Originally Posted by NZtechfreak
The Mali's performance is the same as the Tegra 3's in graphics benchmarks I've done on my Note Vs my Prime and my One X (just goes to show how average the Tegra 3 GPU really is I think, no better than something at least 6 months older). Disappointing it's not the upgraded GPU if that is accurate, but doesn't differentiate the products at all.
Mali 400/450 is a 2nd generation GPU like tegra 2, only 44 millions polygons/sec, My Adreno 205 is 41 millions & The Tegra 3 is 129 millions.
Gameloft games in the end of 2012 will need 100 millions...
The Mali 3rd generation is Mali T-604/640 & Mali say that's it is 500% the performances of previous Mali GPU's :
500% is using quad-core optimised applis (only tegra 3 will have it in less than 2 years) but it's 250% in dual-core...
As Tegra 3 is equal to T-604, Mali 400 is pawned...
-1st gen (Adreno 200, mali 200/300, SGX Power VR 520/530 & tegra 1)
-2nd gen (Adreno 205, Mali 400MP/450MP, SGX Power VR 540/554 & tegra 2)
-3rd gen (Adreno 220/225/320, Mali T604/640, SGX Power VR G 6200/6430 & Tegra 3)
[Mediatek MT 6575 Dual-sim HSPA Soc 40 nm
CPU Cortex™ A9 at 1 Ghz (Neon™ - VFP v3 - 1 Mo Cache L2 )
GPU SGX PowerVR ™ 531 at 200 mhz (128 bits mem bus - 22 Mtri/sec - 700 Mpix/sec - HD720 HW Encod/Decod )
1 Go RAM 400 MHz LPDDR2
20 Go ROM (4 Go internal memory & 16 Go Class 10 TDK® MicroSD)
4,3" qHD (960*540) TFT capacitive touchscreen
5 Mpixels HDR & HD720 camera
Android 4.03 Acer® stock : 3.0.13 Kernel & ICS 4.0.3 ROM - SuperUser Elite ]
Acer Liquid Gallant duo [E350]