a somewhat subjective "clean" feeling), there is no difference in performance. :)
    Click to expand...
    Click to collapse

    Thanks for clearing this up once and for all! You are the best, man! Here's my vote to deodexed! :)
    View
    2
    WhiteNeo
    WhiteNeo
    Alright, looks like we're going the deodexed route then! :D
    I'm quite curious myself to try Power Nap for Xposed, as it seems to be able to replicate Stamina Mode and save battery quite nicely. :)
    View
    1
    WhiteNeo
    WhiteNeo
    Hey guys, I've created this thread to ask you about your opinion on odex/deodex for future builds!
    You may also discuss about this topic below. However, please use the ROM threads for device-related questions and other topics. :)


    Please read the summary below before taking the poll. :)

    COMPRESSED ODEXED:
    + Faster boot times after updating the ROM
    + Needs noticeably less system space than uncompressed odex
    - Requires manually extracting all odex files before deodexing (time-consuming!)

    UNCOMPRESSED ODEXED:
    + Faster boot times after updating the ROM
    + Easily deodexable using Lollipop Batch Deodexer
    - The most space consuming

    DEODEXED:
    + Compatibility with mods like Sony Camera / Xposed framework
    + Saves around 50mb on system partition, compared to compressed odex
    - Updating the ROM takes up to 10-15 minutes
    View
    1
    ChrisBaron
    ChrisBaron
    Beside updating and booting after update: is there a difference in performance during normal use between an odexed and deodexed version of your ROM?

    sent from my Xperia T using Tapatalk
    View

New posts