VZW GS3 Custom Kernel Experiences

Search This thread

tee00max

Senior Member
Jun 19, 2009
989
116
Atlanta, GA
I installed the faux kernel and I am having a hard time keeping my sd card mounted. Anyone experience that. I have a 64gb installed.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium
 

fz798

Senior Member
Dec 4, 2009
1,225
529
I'm at 15 hours and only down to 61%, running CleanROM 5.5.1 and Faux123 with optimized settings as mentioned in the CR thread.

I usually leave my phone charging overnight but I'm going to leave it unplugged to keep tracking the amazing battery life I'm getting from this combination of ROM and kernel.

Will post a snap later....


Almost 30 hours, with 2h 12m screen time, battery is at 14% .... to me, that is absolutely fantastic battery life.
 

Attachments

  • 2012.12.25-12.22.14.jpg
    2012.12.25-12.22.14.jpg
    76.8 KB · Views: 679
  • 2012.12.25-12.23.39.jpeg
    2012.12.25-12.23.39.jpeg
    169.5 KB · Views: 661

tee00max

Senior Member
Jun 19, 2009
989
116
Atlanta, GA
I would really like to try this kernel out but its not letting me mount my SD card. Just keeps saying its safe to remove.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
 

Elite49

Senior Member
Jul 5, 2011
776
60
Using Faux B3 with Intelli and Ondemand. I notice more lag on Intelli even with the V3 Beta.
 

prdog1

Senior Member
Mar 10, 2012
9,102
5,466
Houston, Texas
I would really like to try this kernel out but its not letting me mount my SD card. Just keeps saying its safe to remove.

Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app

64gb?

Samsung Galaxy SIII powered by CleanROM 5.5.2

Yep

Sent from my SCH-I535 using xda premium

I can't remember where I saw it but it was in one of the kernel threads that the 64gb needs to be formatted a certain way...

Samsung Galaxy SIII powered by CleanROM 5.5.2

Has to be formatted to Fat32 until the kernel devs can make kernel play nice with Samsung ExFat modules. Ziggy been trying but not got it working on large cards. He says works on 16 but I haven't got it to work on 32 or 64 GB cards. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: o0BlacknesS0o

Hypera

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2010
153
14
It's the T-Mobile one. Here is the direct page. Beta 3 is what I'm using on my Vzw S3. TW only. ***not responsible...yadda yada yadda****

http://faux.androidro.ms/d2tmo/beta/

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

ADDED LINKS TO CUSTOM KERNEL THREADS IN OP...CLICK, READ, LEARN, FLASH, FLASH, FLASH, REHAB, FALL OFF THE WAGON, KEEP FLASHING LOL

Samsung Galaxy SIII powered by CleanROM 5.5.2


Thank you
 

nick7893

Senior Member
May 1, 2012
76
15
Beans 7 with lk 1.2.1 and am greatly enjoying the performance; however I can't find out how to determine which processor I have (slow, mid, or fast) to set iso's recommended voltages

Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda premium
 

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 19
    Hey guys,

    As many of us try out the various custom kernels for the various custom ROMs, we like to share our experiences, good or bad. However the problem with doing this is that we often clutter the ROM thread with unrelated kernel talk.

    So here is the perfect thread to share your experience.


    ALL THAT IS ASKED OF YOU IS THAT YOU LIST THE ROM AND KERNEL AND THEIR VERSIONS IN YOUR POST AND PLEASE DO NOT POST MIRRORS... JUST LINK TO DEVELOPERS THREAD IF LINKS ARE REQUESTED

    THANK YOU


    Latest Kernels



    STOCK VRBLK3

    TouchWiz only

    GOVERNORS: msm-dcvs, ondemand, performance, powersave, userspace

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=35777314



    STOCK VRBMA2 by Beanstown106

    TouchWiz only

    GOVERNORS: msm-dcvs, ondemand, performance, powersave, userspace

    http://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=9390288116658473017



    STOCK VRBMB1

    TouchWiz only

    GOVERNORS: msm-dcvs, ondemand, performance, powersave, userspace

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=39552786




    BMS

    AOSP only

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=37595731



    Deviant Kernel by ptmr3

    TouchWiz only

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38045242



    DKP by decimalman

    AOSP

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=40084183



    Envy by Rath1on

    TouchWiz & AOSP

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=35820621



    Faux123 Kernel Project by faux123
    Recommended App FauxClock

    TouchWiz & AOSP

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=29068318



    KT747 by ktoonsez
    Includes KTweaker App

    TouchWiz & AOSP

    GOVERNORS: abyssplug, adaptive, badass, conservative, intellidemand, interactive, ktoonservative, lagfree, lazy, lulzactive, msm-dcvs, ondemand, pegasusq, performance, powersave, userspace, scary, sleepy, SLP, smartassv2, superbad, wheatley,

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=30719566



    Lean Kernel by Imoyseon

    TouchWiz

    GOVERNORS: msm-dcvs, ondemand, interactivex

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=34636372



    Ziggy471 Project by Ziggy471

    TouchWiz only

    projects.ziggy471.com/projects/ziggy471-sgs3-jb/files



    Zeus Kernel by sbreen94

    TouchWiz only

    http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=39571145
    10
    Yes, slowly but surely.

    It would be a lot easier if there were git patches instead of ring kissing for instructions.

    A git patch is worthless if you don't know what it's doing or how.
    Give a man a fish (or patch) and he eats (or codes) for a day, teach him how to fish (or how to fix code) and he can eat every day (or fix code on his own).

    Silver platter or valuable knowledge :) think on that.

    Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 2
    10
    Yes, slowly but surely.

    It would be a lot easier if there were git patches instead of ring kissing for instructions.

    It would be easier if devs paid a little more attention to what they were doing instead of whining about git patches to copy from...

    Now... your more than welcome to provide input in this thread but keep your snide and immature, subtle or blatant attempts at insulting others to yourself
    8
    Thread cleaned
    I thought I made it clear there was to be no in depth discussion of Anthrax
    No discussion of the site it comes from, nor the developer there or his practices!
    If you have the Anthrax kernel then you have access to the site, please discuss it there
    I will tolerate no disrespect of any developer whether they are on this site or not
    Do not come onto XDA inciting any wars about this! What happens there, stays there!
    You want to discuss GPL with that developer, make an account there and discuss it with him
    Do not post here where only third parties can speak for him
    Thank you for your cooperation
    Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
    7
    OK, let's not turn this into a huge....thing.
    The offending post has been edited by the poster but apparently not before being quoted.
    Let's end it here before it gets out of hand.
    We can all appreciate an intellectual debate which furthers development
    Stick to that. I do not want to see attacks just to prove you can.
    I have subscribed to this thread
    Thank you for your cooperation
    Friendly Neighborhood Moderator