Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

[Q] Tegra 3 VS Mali-400 ?

OP Milad._.R

20th April 2012, 11:59 PM   |  #11  
BarryH_GEG's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Spokane, Washington
Thanks Meter: 4,400
 
8,972 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinderbox (UK)

The Mali 400 is old now

Technically, so is Teg3. S4 uses 28nm and the 4212 uses 32nm. Teg3 is two 45nm A9 chips glommed together because Nvidia wanted to be first to market with a next-gen chip. It's the least advanced of any of the three SoCs. From a GPU perspective none of the three really move the ball forward and are just evolutionary vs. revolutionary. If I had to guess best overall performance I’d say 4212, Teg3, and S4 in that order. Because S4 and the 4212 are on smaller dies they’ll be more efficient and handily beat Teg3 at battery life (except maybe at idle).
21st April 2012, 12:28 AM   |  #12  
Tinderbox (UK)'s Avatar
Senior Member
Flag South Shields
Thanks Meter: 123
 
951 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2010
delete post.
Last edited by Tinderbox (UK); 21st April 2012 at 12:30 AM.
21st April 2012, 02:19 AM   |  #13  
Senior Member
Flag Adelaide
Thanks Meter: 100
 
489 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by BarryH_GEG

Technically, so is Teg3. S4 uses 28nm and the 4212 uses 32nm. Teg3 is two 45nm A9 chips glommed together because Nvidia wanted to be first to market with a next-gen chip. It's the least advanced of any of the three SoCs. From a GPU perspective none of the three really move the ball forward and are just evolutionary vs. revolutionary. If I had to guess best overall performance I’d say 4212, Teg3, and S4 in that order. Because S4 and the 4212 are on smaller dies they’ll be more efficient and handily beat Teg3 at battery life (except maybe at idle).

tegra3 is actually made on the 40nm. nvidia still has tsmc's 40nm process and is migrating towards 28nm with desktop GPUs and will eventually migrate to 28nm with the tegra3+.
The Following User Says Thank You to Souai For This Useful Post: [ View ]
30th May 2012, 09:04 AM   |  #14  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 113
 
485 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2011
More
i hate how people always say that its a bad thing that apple didn`t upgrade the gpu but fust added more cores or samsung didn`t change the mali 400 gpu. the fact is that the mali and sgx543mp2 were ahead when they were released. now there is actual competition like the adreno 320 and tegra 3/4. a simple overclocked sgx or mali chip is enough to keep up with the competition.
25th July 2012, 09:17 AM   |  #15  
Sekhen's Avatar
Member
Flag Paris
Thanks Meter: 14
 
30 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2012
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtechfreak

The Mali's performance is the same as the Tegra 3's in graphics benchmarks I've done on my Note Vs my Prime and my One X (just goes to show how average the Tegra 3 GPU really is I think, no better than something at least 6 months older). Disappointing it's not the upgraded GPU if that is accurate, but doesn't differentiate the products at all.

Mali 400/450 is a 2nd generation GPU like tegra 2, only 44 millions polygons/sec, My Adreno 205 is 41 millions & The Tegra 3 is 129 millions.
Gameloft games in the end of 2012 will need 100 millions...

The Mali 3rd generation is Mali T-604/640 & Mali say that's it is 500% the performances of previous Mali GPU's :

http://www.arm.com/products/multimed.../mali-t604.php

500% is using quad-core optimised applis (only tegra 3 will have it in less than 2 years) but it's 250% in dual-core...

As Tegra 3 is equal to T-604, Mali 400 is pawned...

-1st gen (Adreno 200, mali 200/300, SGX Power VR 520/530 & tegra 1)
-2nd gen (Adreno 205, Mali 400MP/450MP, SGX Power VR 540/554 & tegra 2)
-3rd gen (Adreno 220/225/320, Mali T604/640, SGX Power VR G 6200/6430 & Tegra 3)
Last edited by Sekhen; 25th July 2012 at 09:23 AM.
25th July 2012, 09:52 AM   |  #16  
hamdir's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Beirut
Thanks Meter: 14,306
 
21,816 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sekhen

Mali 400/450 is a 2nd generation GPU like tegra 2, only 44 millions polygons/sec, My Adreno 205 is 41 millions & The Tegra 3 is 129 millions.
Gameloft games in the end of 2012 will need 100 millions...

The Mali 3rd generation is Mali T-604/640 & Mali say that's it is 500% the performances of previous Mali GPU's :

http://www.arm.com/products/multimed.../mali-t604.php

500% is using quad-core optimised applis (only tegra 3 will have it in less than 2 years) but it's 250% in dual-core...

As Tegra 3 is equal to T-604, Mali 400 is pawned...

-1st gen (Adreno 200, mali 200/300, SGX Power VR 520/530 & tegra 1)
-2nd gen (Adreno 205, Mali 400MP/450MP, SGX Power VR 540/554 & tegra 2)
-3rd gen (Adreno 220/225/320, Mali T604/640, SGX Power VR G 6200/6430 & Tegra 3)

link to your numbers about Tegra 3?
25th July 2012, 05:07 PM   |  #17  
Junior Member
Xi'An
Thanks Meter: 1
 
26 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2012
More
I have not used any device with Mali 400. Sorry mate~~
26th July 2012, 11:20 AM   |  #18  
Member
Thanks Meter: 1
 
34 posts
Join Date:Joined: Mar 2011
I think that tegra 3 is better but we have to attend the 3.x kernel to solve the battery problem properly.

Sent from my HTC One X using xda app-developers app
26th July 2012, 11:44 AM   |  #19  
Senior Member
Flag Dublin
Thanks Meter: 101
 
1,319 posts
Join Date:Joined: Feb 2006
More
Mali-400 is good and strong and Tegra 3 might not be the fastest one there is, but it's the only one that gets best looking games. On top of that, Tegra 3 Plus is coming soon and then next year another one with direct x and supposed console-like performance. See what Nvidia does for desktops and just hope they keep the pace with mobile GPU and we will get there too. I don't really consider non-tegra device unless it amazes me with noticeably better power efficiency or optimized games start coming out for it.
Would you buy non-nvidia and non-ati graphics card for your pc?
18th September 2012, 04:03 PM   |  #20  
ericpeacock79's Avatar
Member
Thanks Meter: 10
 
74 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by schriss

Mali-400 is good and strong and Tegra 3 might not be the fastest one there is, but it's the only one that gets best looking games. On top of that, Tegra 3 Plus is coming soon and then next year another one with direct x and supposed console-like performance. See what Nvidia does for desktops and just hope they keep the pace with mobile GPU and we will get there too. I don't really consider non-tegra device unless it amazes me with noticeably better power efficiency or optimized games start coming out for it.
Would you buy non-nvidia and non-ati graphics card for your pc?

Exactly!

Given the choice, I would buy a Tegra device over anything else.

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes