Hi all. Im using 1.4 OC but i cand play hd videos. Any can suggest,me a player that do it? Thanks in advance.
Mobo player is what i use to play my stuff. Has hardware decoding options too.
Hi all. Im using 1.4 OC but i cand play hd videos. Any can suggest,me a player that do it? Thanks in advance.
I moved the cpu_speedo_nominal down to 1175. I prefer a decrease, rather than increase in voltage. Then I tried to have all cpu nominals and all core nominals the same so I lowered the core_speedo_nominal down to 1225. Now this way all the cpu nominals are 50mV under the core nominals. Surprise! I got the boot bug with that. A quick reflash solved that and it booted. That's really weird since everything fitted the 50mV rule.
I thought the speedo nominals were "jumpstart" values. I also thought the rail values were the "operating" values. I had the jumpstart values a bit higher because after some trial and error setting the jumpstart values a bit higher than the operating values seemed to work better. I personally call that "jumpstaring it hard". I guess there is no getting around checking every single cpu nominal against every single core nominal value.
Why weren't these inconsistencies a problem in the honeycomb overclock kernel??
PS: to mark something as code put "[ C O D E ]" before and "[ / C O D E ]" after.
BUG_ON(speedo_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_speedo_nominal_millivolts));
tegra2_dvfs_rail_vdd_cpu.nominal_millivolts =
cpu_speedo_nominal_millivolts[speedo_id];
tegra2_dvfs_rail_vdd_aon.nominal_millivolts =
core_speedo_nominal_millivolts[speedo_id];
You get boot freeze after moving cpu_speedo_nominal down to 1175? Then, don't release this change
Then, what if you change the order for settings initial values? it is, instead of cpu, core and aon, better core, aon and cpu:
In the void __init tegra_soc_init_dvfs(void) funcition, just move:
Code:BUG_ON(speedo_id >= ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_speedo_nominal_millivolts)); tegra2_dvfs_rail_vdd_cpu.nominal_millivolts = cpu_speedo_nominal_millivolts[speedo_id];
after this:
Code:tegra2_dvfs_rail_vdd_aon.nominal_millivolts = core_speedo_nominal_millivolts[speedo_id];
I moved the cpu_speedo_nominal down to 1175. I prefer a decrease, rather than increase in voltage. Then I tried to have all cpu nominals and all core nominals the same so I lowered the core_speedo_nominal down to 1225. Now this way all the cpu nominals are 50mV under the core nominals. Surprise! I got the boot bug with that. A quick reflash solved that and it booted. That's really weird since everything fitted the 50mV rule.
I thought the speedo nominals were "jumpstart" values. I also thought the rail values were the "operating" values. I had the jumpstart values a bit higher because after some trial and error setting the jumpstart values a bit higher than the operating values seemed to work better. I personally call that "jumpstaring it hard". I guess there is no getting around checking every single cpu nominal against every single core nominal value.
Why weren't these inconsistencies a problem in the honeycomb overclock kernel??
PS: to mark something as code put "[ C O D E ]" before and "[ / C O D E ]" after.
Ey my friend... version 1.5.4XE gives allways me the boot freeze issue!!! But previous 1.5.4 allways works fine for me... It is suposed that 1.5.4XE and 1.5.4 are exactly the same version but... you sure??? I've checked it several times... Maybe you got the freeze after my last suggested change because you used a incorrect version with XE?
The only thing that has been changed between 1.5.4XE and 1.5.5XE is that cpu_speedo voltage has been moved down to 1175. I meant another change that I made caused it to get the boot freeze when it shouldn't have theoretically because the 50mV rule was followed. That other change did boot after a reflash but that defies all logic. Specifically in the other change I tried to make all cpu nominals (rail and speedo) 1175 and all core nominals (rail and sppedo) 1225. This way I won't have to do a 4 way check to make sure cpu speedo, cpu rail, core speedo, core rail all follow the 50mV rule.
To be honest, my tablet seems to be pretty flexible with voltages.so it's hard for me to fix a problem I don't see. Perhaps by moving the cpu speedo from 1225 to 1175, your tablet isn't jumpstarted hard enough? See a few posts back for what I mean by jumpstarting.
Oh yeah, any guesses as to why copying and pasting the exact voltages from the honeycomb kernel isn't working? I mean, it worked like a dream in honeycomb.
On the newest one ex boots up then freezes and es works for about 5 minutes the freeze that only build that really works with my tab 1.1
Whats the difference between Xe and Se ?
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA Premium HD app
Thanks, Xe means more powerfull - more performance ?
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA Premium HD app
1.5.5 worked for me perfect! This was my results:
1.5.4: never freeze at boot
1.5.4XE: allways freeze at boot
1.5.5XE: never freeze at boot
Thanks!
Enviado desde mi GT-P7510 usando Tapatalk 2
Great to see someone else kernel developing, could be the start of something here... Lol, I wanna give this a try but I think It'll stop 3G working if I flash the 7510 kernel.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2