you got it buddy
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
#4 has been better for me with senseless rom in all ways, #5 just felt different and not as smooth.Which kernal is getting better battery life? I am using #5 and it seems to be performing well but I want to make sure I am not missing out on better battery performance with #4. Thanks for any input.
I would be very interested to find out how to fix permissions as I am getting some FC's with some apps as well.
It says "An error occured while attempting to run privileged commands!" when I try to fix permissions.
Any ideas?
If you are running one of Lou's ROMs, ROM Manager's Fix Permissions doesn't work properly. He includes GScript light with his ROMs. In GScript, load a script and choose fix permissions, then run it.
Or, you can go into terminal emulator and run:
su
fix_permissions
Running IncROM with this kernel and when I do a normal reboot angry birds shortcut link does not work and not available in the menu but market still recognizes it as installed...anyone else with this issue?
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Hey Lou, thanks for the great work. HTC Incredible with SLCD here.
Reporting that I just threw IncROM on my phone today, and tried out your #5 kernel. Very high battery consumption and Android System taking up over 50% of my battery. Tried it for about 4 hours before going to your #4 kernel. In less than an hour, I noticed much lower power consumption from Android System.
The battery has held at 96% for over 30 minutes now.
I have not changed any settings from when I was running kernel #5.
I have timers set to ring every 30 minutes so that I check battery usage. Otherwise, I am going through "normal usage" (checking the phone only when I get an email, gvoice sms, or gtalk im notification). I am using only 3g and no WiFi. Bluetooth is disabled.
Are most finding that this combo (IncRom and Lou's kernel #4) gets the best battery life with decent speed?
Sorry if i missed this earlier, but has there been any mention of possible improvement on the USB transfer rates for these kernels? #4 gives me the best battery life and #6 helps immensely with emulators, but my transfer rates are typically <1mb/s.
I've noticed when I have Chad's installed, my transfer rate is in the neighborhood of 10-11mb/s; however the battery life is considerably less than Lou's.
Not trying to knock on either here, both Chad and Lou do great work, and I'm not smart enough to build a kernel myself, but what is causing such a dramatic difference in the transfer rates? I don't need it daily, but if I'm having to transfer several gb of data via USB (no access to SD card reader), its faster to flash Chad's, transfer the data, and reflash #6.
</rant>
BTW keep up the good work, Lou!
So I've researching kernel options for my wife's DInc and I keep seeing Lou's kernels getting mentioned (especially lately) but can someone clarify for me (in layman's terms) what the following features for this kernel mean:
- BFS Scheduler
- HTC Boot Performance Enabled
- HTC Performance Profiles Enabled
- CIFS Support (Modular)
- TUN Support (Modular)
- Ext4 Support (Modular)
I know from my novice Ubuntu experience that Ext4 is a format option for internal/external storage but is this a benefit to Android? or with this ROM?
Right now the DInc is running Virtuous 3.1 w/ Virtuous custom kernel v3 & SetCPU installed.
does anyone have a mirror for this kernel?
HeyItsLou Custom Sense Kernel #7
many thanks, Brian