Yeah this is right. S4's low light performance was sub par. Still being said that if Moto X's camera was like S4 I would be dancing. X's below average consistency for day shots and absolutely horrible focus motor just puts this camera really low in the rank. It is two generations behind, S2 shots which I took two years ago looks better than this, really sad. I would gladly have taken an average Sony sensor than this Omnivision or whatever sensor is this...You people are wrong, yet the galaxy s4 uses a 13mpx SONY RS sensor, lacks in low light conditions even further than moto X would, the omnivision sensor placed on moto x it's capable of shooting 2k-4k real videos, I think moto x camera need heavy efforts in development by lenovo in this case, they can achieve wide benefits from the clear pixel technology, some algorithms an improved camera app and a better image processing would put the moto X in the top of g
High end phones with great and no regrets cameras.
All these namings are nonsense too. ClearPixel, Ultrapixel, BS. Z2 or S5 or Lumia's camera don't need any fancy naming to take good photos. I hope X+1 will have a non fancy sensor with a non funny name.
Last edited: