Originally Posted by RS050377

Is K1-6B better than K1-6?

Why?
Better use the last version.

hi harcore,
when u release the sources of K3-6B? thanks

Originally Posted by giajp

hi harcore,
when u release the sources of K3-6B? thanks

There are no changes in source code between 6 and 6B, only some startup script changes, which are from K1-8. I'll upload them soon.

I had last night until noon today on it the K1-8 Test 3 and so far no problems. Earlier then the new test 5 and just flashed me the phone freezes the whole phone again.

Originally Posted by hardcore

There are no changes in source code between 6 and 6B, only some startup script changes, which are from K1-8. I'll upload them soon.

Yes, but in your repository there's only k3-5 sources

Edit: now also k3-6b! Thank u great

Sent from my iPhone Fu**er S3 using Tapatalk 2

K1-8:
- Added ExFAT support via Samsung's proprietary kernel modules
- Compiled using Codesourcery 2011.03 GCC 4.5.2 toolchain

This is pretty much the same as the earlier K1-8 TEST 3 version.

Originally Posted by hardcore

K1-8:
- Added ExFAT support via Samsung's proprietary kernel modules
- Compiled using Codesourcery 2011.03 GCC 4.5.2 toolchain

This is pretty much the same as the earlier K1-8 TEST 3 version.

Just runned 15 mins of GTA 3 without a single freeze, looks stable to me for now

Originally Posted by AndroidGX

Just runned 15 mins of GTA 3 without a single freeze, looks stable to me for now

Any micro lags? Because for now the best kernel for gaming is the stock kernel.

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2

Originally Posted by ozzyita

Any micro lags? Because for now the best kernel for gaming is the stock kernel.

Depends on what you call "micro lags".
I did 2 benchs of Nenamark2 and obtained 58.8 FPS score, which is exactly what I get with stock kernel aswell

K1-8 is pretty stable. No issue so far.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app