Maybe something to do with the FC09 Sprint Connection optimizer?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Maybe something to do with the FC09 Sprint Connection optimizer?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Im still thinking that that is just CiQ renamed
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Collects usaage reports to make their network better... yep id say same thing with a cuter name so people won't think twice... really couldn't care less either way to tell you the truth... not like I'm doing anything illegal from my phone!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
If k0nane heard you say that... oh, man...
Any infringement on my civil liberties will be met with stiff resistance. I don't conduct any illegal activities in my house, but I'm not letting some flat-foot in without a warrant. Remember what Ben Franklin said about folks who sacrifice freedom in the name of "security"...
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Maybe something to do with the FC09 Sprint Connection optimizer?
Yarrr, it sure is! ;]
There were minimal changes from Samsung for the FC09 sources.
Yarrr, it sure is! ;]
There were minimal changes from Samsung for the FC09 sources.
&**I can't record or PLAY Videos after though. Camera works fine.
It displays a message that says "Sorry, this video cannot be played"
No clue on this one.Are ya'll able to record videos after installing nubernel 2.6.35 v_0.0.1 kernel?
[snipped]
"Sorry, this video cannot be played"
[snipped]
and when I'm trying to record a Video, it just shows 0:00 and it doesn't record. Only the home button is responsive, which I use to exit the Video Recording app.
&0.0.1 has brought an increased battery drain over 0.0.0. I couldn't say why, but it's been consistent on several different setups on different roms.
&+1. Battery drain is more noticeable. I'm on a pretty bare install and haven't installed all my regular apps yet, so I can tell it's not the apps.
The only thing that was different from v0.0.0 to v0.0.1 that could be causing this is the android logger.Same here [snipped], I can't get more than 7 hours with 2hrs screen on
&TO NUBECODER:
What I am trying to do is remove the NUBECODER Boot logo? Do you have to recompile an kernel that does not have this boot logo or is there an easier way?
&I too would like the nubecoder logo gone, but if it takes a new kernel then it is to much bother, given it is beyond me, and I feel it would be rather selfish to think effort would be spent by a dev just to remove his own logo, but if it is something I can do within root explorer, then I would like to know how. I just like a cleaner looking bootup, using my own startup ani
&I just like a cleaner look to the bootup process, I would even get rid of the samsung text if I could.
&Yes that is exactly right, I like a clean look to the bootup process. Trying to keep it stock with the samsung logo tho
Sorry, there is no way to remove the kernel's splash logo with out recompiling.+1 to this. It just looks unprofessional. I went back to stock and will wait for a kernel I'm not ashamed to show my friends at work... [snipped]
&
&
&
Thanks for the support, the opinions, and the laughs.
To remove Nubernel =[, you would need to rebuild the kernel.You really are off base with your assessment
[snipped]
I have no issue with the Dev putting a logo in, just like no one should have an issue with those asking if it can be removed WITHOUT the Dev having to do anything.
If it is hard coded into the kernel, then everyone that cant do the work themselves are SOL, but if it can be removed w/o recompiling, would be nice to know how.
[snipped]
&[snipped] But your missing the point it is a developers thread, and the developer builds what he wants how he wants, and shares it. [snipped] I have a great idea let's all write to NIKE and see if they will remove the checkmark logo from their products.
Branding is the most essential aspect of anything, whether it's free or for profit.
[snipped]
@#1:Nube can I get a splash done for the kernel with a big 'hairy turd'? LOL.