LG SU660 ICS Source Drop
- Thread starter Naberus
- Start date
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource-detail.jsp?detailCustomerModelCode=LGSU660
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
Everyone request source code for the g2x for ICS here:
http://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensource-request-inquire.jsp
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
How do u think its even possible if the rom hasn't even made for g2x?
Our devs can modify the source for g2x but I don't think LG is gonna provide one for g2x
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Read this: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33235470&postcount=2
Sent from my XT885 using Tapatalk 2
Read this: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=33235470&postcount=2
Sent from my XT885 using Tapatalk 2
Yes I just saw that after I posted that.... that's really a surprise after how much we cursed LG
.... Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Ofcourse not. Hackfest was based on a modified cm9 kernel that's why all those cm9 bugs in that. The only rom using this kernel now is v30c and also the cm10 acree has on his p990
... just wait two more days ... u will start to see the roms arrive magically by the weekend Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk 2
Did LG just ***** slap T-Mobile or what! This entire time T-mobile's reps have been trying to blame LG for the lack of ICS on the G2x when LG has said they were working on it and that T-mobile didn't want the update. So LG releases to source code and look at that seems like LG was actually doing what they said.
We need to keep in mind a couple things.
1) LG Kernel source drops are rarely 100% ready to compile. The kernel experts will need time to fix all the loose ends that LG left when they ripped out things they don't want the outside world to see (it happens!) Also there may be bits and pieces that the kernel depends on to compile that are themselves proprietary and not included. Again, not a show stopper for the pros, but takes time to fix up and make into a compilable and working kernel.
2) Just because there are defines for p999 in the kernel doesn't mean that it contains full p999 support. It may or it may not. I'd be shocked if it does.
But it looks like we're golden for ICS .... Silver for JB? Hopefully if there are issues on JB with this then some of the better devs will at least give cm9 ICS a second look.
And hopefully this kernel dump will be better than previous for those of us unfortunate enough to have SOD/Reboots on anything but stock LG.
1) LG Kernel source drops are rarely 100% ready to compile. The kernel experts will need time to fix all the loose ends that LG left when they ripped out things they don't want the outside world to see (it happens!) Also there may be bits and pieces that the kernel depends on to compile that are themselves proprietary and not included. Again, not a show stopper for the pros, but takes time to fix up and make into a compilable and working kernel.
2) Just because there are defines for p999 in the kernel doesn't mean that it contains full p999 support. It may or it may not. I'd be shocked if it does.
But it looks like we're golden for ICS .... Silver for JB? Hopefully if there are issues on JB with this then some of the better devs will at least give cm9 ICS a second look.
And hopefully this kernel dump will be better than previous for those of us unfortunate enough to have SOD/Reboots on anything but stock LG.
FatalityBoyZahy
Senior Member
Can't wait for cm10 hopefully we get it before the weekend. I've had galaxy s2 and HTC amaze and I like my g2x better its just the right size
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Sent from my LG-P999 using xda app-developers app
Similar threads
- Locked
Top Liked Posts
-
There are no posts matching your filters.
-
10http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#p999/cm10/next
Bite the pillow, arcee is going in dry.
Watch there for nightlies.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app8
Someone like you always seems to hop in these threads and spread their ignorant nonsense.
RC is a brilliant pioneer without question, but certainly not the only person to provide meaningful contributions to the G2x community. Will he have the first or most stable release? I'd say probably so, but that doesn't mean that no one will have anything meaningful to add to it, or have solid releases of their own.
I'm not sure if you realize how insulting you're being to our devs, but I think you do and just don't care. I think I speak for a great number of individuals in the community when I say that it's ok for you to say something like "RC's a great dev, so I'm sure he'll have something for us relatively soon", but you can keep that dev bashing crap to yourself.6I'm on Ricardo for the heads up on the story. He understands I'm a journalist prick.
mustangtim49@Xda-developers.com3We need to keep in mind a couple things.
1) LG Kernel source drops are rarely 100% ready to compile. The kernel experts will need time to fix all the loose ends that LG left when they ripped out things they don't want the outside world to see (it happens!) Also there may be bits and pieces that the kernel depends on to compile that are themselves proprietary and not included. Again, not a show stopper for the pros, but takes time to fix up and make into a compilable and working kernel.
2) Just because there are defines for p999 in the kernel doesn't mean that it contains full p999 support. It may or it may not. I'd be shocked if it does.
But it looks like we're golden for ICS .... Silver for JB? Hopefully if there are issues on JB with this then some of the better devs will at least give cm9 ICS a second look.
And hopefully this kernel dump will be better than previous for those of us unfortunate enough to have SOD/Reboots on anything but stock LG.
