ToqAN Fixes Android 5.0 Notification Bug on Qualcomm Toq

The Qualcomm Toq is probably one of the lesser known smartwatches on the market … more

How to Root and Unlock the Google Nexus 6 on a Mac – XDA TV

In the past, XDA Developer TV Producer droidmodd3rx has shown you how to … more

Set Up Your MediaTek Device with Comprehensive Beginner’s Guide

As can be seen with the use of MediaTek chips in Android One devices … more

Sony Updates AOSP Sources to Android 5.0.1

Just a few days ago, Sony did an utterly fantastic job by pushing out numerous device trees for … more

Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

How good is CM9 on the Artix?

OP Azurael

30th April 2012, 02:19 AM   |  #21  
Azurael's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Flag Bath
Thanks Meter: 208
 
833 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2008
More
Uhh, I did say the Moto release will fix the prevailing bugs that currently exist mainly as a result of the hackish graphics driver implementation the Atrix CM9 devs have been forced to use.

However, I will stand behind my comment. With every Android device I've worked with and reflashed (the list is pretty long now: HTC Desire, Z, HD, One X, Moto Defy, Atrix, ZTE Blade and an Ainol Novo7 Aurora) I can quite conclusively say that there are some (I'm not saying all) community-developed ROMs that run faster, more stably and give better battery life than the manufacturer-supplied effort.

I don't think the OEMs are idiots. There are a lot of factors at play here: the OEMs have a billion other things to worry about, and limited amounts of developers given a limited amount of time to work on each device. Plus the cost of developing and testing new software for existing devices, and on top of that - the demands of the carriers. I'd say they also have some commercial incentive not to optimise builds too much when updating older hardware - if the new hardware seems much faster (even if that comes from software enhancements), you're more likely to buy it.

Most of the components in modern devices are chosen 'off the peg' and manufacturers development teams don't necessarily know evey possible optimisation for the platform - as an example: the deeper sleep state enabled in QSD8250 on the Desire by open community devs made a massive difference to battery life at the time with no detrimental effects.

Anyway, if manufacturer shipped ROMs are so perfectly stable and functional and 'the best thing out there', I assume you're running a factory ROM with no other mods - rooted at most??? :P
Last edited by Azurael; 30th April 2012 at 02:29 AM.
30th April 2012, 03:39 AM   |  #22  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 12
 
105 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2009
just noticed u wrote there Artix instead of Atrix
30th April 2012, 05:20 AM   |  #23  
MdX MaxX's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 19
 
199 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2010
More
Best thing about CM9? It has completely stopped my Atrix from randomly rebooting.
30th April 2012, 06:21 AM   |  #24  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 413
 
652 posts
Join Date:Joined: Sep 2011
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by againareku

Unfortunately, many Android lovers tend to believe community devs can do no wrong and corporate devs are slow and retarded.

If so, then why is dev work SO much better when source code, drivers, and official builds are released?

CM9 will be absolutely beyond amazing once official Atrix ICS is out and drivers/source is out.

The source code comes from Google and unless devs are willing to fork Android, which they aren't, they aren't going to modify the source much.

The drivers are proprietary so the hardware manufacturers are in a much better position to release them, then the devs.

The official builds are only useful for the drivers. If Motorola would just release the drivers, the devs don't need the official builds.

So yes CM9 will be much improved when the official ICS is released but that's not because Motorola is better at developing. Having said that, they have completely different objectives so it's not a completely fair comparison. Motorola is much more concerned with stability and maintaining their proprietary modifications.
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes