Attend XDA's Second Annual Developer Conference, XDA:DevCon 2014!
5,768,101 Members 42,894 Now Online
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum

[Q] Ultrapixels

Tip us?
 
cold22
Old
#31  
cold22's Avatar
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 1
Posts: 11
Join Date: Jan 2012
Isn't HTC misleading the consumer by using the term 4 Ultrapixel but in fact it 4 Megapixel? or to be more correct shouldn't it be market as 4 Megapixel F2.0?
 
knoxploration
Old
#32  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 563
Posts: 3,311
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Re: [Q] Ultrapixels

Frankly speaking, yes, they are. Why they're doing it is understandable, but the decision to use the term pixel is ill-advised.

Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
Head of an Android household: HTC One X+ International 64GB, HTC One X International 32GB, Google Nexus 10, two hopelessly unstable Asus Eee Pad Transformers (32GB and 16GB, each with keyboard docks; remember -- friends don't let friends buy Asus), Samsung Galaxy Ace, and a Fuhu Nabi 2.
 
TramainM
Old
(Last edited by TramainM; 25th February 2013 at 09:13 AM.)
#33  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 77
Posts: 446
Join Date: Dec 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by danw_oz View Post
The proof of the quality will obviously come, but prelim reviews state that it is not as good as the Nokia.
You must have saw a biased review bud, that camera in HDR mode puts nokia to shame, and in low light the camera is even more stunning. Here is a sight I found with some HTC ONE Shots on it, pretty impressive.

http://www.phonearena.com/news/HTC-O...Nexus-4-sample
 
Shasarak
Old
#34  
Shasarak's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 125
Posts: 1,351
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: London
Quote:
Originally Posted by cold22 View Post
Isn't HTC misleading the consumer by using the term 4 Ultrapixel but in fact it 4 Megapixel? or to be more correct shouldn't it be market as 4 Megapixel F2.0?
Well, it's a marketing term, clearly; what they're trying to do is to get across the fact that one of their megapixels isn't the same as one of someone else's megapixels.

It's not just that the aperture is larger (although it is) it's also that the physical pixel on the sensor is larger. Compared to a 13MP sensor, each pixel is more than three times the area, which means it collects more light. Combined with the larger aperture, that means the picture is much less noisy at the same light level - or achieves the same level of noise with much less light.
 
Dmastax1x
Old
#35  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 8
Posts: 144
Join Date: Oct 2010
can't say much from personal experience, but the pictures in this thread show that the HTC One does NOT have the best smartphone camera. Just sayin

http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=2160567

anyways... once i figure out a way to leave sprint im getting this phone for its overall awesomeness
 
knoxploration
Old
#36  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 563
Posts: 3,311
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Re: [Q] Ultrapixels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shasarak View Post
Well, it's a marketing term, clearly; what they're trying to do is to get across the fact that one of their megapixels isn't the same as one of someone else's megapixels.
Which is a bit disingenuous. Their megapixels are just the same as anybody else's megapixels. They're not making their own sensors and there's no unique tech behind it; they''re just buying an off-the-shelf sensor.

Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
Head of an Android household: HTC One X+ International 64GB, HTC One X International 32GB, Google Nexus 10, two hopelessly unstable Asus Eee Pad Transformers (32GB and 16GB, each with keyboard docks; remember -- friends don't let friends buy Asus), Samsung Galaxy Ace, and a Fuhu Nabi 2.
 
Riyal
Old
#37  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 1650
Posts: 2,871
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Iloilo City

 
DONATE TO ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxploration View Post
Which is a bit disingenuous. Their megapixels are just the same as anybody else's megapixels. They're not making their own sensors and there's no unique tech behind it; they''re just buying an off-the-shelf sensor.

Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
It's not a off the shelf sensor. I agree with them that it is indeed a special sensor they are using. The only issue with the technology they implemented is yes it is unique and is on the right path but is not enough to compete with the 2013 cameras.
 
knoxploration
Old
#38  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 563
Posts: 3,311
Join Date: Apr 2011
Default Re: [Q] Ultrapixels

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riyal View Post
It's not a off the shelf sensor.
Want to put some money on that? What expertise does HTC have in sensor design and fabbing?

They are almost certainly buying it in.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riyal View Post
I agree with them that it is indeed a special sensor they are using. The only issue with the technology they implemented is yes it is unique and is on the right path but is not enough to compete with the 2013 cameras.
Please, enlighten us. What is "special" or "unique"?

It's not the first 2um pixel. We've seen those before.

It's not the first 2um pixel in a phone. We've seen those before, too. (And larger.)

It's not a newly-developed technology. (It's a standard backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, just with fewer and larger pixels than are *currently* common.)

It is, essentially, the same technology everybody else is using, but with the pixel sizes and pixel counts everybody was using a few years ago.

That's not unique, or even close to it. Unusual or different, yes. Better, arguably it could be for some important metrics; it will without question be worse for other important metrics. (It's a trade-off, like most things in life.) But it's not unique.

Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
Head of an Android household: HTC One X+ International 64GB, HTC One X International 32GB, Google Nexus 10, two hopelessly unstable Asus Eee Pad Transformers (32GB and 16GB, each with keyboard docks; remember -- friends don't let friends buy Asus), Samsung Galaxy Ace, and a Fuhu Nabi 2.
 
Riyal
Old
#39  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 1650
Posts: 2,871
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Iloilo City

 
DONATE TO ME
Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxploration View Post
Want to put some money on that? What expertise does HTC have in sensor design and fabbing?

They are almost certainly buying it in.



Please, enlighten us. What is "special" or "unique"?

It's not the first 2um pixel. We've seen those before.

It's not the first 2um pixel in a phone. We've seen those before, too. (And larger.)

It's not a newly-developed technology. (It's a standard backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, just with fewer and larger pixels than are *currently* common.)

It is, essentially, the same technology everybody else is using, but with the pixel sizes and pixel counts everybody was using a few years ago.

That's not unique, or even close to it. Unusual or different, yes. Better, arguably it could be for some important metrics; it will without question be worse for other important metrics. (It's a trade-off, like most things in life.) But it's not unique.

Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
Right now I can't prove that I am just basing facts on HTC's statements. And I doubt they would lie we are not living in an age where people are ignorant yet on technology and I am sure HTC would be aware of the ever increasing techy people doing the reviews on blogs. And that is a big let down on their marketing if ever they are telling lies. Hence let's wait for the kernel source to look up what are they really using.
 
superchilpil
Old
#40  
superchilpil's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter 1209
Posts: 3,759
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas

 
DONATE TO ME
Default Re: [Q] Ultrapixels

Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxploration View Post
Want to put some money on that? What expertise does HTC have in sensor design and fabbing?

They are almost certainly buying it in.



Please, enlighten us. What is "special" or "unique"?

It's not the first 2um pixel. We've seen those before.

It's not the first 2um pixel in a phone. We've seen those before, too. (And larger.)

It's not a newly-developed technology. (It's a standard backside-illuminated CMOS sensor, just with fewer and larger pixels than are *currently* common.)

It is, essentially, the same technology everybody else is using, but with the pixel sizes and pixel counts everybody was using a few years ago.

That's not unique, or even close to it. Unusual or different, yes. Better, arguably it could be for some important metrics; it will without question be worse for other important metrics. (It's a trade-off, like most things in life.) But it's not unique.

Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
I'm not disagreeing but can you give an example of a phone with a similar or larger pixel?



Slithered from my HTC One X+
=========================

AT&T HTC One

Help me fill up my thanks meter by hitting thanks
==================================================

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes