Lollipop for OnePlus One Enters Testing Stage

Cyanogen just announced on their twitter that their CyanogenMod Lollipop build for the OnePlus … more

Xiaomi Business Model Unlike Usually Conceived

This article explains how Xiaomi sells phones not just to be a mobile OEM, but also to seed … more

Note 4 Launcher Theme Collection

If you like the features and integration of the TouchWiz Launcher on your Note 4, FrenchFamousTeam put … more

Verizon Allows Customers to Opt Out of Supercookies

Following the controversy that Verizon’s zombie “supercookies” … more

Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

Will cheap laptop be powerful enough to tabcast video?

OP AleT

21st March 2014, 06:45 PM   |  #1  
OP Member
Flag London
Thanks Meter: 4
 
34 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2006
More
I am in the market for a cheap laptop, but having recently acquired a chromecast, I'd like it to be powerful enough to tabcast HD video.

Many of the cheaper machines have an i5-4200U processor. This has a 1.6GHz clock speed, with a turbo mode speed of 2.6GHz.

The tabcasting min specs say 2GHz for an i5, so I'm not sure whether the i5-4200U would be powerful enough.

Has anyone here tried one?
21st March 2014, 07:11 PM   |  #2  
bhiga's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Thanks Meter: 909
 
2,289 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2010
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by AleT

I am in the market for a cheap laptop, but having recently acquired a chromecast, I'd like it to be powerful enough to tabcast HD video.

Many of the cheaper machines have an i5-4200U processor. This has a 1.6GHz clock speed, with a turbo mode speed of 2.6GHz.

The tabcasting min specs say 2GHz for an i5, so I'm not sure whether the i5-4200U would be powerful enough.

Has anyone here tried one?

Difficult to say. If your intent is to tab-cast a video, I would say that's probably not enough CPU horsepower.
The minimum tab-casting spec is likely just for casting a static tab (like a web page), not including the additional CPU load for video playback.

Do you have a specific use case in mind?
21st March 2014, 07:28 PM   |  #3  
OP Member
Flag London
Thanks Meter: 4
 
34 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jun 2006
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhiga

Difficult to say. If your intent is to tab-cast a video, I would say that's probably not enough CPU horsepower.
The minimum tab-casting spec is likely just for casting a static tab (like a web page), not including the additional CPU load for video playback.

Do you have a specific use case in mind?

Hi,

I want to cast sites that don't yet have casting enabled natively, like like itvplayer, BTSport and 4od (UK only). Mainly flash based video.

I can cast a static tab using a ~6yr old celeron laptop, but if I try one of these video sites, it stutters and tells me my computer may not be fast enough.

The minimum spec I quoted is from https://support.google.com/chromecas.../3209990?hl=en, and refers to tabcasting high quality video.
21st March 2014, 07:37 PM   |  #4  
bhiga's Avatar
Recognized Contributor
Thanks Meter: 909
 
2,289 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2010
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by AleT

Hi,

I want to cast sites that don't yet have casting enabled natively, like like itvplayer, BTSport and 4od (UK only). Mainly flash based video.

I can cast a static tab using a ~6yr old celeron laptop, but if I try one of these video sites, it stutters and tells me my computer may not be fast enough.

The minimum spec I quoted is from https://support.google.com/chromecas.../3209990?hl=en, and refers to tabcasting high quality video.

Ahh, I see. Then you might be okay, though it's always nice to have more "headroom."
Definitely make sure you have 4 GB or more RAM and of course 64-bit Windows, rather than 32-bit.
Best if the hardware can provide hardware acceleration for Flash as well.
21st March 2014, 08:16 PM   |  #5  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 106
 
343 posts
Join Date:Joined: Oct 2013
I tab-cast from my desktop system, i5-3570K 4.2 GHz. It still stutters slightly, no difference at 720p or 480p, even though the overall CPU utilization stays low. I keep retesting with each new update of the Google Cast extension, but there hasn't been any improvement.

Plex can cast the same video stream to the Chromecast from the same desktop computer without stuttering. It's just poor coding by Google.
24th March 2014, 07:14 PM   |  #6  
Senior Member
Flag Toronto
Thanks Meter: 486
 
3,143 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2010
More
Raw GHz isn't really the best measure of performance anyway. The i5 notebook will definitely be good enough for 480p, not sure about HD. Also Windows 8.1 supports wireless screen sharing so if you can find an affordable receiver you'd get smoother results that way.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
24th March 2014, 09:43 PM   |  #7  
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 332
 
1,921 posts
Join Date:Joined: Dec 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJames1

I tab-cast from my desktop system, i5-3570K 4.2 GHz. It still stutters slightly, no difference at 720p or 480p, even though the overall CPU utilization stays low. I keep retesting with each new update of the Google Cast extension, but there hasn't been any improvement.

Plex can cast the same video stream to the Chromecast from the same desktop computer without stuttering. It's just poor coding by Google.

The stuttering with Tab Casting has more to do with the method they are using to stream as it does the power of the machine doing the streaming...

Tab Casting is (I Think it is anyway) using an M-JPEG to stream to the CCast...

Which is just what it sounds like sending JPG frames in series like it's some sort of Webcam.

Post Reply Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes