Simone,

How are your studies going? Are you well?

A request if I may... (If it's a possibility of course).

Could you add a middle-step-frequency option for GPU in the next release? - It would be very useful and quite awesome to have.

I completely respect the intellectual decisions that you make, so whatever you decide is fine by me. I just thought that you'd appreciate the idea.

Originally Posted by hospital349

Simone,

How are your studies going? Are you well?

A request if I may... (If it's a possibility of course).

Could you add a middle-step-frequency option for GPU in the next release? - It would be very useful and quite awesome to have.

I completely respect the intellectual decisions that you make, so whatever you decide is fine by me. I just thought that you'd appreciate the idea.

Hey

All seems going well, just a bit of probs in physics

It is planned to add another step, but it's not a priority for now

There is almost no difference in using another step compared to 100Mhz

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by simone201

Hey

All seems going well, just a bit of probs in physics

It is planned to add another step, but it's not a priority for now

There is almost no difference in using another step compared to 100Mhz

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Thanks buddy.

Keep at it, I know you're constantly working your ass off.

Hi ppl,

on CM9, latest nightly.

As I can see, latest N.E.A.K. is from 5/5/2012.
Do you see any missing feature going from CM9 latest nightly kernel to N.E.A.K. ?
I mean... do you know if something moved on CM9 side meanwhile ?
Or, are they completely equivalent as per features (ofc N.E.A.K. has a lots of different/more things) ?

Thanks

Originally Posted by chareos12

Hi ppl,

on CM9, latest nightly.

As I can see, latest N.E.A.K. is from 5/5/2012.
Do you see any missing feature going from CM9 latest nightly kernel to N.E.A.K. ?
I mean... do you know if something moved on CM9 side meanwhile ?
Or, are they completely equivalent as per features (ofc N.E.A.K. has a lots of different/more things) ?

Thanks

Afaik neak is way more full of features

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

Using latest N.E.A.K. kernel with MIUI - everything is good so far (I'm using it for a couple of weeks, if I'm not mistaken), thanks to simone201

Originally Posted by Joseiyo

I don't know why but it's impossible to me install this Kernel. I've tried by using CWM and ODIN and always have the same result: after the Samsung Galaxy SII logo, screen is black and stops loading; only back and menu keys work and turn leds on. I've tried also install first "clean kernel by nismax" but still the same. I has no problem with GB version of NEAK, any help?

Thanks.

No one please? Isn't it extrange?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by Joseiyo

No one please? Isn't it extrange?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2

Are you sure you choose proper version o NEAK for your rom?

Originally Posted by chareos12

Hi ppl,

on CM9, latest nightly.

As I can see, latest N.E.A.K. is from 5/5/2012.
Do you see any missing feature going from CM9 latest nightly kernel to N.E.A.K. ?
I mean... do you know if something moved on CM9 side meanwhile ?
Or, are they completely equivalent as per features (ofc N.E.A.K. has a lots of different/more things) ?

Thanks

Hi.

I am using the latest N.E.A.K with CM9 10/05/2012 without ANY problems. But to be honestly..i tested 3 other kernel with CM9. But N.E.A.K and the CM9 standard delivered kernel are for me the best at this moment.

No freezes, no SOD ....

Using Hospital349 settings, almost

Originally Posted by ziroxs

Hi.

I am using the latest N.E.A.K with CM9 10/05/2012 without ANY problems. But to be honestly..i tested 3 other kernel with CM9. But N.E.A.K and the CM9 standard delivered kernel are for me the best at this moment.

No freezes, no SOD ....

Using Hospital349 settings, almost

Another happy customer!

The settings that I am using at the moment are slicker than ever. It's as if I wasn't UV'ing at all... although we both know that isn't true.

Can I ask you what adjustments you've had to make to my settings for them to work on your device? (It's strange how every device reacts slightly differently to the settings provided. Some find that they work better than others.)

I recently adjusted the settings further, so if you haven't recently updated, check them out.