Introducing XDA:DevCon – A Conference For Developers By Developers
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum
Forgot your password?
 
Post Reply+
Tip us?
 
orfius christ
Old
#141  
orfius christ's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 13
Posts: 190
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stupifier View Post
Sorry, I have a noob/easy question I need answered. The latest version listed on Incredikernel.com is "2.6.38.8 Incredikernel ICS 03/21/2012". Can that version be used on a Gingerbread ROM? I'm on CM7.2 Gingerbread and saw someone post in the incredikernel forum that its fine to put the latest Stable ICS Incredikernel in (3/21/2012). Safe?
Completely safe

Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA
 
PonsAsinorem
Old
(Last edited by PonsAsinorem; 29th May 2012 at 11:48 PM.)
#142  
PonsAsinorem's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Thanks Meter 988
Posts: 2,421
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hawaii

 
DONATE TO ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stupifier View Post
Sorry, I have a noob/easy question I need answered. The latest version listed on Incredikernel.com is "2.6.38.8 Incredikernel ICS 03/21/2012". Can that version be used on a Gingerbread ROM? I'm on CM7.2 Gingerbread and saw someone post in the incredikernel forum that its fine to put the latest Stable ICS Incredikernel in (3/21/2012). Safe?
Look at the OP, find your kernel version/date, and see what the tag (ICS and/or GB) is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by orfius christ View Post
Completely safe

Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA
I know you answered this, but teach a man to fish...



 

[ROM][UNOFFICIAL] Pons CM10 Inc builds
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL] Pons CM7.2 Inc builds
[ROM][UNOFFICIAL] Pons AOKP JB Inc builds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chainfire View Post
If I had a microwave, you would have won it.
 
omniatic
Old
#143  
omniatic's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 128
Posts: 687
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Milwaukee
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiny4579 View Post
Thanks for the update. Just got home. I was anxious to test tonight as I cherry picked the changes this morning but then a tstorm happens. I'll test soon. Beta2 may happen tonight.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
If you need a tester, I am planning on flashing drk.hd's newest build this evening. May as well test everything at once.

...sorry...I was on the phone...
 
Shano56
Old
#144  
Shano56's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 426
Posts: 1,218
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by omniatic View Post
If you need a tester, I am planning on flashing drk.hd's newest build this evening. May as well test everything at once.

...sorry...I was on the phone...
I plan on doing the same.
LG Nexus 4 (16GB)
Rom: CM10.1 Nightlies

Asus Nexus 7 (8GB)
Rom: CM10.1 Nightlies

HTC Droid Incredible - MP3 Player/Offline Device
Rom: CM10.1 Nightlies (Unofficial)

--Previous Devices--
HTC MyTouch 3G, Archos 80 G9
 
tiny4579
Old
#145  
Recognized Developer - OP
Thanks Meter 2635
Posts: 5,166
Join Date: Jan 2011
mamarley/invisiblek, something about the new commits broke the kernel. Here is the error I'm getting:

Code:
arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c:61:2: warning: #warning "TODO: return_address should use unwind tables"
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c: In function 'msm_timer_sync_smem_clock':
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:366: error: 'SMSM_STATE_TIME_MASTER_DEM' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:366: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:366: error: for each function it appears in.)
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:382: error: 'SMSM_STATE_APPS_DEM' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.o] Error 1
 
invisiblek
Old
#146  
invisiblek's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 1492
Posts: 971
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Minnesota

 
DONATE TO ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiny4579 View Post
mamarley/invisiblek, something about the new commits broke the kernel. Here is the error I'm getting:

Code:
arch/arm/kernel/return_address.c:61:2: warning: #warning "TODO: return_address should use unwind tables"
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c: In function 'msm_timer_sync_smem_clock':
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:366: error: 'SMSM_STATE_TIME_MASTER_DEM' undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:366: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:366: error: for each function it appears in.)
arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c:382: error: 'SMSM_STATE_APPS_DEM' undeclared (first use in this function)
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.o] Error 1
is
smd_private.h
not included in your timer.c by chance?
 
tiny4579
Old
(Last edited by tiny4579; 30th May 2012 at 03:12 AM.)
#147  
Recognized Developer - OP
Thanks Meter 2635
Posts: 5,166
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by invisiblek View Post
is
smd_private.h
not included in your timer.c by chance?
It is and it seems that it's defined and actually timer.c and smd_private.h have not changed since my previous kernel. So I took my working config and pulled it against the new setup and still no change.

EDIT: I think I inadvertently made changes that I didn't even realize that broke crap.

Do you know which changes actually need to be merged to update the drivers? Just the large kgsl commit on page 2 and the two kgsl 3.8 updates on the first page of that github?
 
invisiblek
Old
#148  
invisiblek's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 1492
Posts: 971
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Minnesota

 
DONATE TO ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by tiny4579 View Post
It is and it seems that it's defined and actually timer.c and smd_private.h have not changed since my previous kernel. So I took my working config and pulled it against the new setup and still no change.

EDIT: I think I inadvertently made changes that I didn't even realize that broke crap.

Do you know which changes actually need to be merged to update the drivers? Just the large kgsl commit on page 2 and the two kgsl 3.8 updates on the first page of that github?
cool

no not at all, the only real reason i knew what happened there is i was trying to do it the other night and ended up giving up (like 3am lol)
 
tiny4579
Old
#149  
Recognized Developer - OP
Thanks Meter 2635
Posts: 5,166
Join Date: Jan 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by invisiblek View Post
cool

no not at all, the only real reason i knew what happened there is i was trying to do it the other night and ended up giving up (like 3am lol)
New error for you. I think I can pull this off this time though, lol:

Code:
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno_a2xx.c: In function 'a2xx_cp_intrcallback':
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno_a2xx.c:1639: error: 'TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno_a2xx.c:1639: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno_a2xx.c:1639: error: for each function it appears in.)
I'm sure the issue is the commits were built from tiamat so they probably had some of the necessary commits.

So the fix for this error was to add: #include <linux/sched.h> to the file with the error.

Next error:
Code:
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno.c: In function 'adreno_getchipid':
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno.c:377: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_is_msm8930'
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno.c: In function 'adreno_getproperty':
drivers/gpu/msm/adreno.c:801: error: 'struct kgsl_devinfo' has no member named 'gpu_id'
It's been a while since I did any serious kernel work. Fun...
 
tiny4579
Old
#150  
Recognized Developer - OP
Thanks Meter 2635
Posts: 5,166
Join Date: Jan 2011
Update: Got it to actually build but still working on making it boot.

Nope, no good even on the new build.

Kind of a downer due to the hours spent on this thing.

 
Post Reply+
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Go to top of page...