I don't know if it's just me but my reception seems much more stable with this kernel running on AOKP. I want JB back though
So whats the advantage of being able to run 512 over 384? Performance? Is it worth it if my device and run 512 or does it take a huge battery hit?
Edit: NVM read a few pages back when someone asked the same question.
Edit 2: What apps do you guys use for the cpu? I used to use SetCPU back on the atrix but that was a while ago...
I don't know if it's just me but my reception seems much more stable with this kernel running on AOKP. I want JB back though
Does franco.Kernel govern WiFi? My WiFi seems to have taken a major hit in stability since switching to JB. What are everyone else's experiences thus far?
Has anyone experienced 512 working for them now in JB where before on ICS you couldn't? Just curious.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
http://minooch.com/franciscofranco/Galaxy Nexus/nightlies/
196 is the latest ICS kernel. There is an experimental r200 out there, but 196 was the last official nightly for ICS.
Thanks. But what I was looking for was the jelly bean kernel for ice cream sandwich. Have they been discontinued?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
So whats the advantage of being able to run 512 over 384? Performance? Is it worth it if my device and run 512 or does it take a huge battery hit?
Edit: NVM read a few pages back when someone asked the same question.
Edit 2: What apps do you guys use for the cpu? I used to use SetCPU back on the atrix but that was a while ago...
Following this post, I want to ask something...
Why is that our GPU is clocked at 307Mhz if the OMAP 4460 has a stock GPU of 384Mhz?
I know Franco has to overclock to 384Mhz and 512Mhz...
Google/Samsung underclocked it for supposed "battery savings" but everyone here has found them to be neglegible, especially between 307 and 384. Since the stock GPU clock is 384 Franco is only actually overclocking it for the 512 GPU build.
Cool, thank you!!
So the 384Mhz GPU Kernel is actually a "stock" clock for our SoC and 512Mhz is the overclocked version...
Stock GPU comes with 307Mhz but I overclocked it to 384Mhz. Since it runs with the same voltage the battery difference is basically... null.
This kind of thing is hit or miss, as for me WIFI reception is better. I guess a bunch of things come into play, especially how your router like the new JB WIFI driver.
Nop not milestone. r217 been out a while because I ve been busy with the app and add support for SGS3. Dont expect a big bump on r218, so far its only fixes.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Latency - Download - Upload
cubic:
1st run: 15ms - 10,75Mbps - 7,82Mbps
2nd run: 14ms - 10,84Mbps - 8,06Mbps
reno:
1st run: 13ms - 15,51Mbps - 6,73Mbps
2nd run: 13ms - 14,73Mbps - 8,51Mbps
bic:
1st run: 12ms - 10,38Mbps - 8,61Mbps
2nd run: 13ms - 10,78Mbps - 8,62Mbps
westwood:
1st run: 11ms - 17,65Mbps - 8,30Mbps
2nd run: 13ms - 13,28Mbps - 8,29Mbps
highspeed:
1st run: 13ms - 10,76Mbps - 7,94Mbps
2nd run: 16ms - 14,42Mbps - 8,52Mbps
hybla:
1st run: 14ms - 11,19Mbps - 7,44Mbps
2nd run: 14ms - 13,47Mbps - 7,56Mbps
htcp:
1st run: 14ms - 13,24Mbps - 7,03Mbps
2nd run: 15ms - 10,85Mbps - 8,00Mbps
vegas:
1st run: 14ms - 8,49Mbps - 6,62Mbps
2nd run: 14ms - 12,00Mbps - 7,07Mbps
veno:
1st run: 13ms - 9,58Mbps - 8,13Mbps
2nd run: 13ms - 8,50Mbps - 7,64Mbps
scalable:
1st run: 18ms - 12,01Mbps - 8,73Mbps
2nd run: 14ms - 13,96Mbps - 8,23Mbps
lp:
1st run: 14ms - 14,90Mbps - 8,68Mbps
2nd run: 14ms - 13,44Mbps - 8,72Mbps
yeah:
1st run: 14ms - 13,37Mbps - 8,28Mbps
2nd run: 17ms - 13,89Mbps - 8,14Mbps
illinois:
1st run: 13ms - 12,93Mbps - 8,24Mbps
2nd run: 16ms - 13,97Mbps - 6,46Mbps
Just woken up and feel like my head is going to explode already this last 5 pages is crazy
I got these from that thread:
so it makes much sense, to make the min_sample_time as low as possible (?), but how low? what's the most appropriate sample time for battery and performance?
for the timer_rate, franco suggested 30k to consider the CPUs latency. What has it to do with the cpu's latency?
he also said min_sample_time doesn't have to be in multiple of timer_rate.
in my case, all my timers are in 20k, which works fine as of now. But i must be missing some things, because I just saw somebody post these values, and no detailed explanation for having them.
So to make the short hand easier, we kept it in that order and just said: 20000/50/40000/20000 became 20k/50/40k/20k became 2/5/4/2. Make sense?above_hispeed_delay: 20000
go_hispeed_load: 50
min_sample_time: 40000
timer_rate: 20000
-above_hispeed_delay: Once speed is set to hispeed_freq, wait for this long before bumping speed higher in response to continued high load.
-go_hispeed_load: The CPU load at which to ramp to the intermediate "hi speed".
-min_sample_time: The minimum amount of time to spend at a frequency before we can ramp down.
-timer_rate: Sample rate for reevaluating cpu load when the system is not idle.
So Google's default is 10/5/6/2. Lower numbers are all better for performance except min_sample_time (there higher is faster). So our goal is to find a sweet spot.-above_hispeed_delay: higher = better battery, lower = better performance. (100k is default)
-go_hispeed_load:.......higher = better battery, lower = better performance. (50 is default)
-min_sample_time:......lower = better battery, higher = better performance. (60k is default)
-timer_rate:.................higher = better battery, lower = better performance. (20k is default)
Device: Galaxy Nexus
Max Frequency: 1305 MHz
Min Frequency: 384 MHz
Governor: interactive
Governor Tunables: a_h_d 15000 / g_h_l 95 / h_f 729600 Hz / m_s_t 45000 / t_r 15000 / i_b_f 1036800 Hz / t_l 85 / t_s 80000 / b_d 1000000
IO Scheduler: row
IO Scheduler Tunables: h_r_q 100 / r_r_q 75 / h_s_q 5 / r_s_q 4 / r_w_q 4 / l_r_q 3 / l_s_q 2 / r_i 15 / r_i_f 25
Read Ahead Buffer: 512; NR Requests: 512
TCP Congestion Avoidance Algorithm: westwood
Screen Off Max Frequency: 537 MHz
Color Multipliers: 230 235 340
RGB Gamma: -4 0 5
Trinity Contrast: -22; OMAP4 Gamma: 4; CAB: Disabled
Sent from franco.Kernel updater app:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.franco.kernel
mpu_voltages:
1804mhz: 1425 mV
1728mhz: 1375 mV
1612mhz: 1325 mV
1536mhz: 1275 mV
1420mhz: 1225 mV
1305mhz: 1175 mV
1228mhz: 1125 mV
1036mhz: 1075 mV
729mhz: 925 mV
537mhz: 825 mV
384mhz: 775 mV
192mhz: 725 mV
iva_voltages:
430mhz: 1125 mV
332mhz: 1025 mV
266mhz: 925 mV
133mhz: 825 mV
core_voltages:
512mhz: 1050 mV
384mhz: 975 mV
153mhz: 800 mV