Attend XDA's Second Annual Developer Conference, XDA:DevCon 2014!
5,778,633 Members 37,786 Now Online
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum

[Q] ma7 kernal

Tip us?
 
craign1317
Old
#1  
Member - OP
Thanks Meter 2
Posts: 43
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milwaukee
Default [Q] ma7 kernal

I just used mobile odin to flash the new ma7 no data and my kernal still says oct 3 for the date. Then I tried to flash the zip from rwilcos site and it still says oct 3 2012. Shouldnt it be jan 29th 2013. What am I doing wrong?
 
KEYofR
Old
#2  
KEYofR's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 215
Posts: 570
Join Date: Jun 2010
Default Re: [Q] ma7 kernal

Apparently the posted kernel in the rom/kernel/modem thread isn't right. In the meantime, if you don't want to do the full update.zip, you can install garwynn's ma7 kernel from here:

http://www.sxtpdevelopers.com/showthread.php?t=151

It's actually not exactly the ma7 kernel though. It's the ma7 kernel source, but updated to the latest version of linux, then built and packaged same as ma7. It's good.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
 
craign1317
Old
#3  
Member - OP
Thanks Meter 2
Posts: 43
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milwaukee
Thank you. Downloading now
 
BlueGoldAce
Old
#4  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 69
Posts: 511
Join Date: Jun 2010
Default [Q] ma7 kernal

Any disadvantage to using the kernel you mentioned?

---------- Post added at 10:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:59 PM ----------

Is the above kernel essentially the same as stock?
 
KEYofR
Old
#5  
KEYofR's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 215
Posts: 570
Join Date: Jun 2010
Default Re: [Q] ma7 kernal

I don't know of any disadvantage so far. It's what I'm running.

There could be some problem that no one's noticed yet.

It started out as just the ma7 source from samsung which was based on linux 3.0.31 or so, and he just applied all the incrimental linux patches from there to current 3.0.63 or so. It still has whatever changes samsung had in there. So it should be basically the same in any way we can even detect. The only real difference is he enabled a bunch of different cpu speed governors. You can just ignore that. If you don't use setcpu or similar to pick a different governor then the default one is the same.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
 
BlueGoldAce
Old
#6  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 69
Posts: 511
Join Date: Jun 2010
Default Re: [Q] ma7 kernal

Quote:
Originally Posted by KEYofR View Post
I don't know of any disadvantage so far. It's what I'm running.

There could be some problem that no one's noticed yet.

It started out as just the ma7 source from samsung which was based on linux 3.0.31 or so, and he just applied all the incrimental linux patches from there to current 3.0.63 or so. It still has whatever changes samsung had in there. So it should be basically the same in any way we can even detect. The only real difference is he enabled a bunch of different cpu speed governors. You can just ignore that. If you don't use setcpu or similar to pick a different governor then the default one is the same.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
I noticed the default looked to be on demand. I thought the default for samsung was pegasusq.

So what is the default governor? I also noticed the billy available i/o is noon, deadline, and cfq. Which one do you recommend?

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2
 
KEYofR
Old
(Last edited by KEYofR; 18th February 2013 at 12:16 AM.)
#7  
KEYofR's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 215
Posts: 570
Join Date: Jun 2010
Default Re: [Q] ma7 kernal

You might be right about the samsung stock cpu sched. I don't have a stock kernel anymore to double check. There isn't much harm in just trying different ones and seeing how it goes for a few days.

Default io sched should be cfq and I think that's probably the best except in pretty exotically special cases. But honestly I don't think any will make very much difference on flash vs hard drives. You can google tests that people have run on ssd's to get an idea.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using xda premium
 
swalter718
Old
#8  
swalter718's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 73
Posts: 172
Join Date: Jan 2013
Default Re: [Q] ma7 kernal

There's actually a substantial i/o performance difference between cfq and deadline. IMO, deadline provides superior performance on flash-disks(ssd) paired with multi-core processors. Try deadline for 72 hours and compare for yourself

Sent from an evil, dark place...
~ ROM: JellyBomb v14.0
~ Radio: L900VPAMA7
~ Kernel: Perseus alpha32

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Add Timestamps to Xposed Installer Logs with… Xposed!

If talking about the most interesting projects in the last few years, we must … more

Secrecy Goes Open Source, Assures File Encryption

As some of you may remember, a while back we spoke about Secrecy, an effective file … more

[APK] Google News and Weather Gets Material Design Makeover, Minor Maps Updates

Although Google has somewhat gotten out of the habit of their … more

Software Build Automation with Jenkins – XDA Developer TV

Many members of the XDA community come to learn and begin in the exciting … more