Originally Posted by SayWhat10
Anker is what, 2600mah? can 100 more really make a difference?
---------- Post added at 03:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:33 PM ----------
You do know that..... at that rate.... you would get about 8/9 hours of screen on time right?off stock battery /Anker +100. Guess our phones are just defective
My anker batteries are 2500 mah. Zoom.in on the pic i posted of the batteries and you will see this.
I wish 8 or 9 hours :what: but that is not realistic. Think has something to do with the anker wall.charger charging past the typical usb charger amount.
I am not claiming to always get these amounts of time but my average is usually 1 day with 3.5 to 4 hours screen on with moderate use. Have seen better and have definitely seen worse. Case in point was yesterday. Got 14 hours with 3 hours screen time. Went to take my wif3 out to lunch and was in an area where there was no lte and for.majority of time 4g was in and out. Over this 2 hour period my % went from 95 to 55 with very light use (15 minutes browsing xda, 3 texts and maybe 5 minutes of phone calls).
This leads me to believe that people having extreme battery consumption are in areas with weak signals or where there phone is constantly hunting for signals. Just my theory but only based on my experience when in low signal areas.
I think why mine has done so well is because my new work location is within a mile of a tower and therefore has a very stable signal for 10+ hours out of the day. Plus, like i said before, the signal at my home has seemed to improve. Now, whether that is because of something at&t has done or the radio in flapjaxx's Rom is better, i couldn't say.
Why haven't you ever posted a screenshot of your terrible results? I am really interested in seeing what you have going on including what kind of signal strength your phone is seeing.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using xda premium
Coming from a Galaxy far, far away!