[KERNEL] [GPL] [GN] franco.Kernel r398
- Thread starter franciscofranco
- Start date
Not in the mobile app
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
FC's mine
Not in the mobile app
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
You got me there, it does it in tapatalk too...
Yupp. Tapatalk shows it all. Hence why I said it lol didn't know it was in code so
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
It disables it unless you manually re enable the second core, I believe
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
sampling_rate_min has been set by Franco, although it may be possible to change it with an init.d script. Too bad the sampling rate can not be set lower... I would also like to set it to 15000
For those looking for better performance than the stock settings, use 384/1200 interactive instead of ondemand with a high max freq (I tried 1420 and 1536 steps). I did some tests and the first setup always yields better real life performance, better benchmarks, and better screen on time.
Wheatley on the other hand I have not tested yet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Wheatley on the other hand I have not tested yet.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
What do you mean by the "first setup"?
Let us know what you find with Wheatley.
Last edited:
Would it be possible to add into the Franco application, an option to install a stock kernel? [I ask as my nandroid is corrupted].
There are two stock kernels, ICS and JB. If you google it, you can find either one.
384/1228 interactive. R230 512 gpu. Official gsm extended battery. Mostly wifi and a couple hours of 3g.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
384/1228 interactive. R230 512 gpu. Official gsm extended battery. Mostly wifi and a couple hours of 3g.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Had you used the 384 before, by any chance? If so, how did it compare?
Also, kudos on the nick.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
On ics I did some tests between the two. Virtually the same battery life. I think 512 gpu only affects battery life negatively if you're playing 3d games a lot since that's prob the only time it'll ramp all the way to 512.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Thats a gpu driver microkernel crash, nothing I can do about it.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Similar threads
Top Liked Posts
-
There are no posts matching your filters.
-
1562I hate big OPs.
Works on all roms. r390 and newer versions are ONLY for 4.3 or newer.
F.A.Q:
1. My device rebooted or crashed, how can I help?
A: Get me /proc/last_kmsg on pastie.org.
2. Battery sucks, my device is not entering deep sleep. FIX PLOX!
A: Fix it yourself, it's an app waking your device up not the kernel's problem
3. Signal is dropping since I flashed the kernel, amg u sucks!
A: The kernel has nothing to do with gsm/cmda signal. Make sure you have the latest radios
4. Do I need to wipe anything when flashing this kernel?
A: No.
5. Does this kernel has X or Y mod?
A: Learn to read, everything you need to know is in the features list, changelog or public repo.
Downloads:
4.3: http://192.241.177.15/GalaxyNexus/4.3/
4.4: http://192.241.177.15/GalaxyNexus/4.4/
Kernel changelog:
http://192.241.177.15/GalaxyNexus/4.3/appfiles/changelog.xml
Source:
https://github.com/franciscofranco/Tuna_JB_pre1/tree/nightlies-4.3
franco.Kernel updater Free apk: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1867127
203[KERNEL][GPL][5 JUN - #Milestone 4][r200-ICS r210-JB] franco.Kernel | 4.0.3/4 |
Terminal commands for all the options in this kernel:
Color Multipliers:
echo r g b > /sys/class/misc/colorcontrol/multiplier
Replace r g and b for 2000000000 for stock color. If you want to change the colors just replace the first 3 numbers of each r/g/b with 0-400 of your choice.
Gamma Control:
echo r g b > /sys/class/misc/colorcontrol/v1_offset
Replace r/g/b by -255/200 of your choice.
Fsync:
echo 1 > /sys/module/sync/parameters/fsync_enabled - to enable
echo 0 > /sys/module/sync/parameters/fsync_enabled - to disable
Sound Control:
echo i > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/soundcontrol/volume_boost
Replace i with 0-3 of your choice.
Sound High Performance:
echo 1 > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/soundcontrol/highperf_enabled - to enable
echo 0 > /sys/devices/virtual/misc/soundcontrol/highperf_enabled - to disable
USB Fast Charge:
echo 1 > /sys/kernel/fast_charge/force_fast_charge - to enable
echo 0 > /sys/kernel/fast_charge/force_fast_charge - to disable
wifi_pm:
echo 1 > /sys/module/bcmdhd/parameters/wifi_pm - to enable
echo 0 > /sys/module/bcmdhd/parameters/wifi_pm - to disable
Trinity's Contrast:
echo i > /sys/module/panel_s6e8aa0/parameters/contrast
Replace i with -25/16 of your choice.
BLX:
echo i > /sys/class/misc/batterylifeextender/charging_limit
Replace i with 0-100 of your choice.
OMAP Gamma interface:
echo i > /sys/devices/platform/omapdss/manager0/gamma
Replace i with 5-10 of your choice.
Thermal Throttle:
echo 1 > /sys/module/omap_temp_sensor/parameters/throttle_enabled - to enable
echo 0 > /sys/module/omap_temp_sensor/parameters/throttle_enabled - to disable
TCP Congestion Algorithm interface
To check all the available options:
sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_available_congestion_control
To change to other option:
sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=NAME_OF_THE_ALGORITHM
Detailed test of all the algorithms:
167
haha. It's been a crazy two days. But it's been a blast.
Now, sleep is over, time to get back to work!
Yes and no. Here's what we're thinkin' so far.
THIS POST WILL BE A RECAP OF THE LAST FEW PAGES OF RESEARCH!
This was my original settings that I've been using for weeks:
So to make the short hand easier, we kept it in that order and just said: 20000/50/40000/20000 became 20k/50/40k/20k became 2/5/4/2. Make sense?
Here is a breakdown of what they each mean:
This is a good explanation that I wrote back on page 3038:
So Google's default is 10/5/6/2. Lower numbers are all better for performance except min_sample_time (there higher is faster). So our goal is to find a sweet spot.
The default 10 is for "Once speed is set to hispeed_freq, wait for this long before bumping speed higher in response to continued high load." So we think 10 is too high, but if you go too low, then you'll be using the higher freqs a lot more than you need and it will hurt the battery. So we are leaning towards 6 (60000) for above_hispeed_delay.
The default 5 is for "when the CPU hits X% amount of load, then jump to the hispeed_freq." Again if this one is too low then it will cause the higher freqs to be used more often then they need, so we actually turn go_hispeed_load up a little bit to 7 (70).
The default 6 is for "how long do I wait before lowering the clock speed from what it's currently at." So the lower we put this, the better battery will be. We're still trying to decide between 3 (30000) and 5 (50000). Osm0sis is getting more lag at lower levels, and finds the best performance mark at 5. So we turn min_sample_time down a little from stock to help with the battery.
The default 2 is for "wait this long before changing the clockspeeds from what it's at now." While technically 2 sounds better because it's changing more often, Franco believes that by setting the timer_rate to be the same thing as the CPU sample_rate (which is preset at 30000), then that will make the CPU more efficient at switching. So we increased it from 2 (20000) to 3 (30000).
So TO RECAP: Using the stuff from above, Google's defaults for these settings are 10/5/6/2 and we are changing them to 6/7/3/3 or 6/7/5/3 (again, still testing that third number for the min_sample_time).
Does that make sense for everyone interested in following along? Any questions? Feel free to try out these settings yourself (the easiest way is with Franco's app or something like Trickster). We want as much feedback as possible on this.
The next kernel release will have the totally tweaked settings for everyone to test without having to change their own stuff.
:laugh::good:111Kernel Emergency Settings Reset Zip
Alright so here's something that's been requested for awhile.
I wrote it up recently with Franco's stamp of approval, so I'm posting it here now. Please direct people back to this post from other threads.
This can/should be everyone's go-to when experiencing problems after updating to a new kernel build, you get stuck in a bootloop, or you think there's a conflict between ROM and kernel (or kernel tweaking app) you can't track down, since likely some leftover settings (voltages, etc.) are at fault. It's also useful if you just want to make sure you're running clean defaults. This should work on any device franco.Kernel and f.Ku support, as well as a variety of other devices, kernels and control apps: eXperience (Free/Pro), GLaDOS Control, TricksterMod, Trinity Kernel Toolbox, ROM Toolbox (Lite/Pro), SetCPU, Faux123 Kernel Enhancement Project, Performance Control and Synapse.
Flashing this via custom recovery of your choice will delete the kernel app settings file(s), disable init.d and userinit.d scripts by moving them to a subfolder (/system/etc/init.d/off/ and /data/local/userinit.d/off/ respectively) and wipe cache and dalvik-cache for good measure.
Hopefully it helps!
Note: If your ROM has a Performance/Tweaking App built-in you should also manually disable any Set On Boot options it has. For example, I couldn't include clearing CM's Advanced Settings since they're built into the main com.android.settings/Settings.apk along with a lot of other Android OS settings (APNs, Developer Options, etc.), so to run clean and without conflicts on CM you need to unset them yourself.
You should also avoid having more than one control app installed at a time. Conflicts have been reported even with everything "unset" in two apps.
I also chose not to disable anything your ROM may have in /data/cron or /system/addon.d since some rely on it heavily, so you can choose to review those directories' contents and whether you want to leave them enabled on your own. I also left out disabling sysctl.conf since that's done by f.K and the Franco's Dev Team scripts, and also seemed a bit heavy-handed for this zip script.
Download counts for the previous versions: 790; 2678.105Sure. Happy to post my franco.Kernel settings here for anyone who wants to try them. I'll keep these up-to-date if I change them.
These are my f.K settings, my DirtyV settings can be found here.
Fsync on just in case anything ever happens I want my data protected. That said I do disable it temporarily if I ever want a bit more performance in an app or game. SR is hardcoded disabled in the latest builds.
The other thing worth noting is I set my color settings on boot with an init.d script. Doing it that way you can end up with a completely different result from the same values. The contrast, blacks and colors are much more natural. Also it's seamless which is nice; they take effect during the Google logo. Attached is my init.d script for that. Alter it to your own color settings, remove the .txt extension, push to /system/etc/init.d/ and set the correct perms; rwxr-xr-x (chmod -R 755 /system/etc/init.d in Terminal Emulator).
900colorsettings can be found with my other init.d scripts (from Franco Dev Team), here: https://s.basketbuild.com/filedl/devs?dev=osm0sis&dl=osm0sis/scripts/900colorsettings
Note: On my new replacement screen, setting the color multiplier too early in the boot (any time before the boot animation) made everything look dark, oversaturated, uncontrasted and dusky; basically the opposite of the way it used to work on my old panel. Adding sleep 2; before that line in the init.d script fixed this, so experiment if your panel is more like my new one, and the init.d as-is after you put in your settings makes it look worse.
[ New init.d script with my new colors. I need the sleep 4 because of my problem in my "Note" above, so comment it out if you don't need it, it will make it look worse. Previous download counts were 1880, 646, and 307. Thanks everyone! ]
