|KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP>>6.8 || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Search This thread

andronikal659

Senior Member
Sep 28, 2011
710
117
Montreal
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

Does this support 64gb sdcard? I've been looking for a kernel for 64gb aosp for the longest time.

Sent from my SGH-I317M using xda app-developers app
 

brosenz

Senior Member
May 5, 2010
617
49
US
Google Pixel 7 Pro
I just installed ForceKernel (OC TO 1,920Mhz) with CM 10.1. Then I run some benchmarks and it's much slower than Perseus, I used to get in Perseus around 7,500 in Quadrant and now I get between 5,500 to 6,500, am I doing something wrong ?

NOTE: I am using SetCPU and the Governor is "pegasusq"
 

wase4711

Senior Member
May 9, 2010
13,478
6,559
Outside of Phoenix, AZ
I just installed ForceKernel (OC TO 1,920Mhz) with CM 10.1. Then I run some benchmarks and it's much slower than Perseus, I used to get in Perseus around 7,500 in Quadrant and now I get between 5,500 to 6,500, am I doing something wrong ?

NOTE: I am using SetCPU and the Governor is "pegasusq"

Yes, caring about benchmarks is just "wrong"..absolutely meaningless information..
 
  • Like
Reactions: digitalcrash

digitalcrash

Senior Member
Jan 7, 2011
407
52
Mount Airy
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

I just installed ForceKernel (OC TO 1,920Mhz) with CM 10.1. Then I run some benchmarks and it's much slower than Perseus, I used to get in Perseus around 7,500 in Quadrant and now I get between 5,500 to 6,500, am I doing something wrong ?

NOTE: I am using SetCPU and the Governor is "pegasusq"

It is also known that quad scores on 4.1.2 are higher than 4.2 but that doesn't mean anything.

Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
 

Cab121

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
390
198
Dallas
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

Extreme battery life, enlightened cpu performance, otherworldly multitasking capacity and stability these are the ways of master ptmr3 and the Force.

Quadrant scoring without proper OS, no control benching, inaccurate data or no logging with version changes, or even rom version pre testing vs kernel lead down the dark path.

If you feel it's slower then please help with your opinion. Post hard data current detailed stats with rom information and versions apps and so on. With out data to compare all that gets posted is a wasted opinion in a development thread.

Thanks for the great work! Or work of greatness?
 
Last edited:

ptmr3

Inactive Recognized Developer
Feb 10, 2012
8,622
20,986
Aurora
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

Ok .. Pardon my dumb, but I just read the whole thread and didn't see anything about this.

What are the differences (if any) between the 2.3 and 4.3 versions?

Change log in the op

Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app
 

otisman

Senior Member
May 12, 2012
2,440
3,029
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

Oh boy this badboy works wonders on dagr 4.2.2 ROM buttah smooth my bradah much alohas Rob

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
 
  • Like
Reactions: ptmr3

ssewk2x

Senior Member
Oct 24, 2010
1,381
1,392
Detroit, MI
OnePlus 8T
Google Pixel 8 Pro
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

Change log in the op

Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app

Yeah, I see the change log. Like I said, I read the whole thread.

I also see that both files were generated within minutes of each other. I also see that there is zero mention of these version numbers in any post. Therefore, it doesn't necessarily follow that one is simply an older version - especially given the first thing I mentioned.
 

tybowski

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2012
55
11
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

hey guys seems the kernel is not scaling properly. stuck on 1800 and on the on demand gov. can change gov but stays on 1.8. is it something I've done or a known issue?

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2
 

ptmr3

Inactive Recognized Developer
Feb 10, 2012
8,622
20,986
Aurora
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

hey guys seems the kernel is not scaling properly. stuck on 1800 and on the on demand gov. can change gov but stays on 1.8. is it something I've done or a known issue?

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2

May want to redownload/reflash. No issues at all here but I always use pegasusq. Its like on demand gone superhero lol

Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app
 

tybowski

Senior Member
Jan 9, 2012
55
11
Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

will do. I'll try Pegasus to. thanks for the quick response

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2
 

MissyKoneko

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2013
629
264
Bleh
Super noob here, so I just wanna make sure I do it right, so I download, then do I need to flash all over again my rom, gapps and kernel or can I just flash kernel? and do I need to wipe or not? and after flashing what do I do next?

---------- Post added at 02:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:56 PM ----------

Oh btw I am using Luquid Rom.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 28
    warrior-Copy_zpsf4ecd29c.png





    ForceKernel
    This Kernel Is Compatible with most AOSP based JB ROMS for this device-- (Not TW/Samsung Base)​




    READ, READ, READ before downloading, flashing, or posting questions



    Not all phones are created equal meaning some phones will not handle Overclocking or Undervolting as well as others.




    Features
    Kernel Version 3.0.61
    OC to 1920
    4.7 Linaro toolchain
    Advanced Power Emulation
    Added Governors=
    -Lazy
    -Lulzactive
    -Hotplug
    -Adaptive
    Added Shedulers=
    -bfq
    -sio
    -vr
    -zen
    Default Scheduler= Cfq
    Default Governor= Pegasusq
    Default boot set to 1600
    Ramdisk Mods to support Custom Boot Animations




    Github

    In my GITHUB you can find my sources and code changes





    Credits
    Samsung for Official Source Code
    Andreilux
    Faux123
    Cmenard
    Simone 201
    Gregkh
    Sarcastillo
    Cyanogen



    Instructions
    TWRP Recovery HIGHLY Recommended!

    -Download Kernel
    -Nandroid
    -Flash Kernel
    -Boot system and DO NOT TOUCH FOR 2-3 MIN









    Changelog
    Code:
    6.8 2|25
    - Compatibility
    - Sound Work
    
    5 2|25
    - bcmdhd
    - Sound Edits
    - Added Wolfson Audio (No control app yet)
    
    2|15 --
    Increased USB Charge Rate
    Updated To Brand New Linux 3.0.64!
    
    2|12 --
    OC 1920
    Added Lazy Governor
    Added Lulzactive Gov
    Added Hotplug Gov
    Added Adaptive Gov
    Added Zen Sched
    Added BFQv5 Sched
    Added SIO Sched
    Added V(R) Sched
    Set ReadAhead to 1024
    Fixed Wonky Frequencies: No Issues With 3rd Party Apps Holding Freq
    Voltage Edits
    MORE





    HTML:
    Note To Donators!
    
    Every donation is more than appreciated! To show my appreciation for my
     supporters, I will now begin listing every Donator in the OP as a special
     thank you. 
    
    
    THANK YOU







    Special Thanks To The Following Supporters Of This Kernel











    Downloads

    ForceKernel_6.8-- Download Here

    ForceKernel_5-- Download Here

    ForceKernel_4.3-- Download Here

    ForceKernel_2.3-- Download Here


    8
    Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

    Now that this bs has gotten nice and out of hand, I would appreciate if the off topic whining came to an end. Mods will he contacted if need be


    Have a great day

    Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app
    7
    Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP>>6.8 || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|25

    OK guys new plan. I will make a new kernel that is compatible with the new Mali edits. But Force kernel is much faster the way it is and will co tinue this way. If it works awesome, if it doesn't, flash my builds :)

    Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app
    5
    Re: |KERNEL| ForceKernel>>AOSP || 1920mhz ||3.0.64|| 2|15

    I could use logic, or I could ask and be certain before I flash a kernel to my device.

    It wouldn't take much to reference the version number of the kernel with the corresponding change log. It seems far more common for guys to only post their most current updated version. Apparently you post and link all versions as you update. Having never used any of your work I wasn't aware of that.

    So yeah logic could of led to an educated guess to the kernel versions but I think it's ridiculous that you made an issue answering a simple question that was asked twice... someone besides me. Again why not have a concrete answer for something like flashing a kernel? You posted two versions with links and no description of either, with version numbers not referenced any where in your post. Nice job being condescending too, can't say I'm surprised you restored to that.

    Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2

    No issue was made, no condescension. Just simple guidance. I leave previous versions posted for those that want to tinker with older things, or like one over the other. Regardless. You asked a question. I pointed you to the answer... You asked again, I quoted your answer, you asked AGAIN and I broke it down for you... Now you are upset and being disrespectful. Please leave and do not use this kernel. Thank you

    Sent from my SGH-T889 using xda app-developers app