No. It is not about JFS or ext4 but about RFS or rather the wrongly set mount options in ULTK kernels. So no change in lagfix perspectives. JFS is still "unsafe" (or as safe as it ever was)
No. It is not about JFS or ext4 but about RFS or rather the wrongly set mount options in ULTK kernels. So no change in lagfix perspectives. JFS is still "unsafe" (or as safe as it ever was)
Hi zenkinz,
Just wanted to say that I love your work. Just one thing that I noticed, in ver. 30 and 31. there is more battery drain than in ver. 23 (at least for me). I'm now using ver 31 because of the /system bug, but I must admit that I loved ver 23.
I use Ultimate Juice, because SuperPower didn't work for me (I might try it again just to be sure) and wanted to ask what is your opinion about that?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining, just wanted to give some user feedback.
Thanks again for your work!
zenkinz: Hi, i have a problem. When i flash latest version of your kernel, my phone didnt boot. Phone stuck at screen with white letters "samsung Galaxy S i9000....." When i flash back to build 30, phone boots ok. Iam using all partitions ext4 lagfix without loop device...Is it neccessary disable lagfix before flashing latest kernel?
Sorry for my poor english
I found user.log in /system stating:
/sbin/post-init.sh: cd: line 214: can't cd to sbin/init.d
Tue Nov 23 07:31:10 CET 2010 USER EARLY INIT START
Tue Nov 23 07:31:10 CET 2010 USER EARLY INIT DONE
Tue Nov 23 07:31:10 CET 2010 USER INIT START
Tue Nov 23 07:31:10 CET 2010 USER INIT DONE
mount: mounting /dev/block/stl9 on /system failed: Device or resource busy
what superpower settings did you try? also, the HZ values have changed from 23 to 31. i'm getting 2-3 days with normal usage and superpower installed. i don't have setcpu or any voltage app installed either.
Hi Tokyogtr, just wondering if you are running the updated Zenkin kernel?
If I flash the new kernal released today, will my battery stats reset and will need to go through the procedures to condition my battery again? Thanks in advance
I tried older version, so I installed 0.75 few minutes ago to try it again. I have setcpu and have profile for screen off (100-400, have no slow wake up or similar problems) There are far to many settings in superpower, but I'm quite sure that my settings should be good because most of them are similar to settings in Juice Defender. Maybe it's because of doc's v.8.0.1. which I started to use few days ago...
EDIT: My battery lasted for about two days earlier, now one day only. Huge difference.
Right after running Supercurios RFS fix (ran successfully) and flashing YA-OK build 31, these lines still appear in user.log. Still, phone boots perfectly normal, so this does NOT seem to be related to a RFS corruption or the Force Close i feel during boot when lagfixed.
Reapplied Voodoo lagfix from recovery, and immediately Force Closes during boot returned. So i will have to investigate further.
remove setcpu and do not do any sort of cpu scaling. just run it as is and trust the system to manage the cpu for you. it will run lightning fast, be very stable and use less power. yes, superpower is complicated with it's settings and you have to set stuff up to trigger in the right order too but once it's done it's perfect.
zenkinz: Hi, i have a problem. When i flash latest version of your kernel, my phone didnt boot. Phone stuck at screen with white letters "samsung Galaxy S i9000....." When i flash back to build 30, phone boots ok. Iam using all partitions ext4 lagfix without loop device...Is it neccessary disable lagfix before flashing latest kernel?
Sorry for my poor english
Cool! But how about the OC? Does it works well too? I'm interested in this kernal, cuz of the OC function actually
Sorry, but be quit please.
As far as I know, K10x kernels work with jpu and non-jpu rom. And they are jpm-sources based...
With JPU rom,we can use
- K10J (JPM-based + XXJPU modules)
- K11-XXJPU (XXJPU stock kbased + some tweak, 2e bootloader, ecc..)
Now, my question was: and what about this kernel?
The answer "because Samsung has not released sources, yet" I think it isn't correct at all (see above other kernel status). Or not?
I really like your kernel, the performance of the phone is awesome and it has so far been the best kernel I've ever used.
There's only a slight problem I have (not sure about others)
My GPS is somewhat useless with this kernel! No sat lock even after about 10mins!
Takes about 4 or 5 mins to even find 3-4 sats! Use to have ~30sec locks indoors with Hardcore's kernel.
Don't really know if it's me or others are having the same issue...
Thank you so much for this kernel!
Keep up the good work.