[18 Apr 2014] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark results

Status
Not open for further replies.
Search This thread
By:
Advanced…
D

dandu

Member
Mar 17, 2008
42
10
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

It's "Cool tool"

Odesláno z mého GT-I9100 pomocí Tapatalk 2
 
  • Like
Reactions: hanifh
D

dorie365

Member
Dec 23, 2011
5
2
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Yeah cool tool. I can monitor what program does eat a lot of battery when idle or running and if I have found one I'll uninstalling or freeze it.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
 
  • Like
Reactions: hanifh
P

PholkLorr

Senior Member
Dec 13, 2011
74
13
It_ler said:
Not yet. But I have already downloaded it.
It's on my kernels-to-test list.

Sent from my SGS2 (GT-I9100) via xda-app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

7.49 is out so dont need to test 7.48.
I myself used 7.48 for a few hrs. It is EXTREMELY unstable. 3 hangs in the span of 4 hrs of it just sitting on my bed doing nothing with default settings.

EDIT: Reflashed back to 7.45 (most stable version for me so far) after using 7.49 for 1 minute. Wifi doesnt work.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NoRulesForMe
Thisnameisepic

Thisnameisepic

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2013
340
808
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

lt_ler when you test dorimanx 7.49 enable force gpu rendering in developer settings. It's recommended by dorimanx himself in order to avoid issues and some say it helps battery too.

Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100
ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD
Kernel: Siyah v6 b5
Modem: XXLS8
External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

Press thanks if this post helped you :)
Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk 2
 
  • Like
Reactions: It_ler
bobdoblo

bobdoblo

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2012
6,963
19,662
Re: [23 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

It_ler said:
Not yet. But I have already downloaded it.
It's on my kernels-to-test list.

Sent from my SGS2 (GT-I9100) via xda-app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Only problem with testing Dorimanx, by the time you finish the test two more versions get released making the one you tested a waste of time:banghead::D

*NeatROM*
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deni_NS and jackbauer2411
It_ler

It_ler

Recognized Contributor
Aug 23, 2011
12,504
17,301
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S10
It_ler said:
Jeboo v2.1:
Bad battery life in night use.
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 2,4%
Maybe it was a bad night for the kernel and/or my phone ... will do re-test to confirm the result.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Re-test Jeboo v2.1:
Way better battery life on second battery cycle in night use.
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
Excellent deep sleep ratio.
Maybe the battery stats chip was not settled down correctly on first run.

EDIT:
Added some screenshots:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-10-16-50.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-10-16-50.jpg
    32.4 KB · Views: 169
  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-10-17-22.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-10-17-22.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 171
  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-10-17-27.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-10-17-27.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 168
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lam30, jackbauer2411, Thisnameisepic and 2 others
J

jackbauer2411

Senior Member
Jun 15, 2011
130
159
Dortmund, Germany
It_ler said:
Re-test Jeboo v2.1:
Way better battery life on second battery cycle in night use.
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
Excellent deep sleep ratio.
Maybe the battery stats chip was not settled down correctly on first run.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

This sounds better :D I'm using Jeboo v2.1 for a few days now and the bad results in your tests were surprising as for me it is very battery friendly :)
 
It_ler

It_ler

Recognized Contributor
Aug 23, 2011
12,504
17,301
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S10
jackbauer2411 said:
This sounds better :D I'm using Jeboo v2.1 for a few days now and the bad results in your tests were surprising as for me it is very battery friendly :)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Yes, sometimes I have to re-do the battery tests.
Needs some time ... but this way I hope I get better/more reliable and comparable results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jackbauer2411 and bobdoblo
It_ler

It_ler

Recognized Contributor
Aug 23, 2011
12,504
17,301
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S10
It_ler said:
Jeboo v2.1:
Bad battery life in mixed usage too.
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,60% per hour, Wifi: 15,2%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,44%
I will re-do the battery test, just to verify my results.
Seems that my phone does not like this Jeboo version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Re-test Jeboo v2.1:
Also better battery life in mixed usage on second run.
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 18,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
It's ok, but not the best I had on XWLSD on my phone.

Here are some screenhsots:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-23.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-23.jpg
    33.1 KB · Views: 466
  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-29.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-29.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 474
  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-35.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-35.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 468
  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-41.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-14-20-41.jpg
    22.2 KB · Views: 467
  • Like
Reactions: jackbauer2411, bobdoblo, NoRulesForMe and 1 other person
It_ler

It_ler

Recognized Contributor
Aug 23, 2011
12,504
17,301
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S10
PhilZ-touch v4.64:
I flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v4.64 (signed / not the fixed version) on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.
It is very stable and smooth on my phone.
Everything works fine (GPS, wifi, bluetooth, camera, video recording, gallery, video layer, live thumbnails, custom boot animation, etc.).

Excellent battery life in night use.
PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
It's nearly the same as my best result so far (for XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2 on stock/PhilZ kernel too) ... with nearly the same fantastic deep sleep ratio.
If its battery life in mixed usage is also that good, I have to think about staying a while on this kernel.
My phone seems to like this kernel ... fits very good to my personal usage/needs so far.

EDIT:
Added some screenshots:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2013-02-25-09-49-22.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-25-09-49-22.jpg
    33.5 KB · Views: 253
  • Screenshot_2013-02-25-09-49-45.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-25-09-49-45.jpg
    27.5 KB · Views: 250
  • Screenshot_2013-02-25-09-49-51.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-25-09-49-51.jpg
    18.1 KB · Views: 247
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ciprigeorgiu, jackbauer2411, bobdoblo and 8 others
It_ler

It_ler

Recognized Contributor
Aug 23, 2011
12,504
17,301
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S10
oskarpp3 said:
Hello It`ler,

great to hear about last Philz - Kernel. Will give it a try soon.
But the new speedmod is released

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2140192&page=24

Maybe you can give it a try also.

And thanks for your hard work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Yes, already downloaded the latest SpeedMod kernel.
It's based on the latest JB sources ... so it will have the Exynos exploit patched :fingers-crossed:
Maybe some more advantages compared to the stock kernel ... I am curious now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Sale_
Thisnameisepic

Thisnameisepic

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2013
340
808
lt_ler, I got similar results! Philz is the best for battery life without any tweaks imo. Here is my first cycle on it

Thisnameisepic said:
My first cycle after modifying Neatrom Lite 4.3 LSD from bobdoblo's super Lite guide. (Link in my sig). Using stock Philz 4.64 kernel!

5h screen on
1h 30 mins YouTube
About 300mb wifi downloading
Tapatalk
Some games for 20 mins
Surfing using dolphin browser for 15 mins
Titanium backup
Es file explorer
It's medium to heavy usage for me
Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100
ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD or AllianceROM v7.01 LSD
Kernel: Siyah v6 b5
Modem: XXLS8
External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

NeatROM SUPER Lite(developed by salesale, modified by bobdoblo)
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38372709&postcount=34296

Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse



Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100
ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD or AllianceROM v7.01 LSD
Kernel: Siyah v6 b5
Modem: XXLS8
External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

NeatROM SUPER Lite(developed by salesale, modified by bobdoblo)
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38372709&postcount=34296

Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk 2
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-15-47-01.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-15-47-01.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 307
  • Screenshot_2013-02-24-15-47-19.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-24-15-47-19.jpg
    44.3 KB · Views: 297
  • Like
Reactions: Hilmesh and mr_zuff
bobdoblo

bobdoblo

Senior Member
Apr 26, 2012
6,963
19,662
Re: [25 Feb 2013] [KERNEL TESTS] [SAMMY ROMS] Kernel battery tests and benchmark resu

Thisnameisepic said:
lt_ler, I got similar results! Philz is the best for battery life without any tweaks imo. Here is my first cycle on it





Phone: Samsung Galaxy S2 GT-9100
ROM: NeatROM Lite 4.3 LSD or AllianceROM v7.01 LSD
Kernel: Siyah v6 b5
Modem: XXLS8
External: SANDISK 32GB CLASS 10

THE RED BLUR's CAVE OF GUIDES ON FLASHING AND USING LSJ/LS8/LSD ROMS AND KERNELS + BONUS TOOLS
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=35923600

NeatROM SUPER Lite(developed by salesale, modified by bobdoblo)
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38372709&postcount=34296

Sent from my Galaxy S2 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Lol, you're well proud of it aren't you! :D

Thats about the fifth time you posted it today:D:thumbup:

*NeatROM*
 
  • Like
Reactions: _Sale_, NoRulesForMe and Thisnameisepic
It_ler

It_ler

Recognized Contributor
Aug 23, 2011
12,504
17,301
Samsung Galaxy S8
Samsung Galaxy S10
It_ler said:
PhilZ-touch v4.64:
I flashed PhilZ-touch kernel v4.64 (signed / not the fixed version) on my XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3.
It is very stable and smooth on my phone.
Everything works fine (GPS, wifi, bluetooth, camera, video recording, gallery, video layer, live thumbnails, custom boot animation, etc.).

Excellent battery life in night use.
PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
It's nearly the same as my best result so far (for XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2 on stock/PhilZ kernel too) ... with nearly the same fantastic deep sleep ratio.
If its battery life in mixed usage is also that good, I have to think about staying a while on this kernel.
My phone seems to like this kernel ... fits very good to my personal usage/needs so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

PhilZ-touch v4.64:
Excellent battery life in mixed usage too.
PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 12,6%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
Best results on XWLSD for my normal usage so far.
Will keep a nandrod backup of this system.

Here are some screenshots:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2013-02-25-19-53-19.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-25-19-53-19.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 277
  • Screenshot_2013-02-25-19-53-25.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-25-19-53-25.jpg
    18.9 KB · Views: 277
  • Screenshot_2013-02-25-19-53-31.jpg
    Screenshot_2013-02-25-19-53-31.jpg
    22.3 KB · Views: 272
  • Like
Reactions: _Sale_, NoRulesForMe, Thisnameisepic and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Intratech
[ROM+Guide] Official i9100 Firmwares LPE/Q/7/2/F/S/4/7/G/9/W/D/F Download
Replies
11K
Views
7M
M
mpzyixjkjmttuxnmxa@bvhrs.
codeworkx
[ROM][GT-I9100][JB][4.1.2] CyanogenMod 10 official nightly builds
Replies
23K
Views
7M
AlinTecsan
AlinTecsan
Faryaab
  • Locked
[Stock Official Firmwares] I9100XWMS2 (4.1.2) - Slovenia (MOT) [05-01-14]
Replies
12K
Views
5M
pilotn
pilotn
codeworkx
[ROM][GT-I9100][4.0.4] CyanogenMod 9 nightly builds | DISCUSSION THREAD
Replies
43K
Views
10M
J
JJEgan
droidphile
[REF][TWEAKS] Kernel Governors, Modules, I/O Schedulers, CPU Tweaks, AIO App Configs
Replies
858
Views
1M
know.i.dee
know.i.dee

Top Liked Posts

24 Hours All time
  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 230
    It_ler
    It_ler
    Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / SpeedMod / Apolo / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels

    As I like Samsung/stock ROMs, I try to find the newest/best Sammy ROM as base for my kernel tests.
    My target is to find the best-balanced kernel/ROM combination for good performance (smoothness) and long battery life ... and that without any scripts/tweaks or manual undervolting (UV) / underclocking (UC) etc..
    From time to time, I switch my base ROM and create a new kernel comparison list - you will find older kernel result lists in the following posts.
    In this OP, I will continuously update my latest test results.

    Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" (light) usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, sync (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk/Hangout on – wifi and Skype running if specified.
    For all custom kernels, I was running on the stock ROM specified in brackets.
    For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.
    Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.
    For all kernels, I have changed nothing - just default settings. (Except there is an explicit information for a change in brackets.)

    Last added: Apolo v4.14 (Regular) on XWMS3 NeatROM v5.8 (battery tests and benchmark results)


    Here are my current results:

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
Apolo v4.14 regular: 0,94
Apolo v4.13 regular: 1,01
Apolo v4.10 regular: 1,08
Apolo v4.12 regular: 1,08
Apolo v4.11 regular: 1,12
NeatROM XWLSZ: 1,13
Dorimanx v8.35: 1,14
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
PhilZ v5.10.0: 1,24
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
NeatROM XWMS1: 1,31
NeatROM XWLSW: 1,32
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,35
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
Jeboo v2.2: 1,47
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
NeatROM XWMS2: 1,49
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29

[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.14 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 0,94% per hour, Wifi: 9,7%, Awake: 10,6%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 0,85%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS2 NeatROM Lite v5.6): Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,0%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 0,91%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Wifi: 9,2%, Awake: 10,3%, Screen: 9,1% => loss*(1-screen): 0,98%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Wifi: 9,1%, Awake: 10,2%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 0,98%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,11% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,0%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 1,11% per hour, Wifi: 9,9%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,00%
Apolo v4.11 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 1,12% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,2%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,01%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 1,12% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,01%
NeatROM XWLSZ: Battery loss of 1,13% per hour, Wifi: 9,9%, Awake: 10,8%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,02%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,14% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,03%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWMS1: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,35% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,21%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 8,7%, Awake: 9,7%, Screen: 8,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,26%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
NeatROM XWMS2: Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 9,8%, Awake: 10,7%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,35%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,3%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4): Battery loss of 1,93% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%

[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows  to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)
    Code: 
    [B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
Apolo v4.14 regular: 0,17
Apolo v4.13 regular: 0,18
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): 0,24
Apolo v4.11 regular: 0,36
NeatROM XWMS2: 0,37
Apolo v4.12 regular: 0,40
PhilZ v5.10.0: 0,40
NeatROM XWMS1: 0,41
Apolo v4.10 regular: 0,43
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
Dorimanx v8.35: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,45
NeatROM XWLSZ: 0,47
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,52
XWLSD: 0,53
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSW: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
Jeboo v2.2: 0,63
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63

[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.14 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 0,17% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): Battery loss of 0,18% per hour, Awake: 0,9%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,24% per hour, Awake: 1,2%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS2 NeatROM Lite v5.6): Battery loss of 0,35% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
Apolo v4.13 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,35% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
Apolo v4.11 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 0,36% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
NeatROM XWMS2: Battery loss of 0,37% per hour, Awake: 0,8%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,2%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
NeatROM XWMS1: Battery loss of 0,41% per hour, Awake: 0,9%
Apolo v4.12 regular (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): Battery loss of 0,41% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,43% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,45% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
NeatROM XWLSZ: Battery loss of 0,47% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWMS1 (v5.4): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%


    Benchmarks
    Code: 
    [B]AnTuTu[/B]
Apolo v4.14 (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): 11159
Apolo v4.13 (XWMS2 NeatROM Lite v5.6): 11117
Apolo v4.12 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): 10990
Apolo v4.13 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.4.2): 10983
Apolo v4.13 (XWMS3 NeatROM Lite v5.8): 10933
Apolo v4.11 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): 10848
Apolo v4.12 (XWMS1 NeatROM Lite v5.1): 10824
NeatROM XWMS2: 10564
NeatROM XWMS1: 10527
NeatROM XWLSZ: 10212
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10064
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9929
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9887
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9767
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
NeatROM XWLSW: 9437
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799

    My credits go to:


    Thread rule(s):

    1. General xda rules.

    2. Please no "My is the best ROM/kernel" statements.
    You are all welcome to share your experiences and test results.
    And I accept if you feel that this or that kernel/ROM perfectly fits your individual needs.
    But I don't want that my thread becomes a platform for "my ... is better than yours" discussions.

    3. For optimizing your battery life, please use BetterBatteryStats (BBS) app and post an idle dump of about 4 hours in BBS thread.
    Don't mess this thread with such specific posts containing dump files, screenshots of your battery stats, etc. just for asking what drains your battery and how to optimize it.

    Thanks for your understanding !
    View
    46
    It_ler
    It_ler
    My last Jelly Bean (JB) kernel test results => last JB kernel test results
    My last Ice Cream Sandwich (ICE) kernel test results => last ICS kernel test results
    My last GingerBread (GB) kernel test results => last GB kernel test results


    Current activity: Testing Apolo v4.14 on XWMS3 NeatROM v6.3 Aroma.


    My "kernels-to-test" list:

    Click to expand...
    Click to collapse


    Some FAQs:
    Question: Why has one kernel such good battery test results and the other is worse?

    Answer:
    My "normal" usage is kind of light.
    No gaming, no extensive internet browsing/chatting, nearly no phone calls, no fm radio, no streaming, etc.
    That's why the difference between the kernels are not that big.
    I don't have an explicit reason why the one kernel has such good battery life on my phone and the other has worse results.
    In suspicious cases, I already have re-done the test, and in the second battery cycle, the same kernel can have a little bit different battery life - but in most cases, the results were nearly the same.
    As there are so many influences, even I try to keep all things unchanged, there are some I can not control directly.
    So, the thing is that you flash the kernel on your phone and check it under "your" conditions.


    Question: Why does it take so much time to post new test results?

    Answer:
    As I prefer doing a kind of "real-life" tests, these battery tests take some time to be finished.
    Benchmarks are quickly done.
    Battery stress tests - running heavy operations for a special time and checking the battery consumption - can also be quick.
    But using the phone in a "normal" like every-day way, well ... to get reliable results, this tests have to take more time IMO.
    And I try to use nearly the same period of time for all my mixed usage batters tests, which is about 20 hours.

    Question: What do the different numbers mean?

    Answer:
    Benchmark test numbers = scores / results of the corresponding benchmark app.
    Battery loss of x% per hour:
    Battery power was a% at the beginning of the test and b% at the end, so the battery loss was a-b% during the test. This number would be only "comparable", if all the test are taking exactly the same time. As sometimes the battery test is slightly shorter and sometimes a little bit longer, I "normalize" this battery loss by dividing by the testing time t (in hours).
    So I receive a battery loss x = (a-b) / t in %/hour, which is better comparable for all tests.
    The other numbers are ratios in % for the different phone states/times during the test (Awake time, Screen on time, Deep sleep time, etc. divided by the testing time) - I get these ratios/values from BetterBatteryStats (BBS) app.
    And in mixed usage battery test, I saw a direct relation between screen on time and the battery loss per hour, and as I do not have exactly the same screen on time in all tests, I tried to "normalize" this battery loss per hour by the mentioned formula:
    loss*(1-screen) = battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
    So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.

    Question: What is most important for you/me to "judge" a kernel/ROM?

    Answer:
    1. Real-life experience for stability => does the system work without any issues.
    2. Real-life experience for smoothness => does the system feel smooth and responsive.
    3. Real-life experience for battery life => has the system a good battery life with low battery consumption.
    ...
    4. Customizable => is the system highly customizable for tweaking/change settings/load profiles/etc.
    5. Compatibility => is the system compatible with many popular tools/apps for tweaking/changing settings/applying profiles.
    ...
    6. Benchmarks => has the system good benchmark results with high scores.
    ...
    Maybe I forgot some aspects and every user has a different priority.

    Question: Why is your/my mixed usage such "light"?

    Answer:
    Because this is my "normal" / everyday / real-life usage.
    Sorry about that.
    And for me, it is most important to test my system in real-life usage.
    To be precise: I my real-life usage.
    ...
    If you want some test results for another usage ... maybe your normal usage which seems to be "heavier", then be inspired to start testing different kernels on your phone.
    You are welcome to share your results and experiences.

    Question: What are your settings for better battery life?

    Answer:
    Have a look at this tips collection => http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=16973603
    Nothing more to add.
    I disabled all location services, auto-sync, bluetooth, set to lowest brightness, use a black background, disabled some system apps (such as Social Hub, Games Hub, Music Hub, Samsung Hub, Google+, BBC, Zinio, etc.).
    On GB and ICS, I enabled wifi all the time as I am in a strong wifi area. Since JB, I am using Better Wifi On/Off app to turn wifi off when phone is unplugged and screen off.
    On GB and ICS, I had enabled fast dormancy, as my mobile provider supports it. But since JB I have disabled fast dormancy, as it has worse battery life with a massive fd wakelock.

    Question: What is your xda username and what does it stand for?

    Answer:
    My xda username is "It_ler" = IT (information technology) + underscore + LER (German postfix for personalizing things).
    Get a definition of the meaning of "IT'ler" in German(y) => http://translate.google.de/translat...zenesprachenwiki.de/definition/itler/&act=url

    Question: What apps have you disabled? What are your manual tweaks for better battery life?

    Answer:
    Here I posted a short summary of what I have done manually to get better battery life and a link to my disabled apps (specific for XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0) => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=36229516&postcount=1359, and for XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2 => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37210595&postcount=1705. For stock XWLSD => http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37783486&postcount=1868.

    Question: What autostarts have you disabled?

    Answer:
    I read a lot in the BBS app thread and found two very good advices how to reduce the number of alarms for Maps, GSF and Google Play Sevices. Here I linked to the instruction posts.
    Click to expand...
    Click to collapse

    Usual procedure for testing:

    First, I am searching for a stable, smooth and battery friendly stock ROM.
    Then I try to keep as much unchanged as possible (same apps, settings, connections, Modem/Phone/Baseband, CSC, region, time for nightly use, time for mixed usage, screen on time, etc.) in order to get reliable results which can be reproduced.

    After flashing a new kernel, I do a normal reboot and if I recognize any issue, I wipe cache partition and Dalvik cache in CWM recovery.
    Normally I do not wipe/clear anything for switching kernels, as I do not use any kind of scripts, tweaks, manual UV/UC, etc..
    I test all kernel on its completely default settings => kind of "Out-of-the-box".

    After booting the kernel and having tested all important functions (internet, wifi, synching accounts, root and busybox (BB) check, scrolling, swiping, browsing, etc.), I reboot the phone again and start the benchmark tests.
    Then I shut down the phone and fully charge it to 100%.
    Then I unplug the phone, pull out the battery for some minutes, put it back again and turn on the phone.
    Usually I wait so a while and start the battery test somewhere in the 95-99% ... as I am flashing in the evening, I start directly with the night usage battery test.
    I am using chamonix's BetterBattery Stats (BBS) app to set a custom reference and log all battery stats/wakelocks/alarms/times/etc.
    This will take about 8-10 hours, depending on the start and end time ;)

    This nightly usage is part of the mixed usage battery test too.
    Additionally in the day usage, I try to reproduce the same usage at the same places with nearly the same screen on time of about 2 hours in a time period of about 20 hours.
    Sometimes I have to finish the test some minutes earlier or later, sometimes I have a little bit more or less screen on time, but I really try to keep everything which I can influence directly the same.

    If I recognize some unusual wakelocks or significant differences from previous kernel versions, I do a second battery test in a second battery cycle.
    And once I had to restore the nandroid backup of an older system to come back to my "usual" battery life/consumption and repeat the kernel tests.
    But this is the absolute exception.
    Normally, I do not have any issues switching ROMs and kernels.
    View
    29
    It_ler
    It_ler
    Jelly Bean

    Test results from 03.10.2013: Base ROM was XWLSW (JB)

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
Apolo v4.9 regular: 1,07
Apolo v4.10 regular: 1,08
Apolo v4.8b light: 1,11
Dorimanx v8.35: 1,14
PhilZ v5.08.5: 1,16
PhilZ v5.07.0: 1,17
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
PhilZ v5.10.0: 1,24
Apolo v4.7 light: 1,25
PhilZ v5.06.6: 1,26
Dorimanx v8.20: 1,30
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
NeatROM XWLSW: 1,32
PhilZ v5.09.2: 1,34
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,35
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
Apolo v4.8 light: 1,40
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
Jeboo v2.2: 1,47
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29

[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.9 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,07% per hour, Wifi: 10,3%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 0,96%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,08% per hour, Wifi: 9,2%, Awake: 10,3%, Screen: 9,1% => loss*(1-screen): 0,98%
Apolo v4.8b light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,11% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,00%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,14% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,03%
PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,16% per hour, Wifi: 9,8%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,05%
PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,17% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,05%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 11,6%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,12%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, cfq/slp): Battery loss of 1,25% per hour, Wifi: 9,9%, Awake: 11,2%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,13%
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,26% per hour, Wifi: 9,6%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 9,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,14%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,28% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,15%
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,30% per hour, Wifi: 11,5%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,17%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,20%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,35% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,21%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
Apolo v4.8 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 1,40% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,26%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,3%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%

[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows  to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)
    Code: 
    [B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
PhilZ v5.07.0: 0,28
Apolo v4.9 regular: 0,33
PhilZ v5.08.5: 0,34
PhilZ v5.10.0: 0,40
Apolo v4.8b light: 0,42
Apolo v4.10 regular: 0,43
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
Dorimanx v8.35: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,45
PhilZ v5.09.2: 0,46
Apolo v4.7 light: 0,48
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,52
XWLSD: 0,53
PhilZ v5.06.6: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,56
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSW: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
Apolo v4.8 light: 0,61
Jeboo v2.2: 0,63
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63

[B]Long[/B]
PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,28% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
Apolo v4.9 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,33% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,34% per hour, Awake: 1,2%
Apolo v4.9 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,40% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
Apolo v4.8b light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,42% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Apolo v4.10 regular (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,43% per hour, Awake: 1,0%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,45% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,46% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8, cfq/slp): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
Apolo v4.8 light (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%


    Benchmarks
    Code: 
    [B]AnTuTu v3.x[/B]
Apolo v4.10 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10751
Apolo v4.11 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10648
Apolo v4.9 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10332
Dorimanx v8.35 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 10064
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
PhilZ v5.10.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9929
PhilZ v5.08.5 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9918
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9887
Apolo v4.8 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9837
PhilZ v5.06.6 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9834
PhilZ v5.09.2 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9824
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9767
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
PhilZ v5.07.0 (XWLSW NeatROM Lite v4.8): 9615
NeatROM XWLSW: 9437
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799

    Test results from 11.06.2013: Base ROM was XWLSS (JB)

    Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / SpeedMod / Apolo / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
Apolo v4.6 light: 1,17
Apolo v4.7 light: 1,18
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
PhilZ v5.03.0: 1,25
Apolo v4.7 regular : 1,26
Dorimanx v8.20: 1,30
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
NeatROM XWLSW: 1,32
Dorimanx v8.16: 1,34
PhilZ v5.06.1: 1,38
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
Jeboo v2.2: 1,47
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,49
Jeboo v2.1: 1,52
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29

[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,17% per hour, Wifi: 10,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,05%
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,18% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,06%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,11%
PhilZ v5.03.0 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,25% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,13%
Apolo v4.7 regular (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,26% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,13%
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,30% per hour, Wifi: 11,5%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,17%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,2%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7, sio/zzmoove): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
Dorimanx v8.16 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 10,3%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,20%
PhilZ v5.06.1 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 10,1%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 23,3%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 32,6%, Awake: 14,2%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%

[B](*)[/B] In order to get a value, which allows  to compare test results with different screen on times for mixed usage battery tests, I tried to „normalized“ the battery loss per hour with the following formula:
[U]loss*(1-screen):[/U] battery loss in % (per hours) * (100% - screen on time in %)
So, it would be the battery loss in % (per hour) for the screen off time.
That is how a kernel with the same battery loss per hour will get a better/lower value, if it has more screen on time. (And the other way round.)
    Code: 
    [B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
Apolo v4.7 light: 0,36
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,45
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,52
XWLSD: 0,53
Apolo v4.7 regular: 0,55
Apolo v4.6 light: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
PhilZ v5.03.0: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,56
NeatROM XWLSW: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
Dorimanx v8.20: 0,59
PhilZ v5.06.1: 0,62
Dorimanx v8.16: 0,63
Jeboo v2.2: 0,63
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63

[B]Long[/B]
Apolo v4.7 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,36% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,45% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Apolo v4.7 regular (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
PhilZ v5.03.0 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 1,6%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Apolo v4.6 light (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7, sio/zzmoove): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSW: Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
PhilZ v5.06.1 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,62% per hour, Awake: 1,6%
Dorimanx v8.16 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%


    Benchmarks
    Code: 
    [B]AnTuTu v3.x[/B]
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 10153
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Apolo v4.6 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 10059
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
Apolo v4.7 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9940
PhilZ v5.03.0 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9857
Dorimanx v8.20 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9795
Jeboo v2.2 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9767
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
PhilZ v5.06.1 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9626
NeatROM XWLSW: 9437
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
Dorimanx v8.16 (XWLSS NeatROM Lite v4.7): 9254
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799

    Test results from 09.05.2013: Base ROM was XWLSN (JB)

    Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / SpeedMod / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hour)
PhilZ v4.93.6: 1,20
Dorimanx v8.14: 1,21
NeatROM XWLS8: 1,23
SpeedMod K5-8: 1,24
NeatROM XWLSS: 1,31
Dorimanx v8.13: 1,34
SpeedMod K5-7: 1,37
NeatROM XWLSD: 1,38
XWLS8: 1,39
NeatROM XWLSJ: 1,43
NeatROM XWLSN: 1,47
Siyah v6.0b5: 1,49
Jeboo v2.1: 1,52
XWLSD: 1,53
XXLSJ: 3,29

[B]Long[/B]
PhilZ v4.93.6 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,20% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 10,9%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,08%
Dorimanx v8.14 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,21% per hour, Wifi: 10,0%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,09%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,24% per hour, Wifi: 10,4%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,11%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 1,31% per hour, Wifi: 10,5%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,18%
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 12,4%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,21%
SpeedMod K5-7 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,37% per hour, Wifi: 13,4%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 15,9%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 23,3%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 32,6%, Awake: 14,2%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%
    Code: 
    [B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]
[B]Short[/B] (battery loss in % per hours)
NeatROM XWLS8: 0,44
NeatROM XWLSS: 0,46
PhilZ v4.93.6: 0,47
Dorimanx v8.14: 0,51
Siyah v6.0b5: 0,52
Jeboo v2.1: 0,53
XWLSD: 0,53
NeatROM XWLSD: 0,55
NeatROM XWLSN: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-8: 0,56
SpeedMod K5-7: 0,57
Dorimanx v8.13: 0,58
NeatROM XXLSJ: 0,58
XWLS8: 0,65
XXLSJ: 1,63

[B]Long[/B]
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
NeatROM XWLSS: Battery loss of 0,46% per hour, Awake: 1,5%
PhilZ v4.93.6 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,47% per hour, Awake: 1,4%
Dorimanx v8.14 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, auto-wifi): Battery loss of 0,51% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XWLSN: Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
SpeedMod K5-7 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,57% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, auto-wifi): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1, pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,71% per hour, Awake: 5,0%
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,75% per hour, Awake: 3,5%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 4,7%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%


    Benchmarks
    Code: 
    [B]AnTuTu v3.x[/B]
SpeedMod K5-8 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 10153
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
PhilZ v4.93.6 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9969
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9962
NeatROM XWLSS: 9946
Dorimanx v8.14 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9934
SpeedMod K5-7 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9877
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9821
NeatROM XWLSN: 9711
Dorimanx v8.13 (XWLSN NeatROM Lite v4.6.1): 9677
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799
    View
    18
    It_ler
    It_ler
    Ice Cream Sandwich

    Test results from 16.11.2012: Base ROM was XWLPY (ICS)

    Results for SpeedMod / Phenomenal / Siyah / DreamKernel / Shun Andromeda / Dorimanx / Galaxian/ stock kernels

    As I like Samsung/stock ROMs, I try to find the newest/best Sammy ROM as base for my kernel tests.
    My target is to find the best-balanced kernel/ROM combination for good performance (smoothness) and long battery life ... and that without any scripts/tweaks or manual undervolting (UV) / underclocking (UC) etc..
    From time to time, I switch my base ROM and create a new kernel comparison list - you will find older kernel result lists in the following posts.
    In this OP, I will continuously update my latest test results.

    Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" (light) usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, sync (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk and Skype on.
    For all custom kernels, I was running on ICS XWLPY (stock) ROM. (Except there is an explicit information with a different base ROM in brackets.)
    For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.
    Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.
    For all kernels, I have changed nothing - just default settings. (Except there is an explicit information for a change in brackets.)

    Here are my current results:

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]

Dorimanx v5.92: Battery loss of 1,60% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,5%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,44%
XWLPT (CF-Root XWLPT): Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 1,67% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,49%
Dorimanx v7.15.1: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,1%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,2%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,69% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,52%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,70% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,53%
XWLPY (CF-Root): Battery loss of 1,70% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,53%
Siyah v5.0rc2: Battery loss of 1,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,0%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,54%
Dorimanx v7.13: Battery loss of 1,73% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,3%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,56%
Galaxian: Battery loss of 1,75% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,58%
XWLPM (CF-Root XXLQ5 + XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 1,77% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,5%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,60%
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 1,81% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,62%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 1,81% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,6%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,64%
XWLPD (Google sync): Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,64%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
SpeedMod K3-32: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,7%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,85% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 1,86% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 1,89% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,70%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: Battery loss of 1,90% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XWLPD (Fast Dormancy + XXLPX modem + OXXLPL CSC): Battery loss of 1,90% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Siyah v5.0rc1: Battery loss of 1,93% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%
Siyah v5.0i (vpll): Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,7%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,74%
XWLPX (Pre-Rooted): Battery loss of 1,96% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,9%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,75%
Siyah v5.0i: Battery loss of 2,02% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 82%, Deep sleep: 17,6%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,81%
XWLPM (XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 2,06% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 2,03% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
Dorimanx v7.11: Battery loss of 2,05% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,2%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 2,07% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,9%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLPI (XXLPW modem): Battery loss of 2,14% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,92%
Dorimanx v7.17: Battery loss of 2,18% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,96%
Dorimanx v7.8: Battery loss of 2,18% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,96%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
Siyah v5.0.1: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,08%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%


[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPM (XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 0,74% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 4,6%, Deep sleep: 95%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
Dorimanx v7.13: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPM (CF-Root XXLQ5 + XEULP5 CSC): Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,78% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPY (CF-Root): Battery loss of 0,78% per hour, Awake: 6,7%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,79% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v5.0rc1: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
Siyah v5.0rc2: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
Galaxian: Battery loss of 0,83% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.92: Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX (Pre-Rooted): Battery loss of 0,84% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v7.17: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX (CF-Root XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,2%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v7.15.1: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
SpeedMod K3-32: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 6,0%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v7.11: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
Dorimanx v7.8: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v5.0i: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPT (CF-Root XWLPT): Battery loss of 0,91% per hour, Awake: 5,1%, Deep sleep: 94%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
Siyah v5.0i (vpll): Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 0,97% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPI (XXLPW modem): Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,1%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLPT (CF-Root XXLQ5): Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 6,4%, Deep sleep: 93%
Siyah v5.0.1: Battery loss of 1,00% per hour, Awake: 6,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
Siyah v5.0.1 (vpll): Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 93%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%


    Benchmarks
    Code: 
    [B]Quadrant Standard (best of 3 runs)[/B]

Stock XWLPD: 4257
Stock XWLPF: 4197
Stock XWLP3: 4153
Stock XWLP7: 4131
Stock XWLP8: 4110
Stock XWLPG: 4107
Stock XXLPS: 4100
Stock XXLPQ: 4063
Stock XWLPI: 4060
Stock XWLP4: 4046
Stock XWLPU: 3762
Dorimanx v5.92: 3758
Stock XWLPY: 3746
Dorimanx v7.17: 3743
Dorimanx v7.13: 3734
SpeedMod K3-32: 3713
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 3697
Dorimanx v7.16: 3663
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 3635
Stock XWLPM: 3619
Stock XWLPX: 3607
Siyah v5.0.1: 3599
Stock XWLPT: 3585
Dorimanx v7.11: 3581
Galaxian: 3563
Stock XWLPW: 3515
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 3487
Siyah v5.0rc2: 3469
Siyah v5.0i: 3449
Stock XWLPO: 3442
Siyah v5.0rc1: 3433
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 3425
Phenomenal 6.1: 3351
Dorimanx v7.8: 3369
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 3220


[B]NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs)[/B]

Siyah v5.0rc2: 55,9
Siyah v5.0i (vpll): 55,3
Siyah v5.0.1 (vpll): 55,1
Stock XILA2 kernel: 54,3
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 54,2
Stock XWLPY: 52,3
Stock XWLPW: 52,2
Galaxian: 52,1
Stock XWLPX: 52,1
Stock XWLPT: 52,1
Stock XWLPO: 52,1
Stock XWLPI: 52,1
Stock XWLPG: 52,1
Stock XWLPD: 52,1
Stock XWLP8: 52,1
Stock XWLP7: 52,0
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 51,9
Stock XWLP3: 51,9
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 51,8
Stock XWLPF: 51,8
Siyah v5.0rc1: 51,6
Stock XWLPU: 51,6
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 51,5
Stock XWLPM: 51,4
Stock XXLPQ: 51,3
SpeedMod K3-32: 51,2
Siyah v5.0.1: 51,1
Siyah v5.0i: 51,0
Stock XXLPS: 50,9
Dorimanx v5.92: 50,8
Stock XWLP4: 50,8
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 50,5
Stock XWKK5: 47,8
Stock XWKK2: 47,6
Dorimanx v7.13: 47,2
Dorimanx v7.8: 47,2
Dorimanx v7.11: 46,9
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 46,8
Dorimanx v7.16: 46,5
Dorimanx v7.17: 46,2
Stock XWKL1: 38,1
Phenomenal 6.1: 33,9


[B]Vellamo1 (best of 2 runs)[/B]

Stock XWLPT: 1484
Stock XWLPU: 1467
Stock XWLPX: 1460
Stock XWLPM: 1451
Stock XWLPO: 1450
Phenomenal 6.1: 1438
Stock XXLPS: 1303
Stock XWLP3: 1285
Stock XWLP8: 1281
Stock XWLPD: 1277
Stock XWLP7: 1270
Stock XXLPQ: 1247
Stock XWLPF: 1226
Stock XILA2: 1225
Stock XWLPI: 1219
Stock XWLA4: 1216
Stock XWKL1: 1173
Stock XWKK5: 1160
Stock XWLP4: 1133
Stock XWLPG: 1127
Stock XWKK2: 1080

[B]Vellamo2 (best of 2 runs): HTML5 / Metal[/B]
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 1224 / 413
Galaxian: 1214 / 420
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 1208 / 406
SpeedMod K3-32: 1188 / 412
Stock XWLPW: 1182 / 409
Stock XWLPY: 1163 / 414
Dorimanx v7.17: 1163 / 400
Siyah v5.0i: 1161 / 420
Phenomenal 6.1: 1160 / 400
Dorimanx v7.13: 1156 / 403
Dorimanx v7.16: 1156 / 381
Siyah v5.0.1: 1155 / 421
Siyah v5.0rc2: 1136 / 413
Dorimanx v7.11: 1135 / 402
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 1118 / 413
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 1105 / 396
Dorimanx v7.8: 1101 / 380
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 1086 / 401
Siyah v5.0rc1: 1079 / 382
Dorimanx v5.92: 1075 / 380


[B]Linpack (best of 10 runs): Single / Multi thread[/B]

Stock XWLA4: 57.816 / 93.548
Stock XILA2: 57.302 / 91.667
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 48.152 / 81.403
Stock XWLPD: 47.606 / 81.207
Stock XWLPY: 48.263 / 81.090
Stock XWLPX: 48.070 / 81.012
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 48.375 / 80.779
Stock XWLPT: 48.291 / 80.740
Stock XWLPF: 47.960 / 80.740
Dorimanx v7.16: 48.152 / 80.702
Stock XXLPS: 47.203 / 80.586
Stock XWLP3: 48.015 / 80.317
SpeedMod K3-32: 48.543 / 80.241
Stock XWLP8: 48.152 / 80.203
Galaxian: 47.987 / 80.165
Dorimanx v7.13: 48.125 / 80.089
Phenomenal 6.1: 48.263 / 80.051
Stock XWLPW: 47.257 / 80.051
Stock XXLPQ: 48.208 / 80.013
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 47.987 / 79.748
Stock XWLP4: 47.660 / 79.635
Stock XWLPO: 47.987 / 79.522
Siyah v5.0i: 47.877 / 79.485
Stock XWLPI: 47.606 / 79.373
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 47.987 / 79.186
Stock XWLP7: 48.125 / 79.112
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 48.263 / 78.964
Stock XWLPG: 47.960 / 78.779
Siyah v5.0rc2: 48.347 / 78.632
Dorimanx v5.92: 48.459 / 78.596
Siyah v5.0rc1: 47.905 / 78.486
Stock XWLPM: 48.375 / 78.195
Stock XWLPU: 47.987 / 78.086
Dorimanx v7.17: 48.097 / 77.619
Dorimanx v7.11: 48.180 / 77.299
Dorimanx v7.8: 48.599 / 76.657
Siyah v5.0.1: 48.180 / 75.601


[B]CF-Bench (best of 2 runs): Native / Java / Overall score[/B]

Dorimanx v7.16: 11370 / 3583 / 6697
Dorimanx v5.92: 11426 / 3529 / 6687
Stock XWLA4: 11396 / 3539 / 6681
Dorimanx v7.17: 11340 / 3540 / 6660
Dorimanx v7.8: 11280 / 3503 / 6613
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 11177 / 3541 / 6595
Dorimanx v7.11: 11332 / 3434 / 6593
Dorimanx v7.13: 11312 / 3411 / 6571
Stock XWLPT: 11216 / 3472 / 6569
Stock XWLP8: 11255 / 3397 / 6540
Phenomenal 6.1: 11234 / 3396 / 6531
Stock XWLPD: 11263 / 3372 / 6528
Stock XWLPM: 11231 / 3356 / 6506
Stock XWLPY: 11115 / 3422 / 6499
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 11124 / 3343 / 6455
Stock XWLPX: 11021 / 3370 / 6430
Galaxian: 11017 / 3371 / 6429
SpeedMod K3-32: 11128 / 3296 / 6428
Stock XILA2: 11285 / 3187 / 6426
Stock XWLPO: 11050 / 3332 / 6419
Stock XWLPW: 11075 / 3288 / 6402
Stock XWLP4: 10997 / 3338 / 6401
Siyah v5.0.1: 11049 / 3283 / 6389
Siyah v5.0rc2: 11085 / 3216 / 6363
Stock XWLPU: 11018 / 3260 / 6363
Siyah v5.0i: 10961 / 3258 / 6339
Siyah v5.0rc1: 10821 / 3318 / 6319
Stock XWLPF: 10899 / 3247 / 6307
Stock XWLP3: 10795 / 3212 / 6245
Stock XXLPS: 10791 / 3160 / 6212
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 10851 / 3078 / 6187
Stock XXLPQ: 10862 / 3044 / 6171
Stock XWLPI: 10674 / 3012 / 6076
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 10647 / 2974 / 6043
Stock XWLPG: 10472 / 3002 / 5990
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 10702 / 2787 / 5953
Stock XWLP7: 10354 / 2901 / 5882


[B]AnTuTu (1st run)[/B]

Dorimanx v5.92: 6593
Siyah v5.0rc2: 6583
Stock XWLPT: 6579
Stock XWLPY: 6570
Dorimanx v7.16: 6567
Siyah v4.1.5 (XWLPX): 6513
Stock XWLPU: 6503
Dorimanx v7.8: 6496
Siyah v5.0.1: 6440
Dorimanx v7.11: 6440
Stock XWLPX: 6429
Dorimanx v7.13: 6419
Dorimanx v7.17: 6418
Siyah v5.0i: 6408
Siyah v5.0rc1: 6379
DreamKernel 2.7.5 (XWLPX): 6281
SpeedMod K3-32: 6252
Phenomenal 6.1: 6246
Stock XWLPW: 6241
Stock XWLPF: 6237
Stock XWLPD: 6231
Stock XWLP8: 6217
Galaxian: 6113
Stock XILA2: 6110
Stock XWLP3: 6109
Stock XXLPQ: 6075
Stock XWLA4: 6009
Stock XWLP4: 5941
Stock XXLPS: 5912
Stock XWLPG: 5892
Stock XWLPM: 5890
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0 (XWLPX): 5690
Dorimanx v7.15.1: 5558
Stock XWLPO: 5541
Stock XWLP7: 5496
Stock XWLPI: 5446
Shun Andromeda 2.2.2: 5287

    Test results from 26.10.2012: Base ROM was XWLPX (ICS)

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]

Dorimanx v5.87: Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,0%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 1,51% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,6%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 14,7%, Deep sleep: 85%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
Dorimanx v5.88: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,46%
SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 1,64% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,1%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 1,65% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,7%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,48%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPY): Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,2%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Dorimanx v5.89: Battery loss of 1,68% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,51%
Siyah v4.1.5: Battery loss of 1,69% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,3%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,52%
Dorimanx v5.90: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,58%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 1,76% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 15,9%, Deep sleep: 84%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,59%
Shun Andromeda 2.1.2: Battery loss of 1,78% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,2%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,60%
DreamKernel 2.7.5: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,0%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 1,79% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,5%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,61%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 1,83% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,8%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,65%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 1,86% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,4%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,67%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 1,87% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,68%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 1,89% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,70%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 1,91% per hour, Wifi: 89,1%, Awake: 16,9%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,71%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,94% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,5% => loss*(1-screen): 1,72%
Dorimanx v5.82: Battery loss of 1,98% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 17,2%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,78%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 2,03% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 16,5%, Deep sleep: 83%, Screen: 9,6% => loss*(1-screen): 1,84%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 2,07% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,9%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 2,10% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,0%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 11,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,86%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 2,19% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,6%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,97%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 2,31% per hour, Wifi: 75,8%, Awake: 17,3%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,09%
XILA2: Battery loss of 2,42% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 18,2%, Deep sleep: 81%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,20%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 2,37% per hour, Wifi: 81,9%, Awake: 17,4%, Deep sleep: 82%, Screen: 5,9% => loss*(1-screen): 2,23%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 2,58% per hour, Wifi: 96,1%, Awake: 19,5%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 9,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,35%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 2,71% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 19,7%, Deep sleep: 80%, Screen: 10,7% => loss*(1-screen): 2,42%


[B]Night use (wifi, synch, Talk and Skype on)[/B]

Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme: Battery loss of 0,68% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.87: Battery loss of 0,69% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
Phenomenal 6.1 Extreme (XWLPY): Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.88: Battery loss of 0,72% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
SpeedMod K3-31: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,0%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPO: Battery loss of 0,73% per hour, Awake: 5,5%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPT: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 4,6%, Deep sleep: 95%
XWLPM: Battery loss of 0,77% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Siyah v4.1.5: Battery loss of 0,78% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPX: Battery loss of 0,79% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
Shun Andromeda 2.1.2: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,4%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPW: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 6,3%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPD: Battery loss of 0,80% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.89: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 5,7%, Deep sleep: 94%
DreamKernel 2.7.5: Battery loss of 0,81% per hour, Awake: 6,1%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPI: Battery loss of 0,82% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 94%
XWLPU: Battery loss of 0,85% per hour, Awake: 5,3%, Deep sleep: 94%
Shun Andromeda 2.2.0: Battery loss of 0,86% per hour, Awake: 5,8%, Deep sleep: 94%
Dorimanx v5.90: Battery loss of 0,87% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
Dorimanx v5.82: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,2%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLP3: Battery loss of 0,89% per hour, Awake: 6,6%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPY: Battery loss of 0,90% per hour, Awake: 5,9%, Deep sleep: 93%
XXLPQ: Battery loss of 0,92% per hour, Awake: 7,0%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLA4: Battery loss of 0,95% per hour, Awake: 9,2%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLP8: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 7,2%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWLP7: Battery loss of 0,96% per hour, Awake: 6,8%, Deep sleep: 90%
XWLPF: Battery loss of 0,97% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 93%
XWLPG: Battery loss of 0,99% per hour, Awake: 7,1%, Deep sleep: 92%
XWLP4: Battery loss of 1,01% per hour, Awake: 7,7%, Deep sleep: 91%
XXLPS: Battery loss of 1,05% per hour, Awake: 7,6%, Deep sleep: 91%
XILA2: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 6,5%, Deep sleep: 91%
XWKK5: Battery loss of 1,09% per hour, Awake: 11,6%, Deep sleep: 88%
XWKK2: Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Awake: 9,9%, Deep sleep: 89%
    View
    17
    It_ler
    It_ler
    Jelly Bean

    Test results from 29.03.2013: Base ROM was XWLSD (JB)

    Results for Siyah / Jeboo / SpeedMod / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage[/B]

NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,32% per hour, Wifi: 12,6%, Awake: 11,4%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,19%
PhilZ-touch v4.35 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 15,7%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
PhilZ-touch v4.76 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 12,6%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
PhilZ-touch v4.31 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,42% per hour, Wifi: 14,0%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,28%
Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 20,4%, Awake: 12,7%, Screen: 10,3% => loss*(1-screen): 1,28%
SpeedMod K5-3 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 14,3%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 16,1%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 9,7% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,3%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
Jeboo v2.0 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,50% per hour, Wifi: 14,1%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,35%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,51% per hour, Wifi: 14,2%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 18,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 20,8%, Awake: 13,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
SpeedMod K5-2 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,54% per hour, Wifi: 15,8%, Awake: 12,6%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 1,56% per hour, Wifi: 18,6%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%


[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]

NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
PhilZ-touch v4.64 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,48% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
SpeedMod K5-3 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3, Pegasusq): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Jeboo v2.1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,3%
XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Siyah v6.0b5 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLSD: Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
PhilZ-touch v4.76 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,56% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
PhilZ-touch v4.35 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
SpeedMod K5-1 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Jeboo v2.0 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
PhilZ-touch v4.31 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
NeatROM XWLSJ: Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v1.3b (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,63% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
SpeedMod K5-2 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,5%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%


    Benchmarks
    Code: 
    [B]AnTuTu v3.x (1st run)[/B]
SpeedMod K5-3 (XWLSD NeatROM Lite v4.3): 10095
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
NeatROM XWLSD: 9399
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248
NeatROM XWLSJ: 8799

    Test results from 05.02.2013: Base ROM was XWLS8 (JB)

    Results for Siyah / Jeboo / DorimanX / PhilZ-touch / stock kernels

    As I like Samsung/stock ROMs, I try to find the newest/best Sammy ROM as base for my kernel tests.
    My target is to find the best-balanced kernel/ROM combination for good performance (smoothness) and long battery life ... and that without any scripts/tweaks or manual undervolting (UV) / underclocking (UC) etc..
    From time to time, I switch my base ROM and create a new kernel comparison list - you will find older kernel result lists in the following posts.
    In this OP, I will continuously update my latest test results.

    Everything is specific to my phone, my "normal" (light) usage and my home location. Most values are exact results, but some are rounded. I usually have wifi, sync (three email accounts, calendar and news), Google Talk on – wifi and Skype running if specified.
    For all custom kernels, I was running on the stock ROM specified in brackets.
    For stock kernels, I was running on the corresponding stock ROM.
    Always using the Samsung's standard / stock 1650mAh battery.
    For all kernels, I have changed nothing - just default settings. (Except there is an explicit information for a change in brackets.)

    Here are my current results:

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]

NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,23% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 11,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,10%
DorimanX v7.46 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,36% per hour, Wifi: 13,6%, Awake: 11,9%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,22%
PhilZ-touch v4.00b34 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 16,2%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
PhilZ-touch v4.00b34 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,43% per hour, Wifi: 15,7%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
DorimanX v7.47 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 14,4%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v1.3 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
PhilZ-touch v4.01 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,52% per hour, Wifi: 17,0%, Awake: 12,9%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,37%
Siyah v6.0b4 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,53% per hour, Wifi: 15,6%, Awake: 12,8%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,38%
Jeboo v1.2 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,57% per hour, Wifi: 14,5%, Awake: 12,6%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,41%
Jeboo v1.2a (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 1,59% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,43%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%


[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]

NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,44% per hour, Awake: 1,1%
PhilZ-touch v4.00b34 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
PhilZ-touch v4.01 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Siyah v6.0b4 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 2,4%
Jeboo v1.2 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,57% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v1.2a (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
NeatROM XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
DorimanX v7.47 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
DorimanX v7.46 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,61% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
XWLS8: Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
Jeboo v1.3 (XWLS8 NeatROM Lite v4.2): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%

    Benchmarks
    Code: 
    [B]Quadrant Standard (best of 3 runs)[/B]
NeatROM XXLSJ: 4416
Stock XXLSJ: 4337
Stock XWLPD: 4257
Stock XWLPF: 4197
Stock XWLS8: 4175
Stock XWLP3: 4153
Stock XWLP7: 4131
Stock XWLP8: 4110
Stock XWLPG: 4107
Stock XXLPS: 4100
NeatROM XWLS8: 4096
Stock XXLPQ: 4063
Stock XWLPI: 4060
Stock XWLP4: 4046
Stock XWLPU: 3762
Stock XWLPY: 3746
Stock XWLPM: 3619
Stock XWLPX: 3607
Stock XWLPT: 3585
Stock XWLPW: 3515
Stock XWLPO: 3442


[B]NenaMark2 (best of 3 runs)[/B]
Stock XILA2 kernel: 54,3
Stock XWLA4 kernel: 54,2
Stock XWLPY: 52,3
Stock XWLPW: 52,2
Stock XWLPX: 52,1
Stock XWLPT: 52,1
Stock XWLPO: 52,1
Stock XWLPI: 52,1
Stock XWLPG: 52,1
Stock XWLPD: 52,1
Stock XWLP8: 52,1
Stock XWLP7: 52,0
Stock XWLP3: 51,9
Stock XWLPF: 51,8
Stock XWLPU: 51,6
Stock XWLPM: 51,4
Stock XXLPQ: 51,3
Stock XXLPS: 50,9
Stock XWLP4: 50,8
NeatROM XXLSJ: 49,6
Stock XXLSJ: 49,4
NeatROM XWLS8: 49,2
Stock XWLS8: 48,9
Stock XWKK5: 47,8
Stock XWKK2: 47,6
Stock XWKL1: 38,1


[B]Vellamo1 (best of 2 runs)[/B]
Stock XWLPT: 1484
Stock XWLPU: 1467
Stock XWLPX: 1460
Stock XWLPM: 1451
Stock XWLPO: 1450
Stock XXLPS: 1303
Stock XWLP3: 1285
Stock XWLP8: 1281
Stock XWLPD: 1277
Stock XWLP7: 1270
Stock XXLPQ: 1247
Stock XWLPF: 1226
Stock XILA2: 1225
Stock XWLPI: 1219
Stock XWLA4: 1216
Stock XWKL1: 1173
Stock XWKK5: 1160
Stock XWLP4: 1133
Stock XWLPG: 1127
Stock XWKK2: 1080

[B]Vellamo2 (best of 2 runs): HTML5 / Metal[/B]
Stock XWLS8: 1577 / 413
Stock XXLSJ: 1555 / 415
NeatROM XWLS8: 1523 / 398
NeatROM XXLSJ: 1499 / 410
Stock XWLPW: 1182 / 409
Stock XWLPY: 1163 / 414


[B]Linpack (best of 10 runs): Single / Multi thread[/B]
Stock XWLA4: 57.816 / 93.548
Stock XILA2: 57.302 / 91.667
Stock XXLSJ: 48.042 / 81.877
Stock XWLPD: 47.606 / 81.207
Stock XWLPY: 48.263 / 81.090
Stock XWLPX: 48.070 / 81.012
Stock XWLPT: 48.291 / 80.740
Stock XWLPF: 47.960 / 80.740
Stock XXLPS: 47.203 / 80.586
Stock XWLP3: 48.015 / 80.317
NeatROM XXLSJ: 47.525 / 80.279
Stock XWLP8: 48.152 / 80.203
Stock XWLPW: 47.257 / 80.051
Stock XXLPQ: 48.208 / 80.013
NeatROM XWLS8: 47.850 / 79.635
Stock XWLP4: 47.660 / 79.635
Stock XWLPO: 47.987 / 79.522
Stock XWLPI: 47.606 / 79.373
Stock XWLP7: 48.125 / 79.112
Stock XWLPG: 47.960 / 78.779
Stock XWLS8: 47.987 / 78.231
Stock XWLPM: 48.375 / 78.195
Stock XWLPU: 47.987 / 78.086


[B]CF-Bench (best of 2 runs): Native / Java / Overall score[/B]
Stock XWLA4: 11396 / 3539 / 6681
Stock XWLPT: 11216 / 3472 / 6569
Stock XWLP8: 11255 / 3397 / 6540
Stock XWLPD: 11263 / 3372 / 6528
Stock XWLPM: 11231 / 3356 / 6506
Stock XWLPY: 11115 / 3422 / 6499
Stock XWLPX: 11021 / 3370 / 6430
Stock XILA2: 11285 / 3187 / 6426
Stock XWLPO: 11050 / 3332 / 6419
Stock XWLPW: 11075 / 3288 / 6402
Stock XWLP4: 10997 / 3338 / 6401
Stock XWLPU: 11018 / 3260 / 6363
Stock XWLPF: 10899 / 3247 / 6307
Stock XWLP3: 10795 / 3212 / 6245
Stock XXLPS: 10791 / 3160 / 6212
Stock XXLPQ: 10862 / 3044 / 6171
Stock XWLPI: 10674 / 3012 / 6076
Stock XXLSJ: 10422 / 3036 / 5990
Stock XWLPG: 10472 / 3002 / 5990
Stock XWLP7: 10354 / 2901 / 5882
NeatROM XXLSJ: 9758 / 3050 / 5733
Stock XWLS8: 9894 / 2834 / 5658
NeatROM XWLS8: 9474 / 2782 / 5458


[B]AnTuTu (1st run)[/B]
Stock XWLPT: 6579
Stock XWLPY: 6570
Stock XWLPU: 6503
Stock XWLPX: 6429
Stock XXLSJ: 6380
Stock XWLPW: 6241
Stock XWLPF: 6237
Stock XWLPD: 6231
Stock XWLP8: 6217
Stock XILA2: 6110
Stock XWLP3: 6109
Stock XXLPQ: 6075
Stock XWLA4: 6009
Stock XWLP4: 5941
Stock XXLPS: 5912
Stock XWLPG: 5892
Stock XWLPM: 5890
NeatROM XXLSJ: 5797
Stock XWLPO: 5541
Stock XWLP7: 5496
Stock XWLPI: 5446

[B]AnTuTu v3.x (1st run)[/B]
NeatROM XXLSJ: 10064
Stock XWLS8: 9399
NeatROM XWLS8: 9248

    Test results from 24.01.2013: Base ROM was XXLSJ (JB)

    Battery stats
    Code: 
    [B]Mixed (day and night) usage (*)[/B]

Dorimanx v7.38 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,27% per hour, Wifi: 11,9%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,14%
Siyah v6.0b4 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,34% per hour, Wifi: 13,6%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,20%
Jeboo v1.1 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,37% per hour, Wifi: 12,8%, Awake: 11,8%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,23%
Jeboo v1.1f-rebase (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,38% per hour, Wifi: 14,1%, Awake: 12,1%, Screen: 9,8% => loss*(1-screen): 1,24%
Siyah v6.0b3 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,39% per hour, Wifi: 14,3%, Awake: 12,4%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,25%
Dorimanx v7.39 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Wifi: 14,6%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
Jeboo v1.1b (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,44% per hour, Wifi: 14,5%, Awake: 13,3%, Screen: 10,2% => loss*(1-screen): 1,29%
Dorimanx v7.43 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 15,8%, Awake: 12,3%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Jeboo v1.0e (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,45% per hour, Wifi: 14,2%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 1,46% per hour, Wifi: 17,4%, Awake: 13,8%, Screen: 10,1% => loss*(1-screen): 1,31%
Dorimanx v7.40 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,47% per hour, Wifi: 12,8%, Awake: 11,7%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,32%
Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,48% per hour, Wifi: 14,8%, Awake: 12,0%, Screen: 9,9% => loss*(1-screen): 1,33%
Jeboo v1.1a (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,49% per hour, Wifi: 15,0%, Awake: 12,5%, Screen: 10,4% => loss*(1-screen): 1,34%
Jeboo v1.1c (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 1,51% per hour, Wifi: 14,2%, Awake: 12,2%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,36%
NeatROM XXLSJ (FD disabled, Skype on): Battery loss of 1,80% per hour, Wifi: 18,7%, Awake: 18,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 1,62%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 3,29% per hour, Wifi: 100%, Awake: 37,3%, Screen: 10,0% => loss*(1-screen): 2,96%


[B]Night use (mobile data, sync and Talk on)[/B]

Siyah v6.0b4 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,47% per hour, Awake: 2,3%
Jeboo v1.1f-rebase (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,51% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Dorimanx v7.39 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,52% per hour, Awake: 1,6%
Jeboo v1.1b (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Jeboo v1.1c (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,53% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Dorimanx v7.40 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Dorimanx v7.38 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,54% per hour, Awake: 2,4%
Jeboo v1.1d (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 1,9%
Jeboo v1.1 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,55% per hour, Awake: 2,1%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,58% per hour, Awake: 2,2%
Jeboo v1.1a (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,59% per hour, Awake: 2,0%
Dorimanx v7.43 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,62% per hour, Awake: 1,7%
Dorimanx v7.41 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,65% per hour, Awake: 1,8%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD enabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 0,67% per hour, Awake: 4,3%
Jeboo v1.0e (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,69% per hour, Awake: 2,3%
Siyah v6.0b3 (XXLSJ NeatROM Lite v4.0): Battery loss of 0,69% per hour, Awake: 2,7%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi off, FD disabled, Skype on): Battery loss of 1,07% per hour, Awake: 9,8%
XXLSJ: Battery loss of 1,63% per hour, Awake: 20,7%
NeatROM XXLSJ (wifi on – static IP, FD disabled, no Skype): Battery loss of 3,26% per hour, Awake: 44,7%
    View

New posts