FORUMS

Android 5.1.1 Omni ROM For Motorola Xoom

Back in Feb 2011, the Motorola Xoom became the first device to be sold with Android 3.0 … more

CleanSlate Brings Fingerprint Scanner Mod to HTC One M9+

Work of XDA Recognized Developer tbalden, CleanSlate custom kernel for the HTC … more

Sunday Debate: Which Factors Caused HTC’s Woes?

Join us in a fun Sunday Debate on HTC’s situation. Come with your … more

HTC’s New Ad Campaign And What It Really Means

HTC has just released three new blind test adverts comparing app loading … more

CVE-2014-0973: Possible Bootloader Unlock?

280 posts
Thanks Meter: 138
 
By eragon5779, Senior Member on 18th June 2014, 07:21 AM
Thread Closed Subscribe to Thread Email Thread
18th June 2014, 09:39 PM |#21  
thewebsiteisdown's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 59
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by vacaloca

Even if Samsung has their own source tree for lk/aboot, it's wouldn't be surprising that (a) they already know about this and (b) they might have patched it already in their own sources. The real question is if it's patched in the binary that's on the phone.. and the way to figure that out is to disassemble the code knowing what you're looking for. And no, I do not care to do this.. I'm not qualified to.. because I know people will ask


It was just reported within the last week so I doubt they knew about it, just saying.
Last edited by thewebsiteisdown; 18th June 2014 at 11:05 PM.
 
 
18th June 2014, 11:36 PM |#22  
eragon5779's Avatar
OP Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 138
 
Donate to Me
More
https://mobile.twitter.com/TeamAndIR...03406955433984

Sent from my ROOTED white SM-G900V using XDA Premium 4
The Following User Says Thank You to eragon5779 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
19th June 2014, 12:16 AM |#23  
Dennisg34's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag New Hampshire
Thanks Meter: 512
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by eragon5779

https://mobile.twitter.com/TeamAndIR...03406955433984

Sent from my ROOTED white SM-G900V using XDA Premium 4

Oh well, it's always fun getting a little excitement:-p

And on a side note, kinda mean for him to say something 99% of the community doesn't quite know, so just a simple "no" is better.

Sent from my SM-G900V using XDA Free mobile app
The Following User Says Thank You to Dennisg34 For This Useful Post: [ View ]
19th June 2014, 02:10 AM |#24  
thewebsiteisdown's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 59
 
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dennisg34

Oh well, it's always fun getting a little excitement:-p

And on a side note, kinda mean for him to say something 99% of the community doesn't quite know, so just a simple "no" is better.

Sent from my SM-G900V using XDA Free mobile app


Yeah that was pretty rude of him wasnt it? Wow, great communicator to the crowd that one...
19th June 2014, 02:29 AM |#25  
garwynn's Avatar
Forum Moderator / Recognized Developer
Flag Chi-town
Thanks Meter: 8,193
 
Donate to Me
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewebsiteisdown

Yeah that was pretty rude of him wasnt it? Wow, great communicator to the crowd that one...

Think about it this way. There are two ways to handle when this situation arises
1) Identify the specific thread or user and say something, effectively calling them out.
2) Use a generalization to get the same point across (aka tact)

Keep in mind people are probably spamming him and @djrbliss to crazy town on these.
Professionally he did communicate that well. It gets the message across without singling anyone out.

So, in summary, it's being said that this can't be exploited by a known security expert.
Let's call it a day on this one unless something changes that.
Thank you for your time.
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to garwynn For This Useful Post: [ View ]
Thread Closed Subscribe to Thread
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes