Curiosity...

---

I am curious, what do people prefer, CM9 or AOKP rom?
In my opinion AOKP is a little more stable and reliable, battery wise. lemme know your opinion.

I prefer aokp if i could ever get bluetooth to work across 2 epics. lol but cm9 is just as good, without the added settings that is.

Aokp, which would be non existant without the cm team, theresstill bugs to be worked out so i cant wait till official cm9

Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium

Originally Posted by Fire n mage

Aokp, which would be non existant without the cm team, theresstill bugs to be worked out so i cant wait till official cm9

Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium

yeah its pretty awesome to have 4.0 running on our devices. it seems like a month and a half ago it barely even booted. very few bugs on my end. its better than the stock rom, i was lucky to get 3 hours out of it on battery life. im getting 9 hours now with heavy usage using an oem 1800mah battery

AOKP. I was not a fan of the CM9 bootani (liked the AOKP bootani even less, and the ability to turn it off was a +.). Speed and battery life seem comparable, and AOKP is essentially CM9 with more customization options which is always welcome. Credit and much thanks to CM9 devs and the AOKP kanger(s), of course.

Both are quite amazing. And true there would be NO AOKP w/o cyanogenmod. For me I prefer AOKP for 2 reasons 1. Better battery life & 2. ROM control.

Thanks to the CM team, and all involved in getting AOKP to our epics!

sent from my EPICAOKP using xda app