[ROM][4.0.4][MTD] CyanogenMod 9.0.0 | READ : http://goo.gl/rkEeh

cdesai · Jun 11, 2012

cpgeek said:
I was just reading slashdot and came across this awesome article http://liliputing.com/2012/06/android-is-about-to-get-a-lot-faster-thanks-to-linaro.html about some enterprising individuals who have come up with a way of using the new gcc tool chain and inserting various optimizations into the android kernel and base system that produces a huge positive performance impact. sadly I'm not a programmer (but I am an experienced beta tester and know my way around linux internals) but I think it might be worth having the t3am take a look into patching some of these optimizations into the already AWESOME job they've done with the cm9 p1000 port. Yes, there really is only so much a 2 year old single core 1ghz tablet with 512MB ram can do, but I'm hoping that with some more optimization work such as that brought to us by the linaro team we can squeeze every cpu operation and every bit of ram doing exactly what it should be to make application execution a fast, stable, and hopefully less memory intensive experience.

What do you guys think?

spike1985 said:

+1
We should try everything to make our tablets perform as if they'd up to date...

Click to expand...

Click to collapse

Knew someone would post it, and before you say anything, i already did a build with the toolchain yesterday, nothing else, just the linaro toolchain with the CyanogenMod 9.

First thing - it broke kernel build, had to use a prebuilt kernel.
No big improvements, ran a 0xbench and got a small increment in the score, but then most of the other code is still in review, and using it as it is causes breakage with the proprietary libs.

On a sidenote, i'm doing a build for the kernel changes from humberos' tree, with some fixes, do test it and let me know if anything doesn't work as expected (ofc on the other thread), mostly shouldn't, still being safe, shall merge it after that.

EDIT : DONE, http://get.cm/get/2I9
Flash it, and report back on the discussion thread, shall merge it after that

humberos · Jun 12, 2012

Boot Animation - Freezes

We are getting freezes on boot animation because this:

Code:

<6>[   28.633068] PVR_K:(Error): MMU_Alloc: RA_Alloc of VMArena failed [2512, /home/humberos/bin/android/cm9/kernel/samsung/p1/drivers/gpu/pvr/sgx/mmu.c]
<6>[    28.633251] PVR_K:(Error): MMU_Alloc: Alloc of DevVAddr failed from heap  General ID117440512 [2515, /home/humberos/bin/android/cm9/kernel/samsung/p1/drivers/gpu/pvr/sgx/mmu.c]
<6>[   28.633488] PVR_K:(Error): DevMemoryAlloc ERROR MMU_Alloc [1637, /home/humberos/bin/android/cm9/kernel/samsung/p1/drivers/gpu/pvr/buffer_manager.c]
<6>[   28.633657] PVR_K:(Error): BM_ImportMemory: DevMemoryAlloc(0x200000) failed [2332, /home/humberos/bin/android/cm9/kernel/samsung/p1/drivers/gpu/pvr/buffer_manager.c]
<6>[   28.635661] PVR_K:(Error): AllocMemory: RA_Alloc(0x200000) FAILED [115, /home/humberos/bin/android/cm9/kernel/samsung/p1/drivers/gpu/pvr/buffer_manager.c]
<6>[   28.639917] PVR_K:(Error): BM_Alloc: AllocMemory FAILED [1257, /home/humberos/bin/android/cm9/kernel/samsung/p1/drivers/gpu/pvr/buffer_manager.c]
<6>[   28.640100] PVR_K:(Error): AllocDeviceMem: BM_Alloc Failed [398, /home/humberos/bin/android/cm9/kernel/samsung/p1/drivers/gpu/pvr/devicemem.c]

Memory allocation process....

Greetings from Brazil!

D.O.C · Jun 28, 2012

cdesai said:
So, the Development thread was getting pretty messy, and the other threads are for unofficial builds, i thought i'ld start a new one for the Official builds (including nightlies)

Please read the first two posts of development thread carefully before reporting anything
Dev Thread : http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1385153

IF you flashed a build from get.cm and are having problems, report them here.
Anything you want to discuss about CM9, discuss here.

Keep the Development thread CLEAN, it's not for user discussion.

IF you are having some problem, then use the below form to report (just copy paste it and answer the questions)

What build are you running? (Settings > About Tablet > CyanogenMod Version)

Where did you download it from? (if not from get.cm)

What issue are you facing?

Logcat (http://wiki.cyanogenmod.com/wiki/Logcat)
^ Use a box to keep logcats, or paste it at pastebin.com

Any modifications you've done to the ROM (flashing zip x, theme y, etc.) :

Thread Cleaned once again. Take into consideration that not development posts at this threads only "pollutes it" and makes it hard to keep development. So, it is in you best interest that questions, bugst, request or anything that is not development must go here.

Thread Cleaned.:good:

cdesai · Jul 6, 2012

Good news!

For the first time, our 3.0.x port compiled, and i was able to flash it.

Isn't booting yet, but still a good start.

Thanks for humberos for fixing the battery driver, good job man!

Anyone here got a UART setup with the tab?
We're booting the kernel off kexec, so reboot and you're back to normal.

i'ld modify the charging cable, but i'm sure i won't be able to do it, i'm not at all good at soldering.
If anyone could help, it'ld be great.

The changes can be found on cm gerrit, and the battery driver fix is on humberos github, i'll gerrit it soon.

cdesai · Jul 15, 2012

http://kan.gd/1o7i

Andy · Aug 1, 2012

If we have to clean this thread again, it will be closed.
As the OP states. Do not submit bug reports.
This thread is for the developers to provide updates & information. Not for users to ask questions that are common sense or can be easily answered by using your friend Google.

PAragao · Aug 9, 2012

Hi,
I am trying to get a build that can encrypt my table (GSM p1000) so he can connect to an exchange server with those policies enabled. In another thread someone said that CM9 RC1 was able to do that, however i tried cm-9.0.0-RC1-p1 but it also failed to encrypt (the cm-9-20120803/4-NIGHTLY-p1 nighties simple went into a reboot loop).

Can anyone confirm if any CM9 build (and which one) is able to encrypt?

What happens btw is the following:
It starts the encryption, and quickly does a reboot, and then it goes to the actual encrypt till 100%, then it reboots again and after I insert the pin it says Encryption unsuccessful! But everything is working, no data was lost on internal memory (external card was removed previously), it just did a factory reset:

cdesai · Aug 10, 2012

PAragao said:
Hi,
I am trying to get a build that can encrypt my table (GSM p1000) so he can connect to an exchange server with those policies enabled. In another thread someone said that CM9 RC1 was able to do that, however i tried cm-9.0.0-RC1-p1 but it also failed to encrypt (the cm-9-20120803/4-NIGHTLY-p1 nighties simple went into a reboot loop).

Can anyone confirm if any CM9 build (and which one) is able to encrypt?

What happens btw is the following:
It starts the encryption, and quickly does a reboot, and then it goes to the actual encrypt till 100%, then it reboots again and after I insert the pin it says Encryption unsuccessful! But everything is working, no data was lost on internal memory (external card was removed previously), it just did a factory reset:

Get us logs from the RC build.

I've tried encrypting a few times and it has always succeeded.

paulgerman · Aug 10, 2012

Hi,
How can it get stable? The camera stops working with force close 50% of the times I try to take a picture! And always when I try manual focus.
And the image(preview) resolution in the "camera mode"(photo mode) is veery low(The resulted photos resolution is ok)

cdesai · Aug 10, 2012

paulgerman said:
Hi,
How can it get stable? The camera stops working with force close 50% of the times I try to take a picture! And always when I try manual focus.
And the image(preview) resolution in the "camera mode"(photo mode) is veery low(The resulted photos resolution is ok)

Instead of complaining like this, you should get logs when the force close happens and we could do something about it.

There are no major issues, so why can't it be stable when even the nightly builds aren't broken and work just well.

Sent from my GT-P1000

paulgerman · Aug 10, 2012

cdesai said:
Instead of complaining like this, you should get logs when the force close happens and we could do something about it.

There are no major issues, so why can't it be stable when even the nightly builds aren't broken and work just well.

Sent from my GT-P1000

I just did a logcat after a fresh tab restart. The camera stopped when I did the photo with manual focus. The photo was taken but not saved and then it force closed. I know that the photo was taken because it appeared in the upper right box and then it force closed. After force close it wasn't there anymore.
I attached the txt.

Thank you!

mdalacu · Aug 10, 2012

Hi, I am using the stable release, how can I disable the soft buttons? We have capacitive buttons, so the soft one are a waist of screen space. Right now, I don't have a PC, so I can't search properly, please be gentle...

Hammerfest · Aug 11, 2012

mdalacu said:
Hi, I am using the stable release, how can I disable the soft buttons? We have capacitive buttons, so the soft one are a waist of screen space. Right now, I don't have a PC, so I can't search properly, please be gentle...

Ive asked many times, no (real) answer so far...

If you want to disable the buttons AND deal with a much larger interface you can increase the default DPI from 160 to 240. HOWEVER, aside from making the soft buttons disappear (desired) it will increase the size of everything (implied in increasing the DPI and for me at least, undesired), AND if you are NOT using a Hacked version of the Android Market (Google Play Sex Store) many apps keyed to the 160 DPI will no longer be available.

If you dont mind the larger interface in your effort to get rid of the soft keys, there are quite a few threads here on XDA with "DPI Modified" Market.apk's which you can use to replace the one included in the standard GApps package.

Also seeing as I have had my post with bug reports and logcats deleted (instead of moved...), DO NOT POST BUGS/QUESTIONS HERE, post them... http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1644000 or not at all.

Quote from a mod: "As the OP states. Do not submit bug reports."

marvz098 · Aug 11, 2012

Hi guys what kernel you use in stable cm9?

Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda premium

mr.gibran85 · Aug 11, 2012

can someone give me a link for gapps

Thanx

mdalacu · Aug 11, 2012

Hammerfest said:
Ive asked many times, no (real) answer so far...

If you want to disable the buttons AND deal with a much larger interface you can increase the default DPI from 160 to 240. HOWEVER, aside from making the soft buttons disappear (desired) it will increase the size of everything (implied in increasing the DPI and for me at least, undesired), AND if you are NOT using a Hacked version of the Android Market (Google Play Sex Store) many apps keyed to the 160 DPI will no longer be available.

If you dont mind the larger interface in your effort to get rid of the soft keys, there are quite a few threads here on XDA with "DPI Modified" Market.apk's which you can use to replace the one included in the standard GApps package.

Also seeing as I have had my post with bug reports and logcats deleted (instead of moved...), DO NOT POST BUGS/QUESTIONS HERE, post them... http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1644000 or not at all.

Quote from a mod: "As the OP states. Do not submit bug reports."

I have tried it, but the system ui is FC way to offen, what launcher do you recommend?

cdesai · Aug 11, 2012

Since a stable release has been done, we'll accept bugreports, as long as you give us logs.

Also, please continue discussion in the Discussion thread, and post bugreports there as well, since CM9 will no longer be developed and only critical bug fixes will go in.

Discussion thread: http://goo.gl/YRlJu

Closing this thread, but the discussion thread shall stay open

[ROM][4.0.4][MTD] CyanogenMod 9.0.0 | READ : http://goo.gl/rkEeh

Inactive Recognized Developer

Inactive Recognized Developer

Inactive Recognized Developer / Retired Senior Mod

Inactive Recognized Developer

Inactive Recognized Developer

Retired Forum Moderator

Member

Inactive Recognized Developer

Member

Inactive Recognized Developer

Member

Attachments

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Senior Member

Inactive Recognized Developer

Similar threads

Top Liked Posts