Welcome to XDA

Search to go directly to your device's forum

Register an account

Unlock full posting privileges

Ask a question

No registration required
Post Reply

[2013.07.03] CF-Bench v1.3

OP Chainfire

9th April 2014, 06:59 PM   |  #311  
chrisb906's Avatar
Senior Member
Thanks Meter: 128
 
1,434 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jan 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rad ryan

My bad, I thought you were on a SGS4 That is a great score for the Desire HD I imagine

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

Yes... No. Lol

Sent from my One X using Tapatalk
21st May 2014, 09:53 AM   |  #312  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
2 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2014
CF-Bench / Native Disk Write - accuracy
Hei,

browsing the scores through and doing some trialling of my own as well, there's an issue I think with the Native disk write score. It seems to be all over the place and several devices report scores between 4-12 points or so. I do not think those devices are that slow. Could the benchmark be explained for that part, what does it do and how does it measure the performance?
21st May 2014, 11:51 AM   |  #313  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter: 0
 
2 posts
Join Date:Joined: May 2014
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakiiski

Hei,

browsing the scores through and doing some trialling of my own as well, there's an issue I think with the Native disk write score. It seems to be all over the place and several devices report scores between 4-12 points or so. I do not think those devices are that slow. Could the benchmark be explained for that part, what does it do and how does it measure the performance?

I did some more trials on this and turns out it's depending on some of the tunables, most notably in my case it is highly dependent on the background dirty bytes. I.e. if I set that to be a of a high value I get good scores - so seems this benchmark is not doing a flush() on the file operations and thus it's really not measuring the true file system speed to the actual end memory/disk device. It's testing more of what happens in the filesystem caches.

You can try it out yourself, all you need is adb connection.

cd /proc/sys/vm

echo 5 >dirty_background_ratio

or you can also set the absolute byte value, too.

echo 10485760 >dirty_background_bytes

the original values depend on what your version of Linux/Android has written originally to those. You set either the ratio or bytes, not both at the same time.
11th June 2014, 12:51 PM   |  #314  
kayrowl91's Avatar
Member
Flag puchong
Thanks Meter: 6
 
64 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jul 2012
More
unbelievable score. beats all phone with my cheap mediatek SoC

Sent from my Lenovo A850+ using XDA Free mobile app
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	1402483814624.jpg
Views:	316
Size:	58.2 KB
ID:	2792248  
31st October 2014, 10:59 PM   |  #315  
TiVON's Avatar
Senior Member
Flag Gotham
Thanks Meter: 143
 
227 posts
Join Date:Joined: Aug 2014
More
Quote:
Originally Posted by kayrowl91

unbelievable score. beats all phone with my cheap mediatek SoC

Sent from my Lenovo A850+ using XDA Free mobile app

Versus my OnePlus One with one of the latest and fastest chip on the market and 3 gigs of RAM...

And that's why you shouldn't trust benchmarks

Verstuurd vanaf mijn One A0001 met Tapatalk
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	uploadfromtaptalk1414789098573.jpg
Views:	202
Size:	134.2 KB
ID:	2993391  
14th November 2014, 06:09 PM   |  #316  
kayrowl91's Avatar
Member
Flag puchong
Thanks Meter: 6
 
64 posts
Join Date:Joined: Jul 2012
More
yep. lol! maybe they multiply each core result.thats why im getting 60k result.
Post Reply Subscribe to Thread

Tags
benchmark
Previous Thread Next Thread
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes