I missed this app so bad, but now seeing it getting a new life made my day
Sent from my LG-P920
Sent from my LG-P920
Hello
I have trying your software with an application.
After some time, this application does not serve me, so I uninstall it
A new version of this application is out, but now it is impossible for me to reinstall this application (the old version and/or the new).
How can I get it?
Is there anything to remove to prevent this blockage?
And for the third point.. Now why would you want to allow ads in some apps
If they're not intrusive, to support the developers. It's up to you, if you don't want it, don't use it.
I have a question and I honestly mean no disrespect but what does "support the developers" mean? Click on ads? I ask because my understanding is that ad revenue is based on click-through and install rates from ads. I'm curious because I for one have Never intentionally clicked on an ad and find it very difficult to believe that anyone that is rooted and has Xposed installed is actually going to be someone who clicks through ads from inside an app! All of us that use adblockers of whatever type are the ones who will rarely "if ever" click through an ad, why would that change just because we now see ads in apps? Is anyone using this module that wasn't already using a hosts file or adblocker for their browser? I already did. Besides, most people, like myself, will buy premium/donate versions of apps anyway. Pretty much every app I have is a paid version if one is available, the only two apps I have that I see ads in without this module installed are GasBuddy and Wifi Analyzer. I honestly believe that the vast majority of us will not ever be ad revenue producers, regardless if this module is available or not! The Very Few who have managed to install a ton of apps with ads do need to suck it up and quite being cheap bastards, buy the donate version if one is available, "support the developers!" But... like I said, the majority of us will never generate ad revenue and still support the developers! All the drama regarding stopping the development of this module was pointless. As much as it is not worth, just my two cents!
For the two apps I see ads in this module works great! Appreciate the update!
I thought they got a little revenue from the ad being displayed too? Maybe I'm misinformed?
I find quite honorable you feel the worrie if your module is privacy or is not.The reason why I remove MinMinGuard from Github is since I think MinMinGuard is kind of piracy. But now, I figured that MinMinGuard is not my own work. It also include other people's contribution in both code(maybe it's just a little part. but I am very thankful to that help) and translation. So I will make it available on Github again. Everyone can freely build it and remake it. Thanks to all the people here!
ps: Why I think MinMinGuard is piracy is because for some apps like 1weather and accuweather, the difference between pro version and non-pro version is only the ads. That's the main reason make me feel like I was doing piracy.
I find quite honorable you feel the worrie if your module is privacy or is not.
For me it is only a tool, any tool can be used for the good or bad.
If some Apps the only diference in pay or free is to have or not ads then the USER should know to dont block those ads...or pay for those.
How ever some apps just over-do with ads where you can even use it without have a popup add in full screen on every click inside the app (yes this exist). this i find terrible and i refuse to keep seeing the add if the dev want to make a quick buck but every 10 secs put a full screen ad on my phone.
You create a great tool for filter, who over and who doesent over do.
Also this kind of show the odity that Linux is. The plataform is free, was born to be supported by the comunity for free...but people want to make money now and to "keep free" they use ads (and most over use).
Good to see its back, we user will use your amazing tool with maturity to only enable on intrusive ones
I can't give you a complete answer because I don't have it - you can search yourself for that, I'm sure there is more detailed information around the Internet. In short, though, and this might depend on the ad provider, you usually get paid a small amount just for displaying ads.I have a question and I honestly mean no disrespect but what does "support the developers" mean? Click on ads? I ask because my understanding is that ad revenue is based on click-through and install rates from ads. I'm curious because I for one have Never intentionally clicked on an ad and find it very difficult to believe that anyone that is rooted and has Xposed installed is actually going to be someone who clicks through ads from inside an app! All of us that use adblockers of whatever type are the ones who will rarely "if ever" click through an ad, why would that change just because we now see ads in apps? Is anyone using this module that wasn't already using a hosts file or adblocker for their browser? I already did. Besides, most people, like myself, will buy premium/donate versions of apps anyway. Pretty much every app I have is a paid version if one is available, the only two apps I have that I see ads in without this module installed are GasBuddy and Wifi Analyzer. I honestly believe that the vast majority of us will not ever be ad revenue producers, regardless if this module is available or not! The Very Few who have managed to install a ton of apps with ads do need to suck it up and quite being cheap bastards, buy the donate version if one is available, "support the developers!" But... like I said, the majority of us will never generate ad revenue and still support the developers! All the drama regarding stopping the development of this module was pointless. As much as it is not worth, just my two cents!
For the two apps I see ads in this module works great! Appreciate the update!
Has anyone confirmed whether this update is legit? Who is the dev behind the update. I don't believe we know the identity yet. Until then, I'm not going to update.
Just check the GitHub commits. The latest commits are all by the original author.I can't say for certain, but it's working great for me and looks consistent with previous versions.