noobSU
Senior Member
True. Even if i'm a big xposed fan. I always find a performance boost after completely uninstalling & removing the framework.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 4
hey guys, when i try to install xposed framework i come up with this
exec :no such file or directory .Can you help me asap??
What makes you think that it is related to Xposed? It seems totally unrelated to me. You could check if you have installed a module which tweaks the Phone app, but the framework itself shouldn't cause such effects.
I installed only xposed and gravity, when this happened. Could be one or another, but I unistalled gravity and the issue was still there. C3076 says its probably xposed. I dont know if is xposed or gravity that could mess with wake up screen during or after call
exec no such file or directory
I had a look at it. The error message mentioned that the function dvmChangeStatus couldn't be found. Well, actually it is there, but Asus has added an additional boolean parameter to it (which has never existed in AOSP). Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to find out what it does when all I have is this:
Assember doesn't have variable names and such nice things. What I did find out was that it enables a different mode for locking (i.e. telling other threads that they shouldn't do certain things right now). Setting it to false should keep the standard behavior.Code:000ca100 <dvmChangeStatus(Thread*, ThreadStatus, bool)>: ca100: 8d 64 24 d4 lea esp,[esp-0x2c] ca104: 89 5c 24 20 mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x20],ebx ca108: 8b 5c 24 30 mov ebx,DWORD PTR [esp+0x30] ca10c: 85 db test ebx,ebx ca10e: 89 74 24 24 mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x24],esi ca112: 89 7c 24 28 mov DWORD PTR [esp+0x28],edi ca116: 8b 74 24 34 mov esi,DWORD PTR [esp+0x34] ca11a: 0f b6 54 24 38 movzx edx,BYTE PTR [esp+0x38] ca11f: 0f 84 a6 00 00 00 je ca1cb <dvmChangeStatus(Thread*, ThreadStatus, bool)+0xcb> ...
But it would be naive to assume that everything works fine just by setting this parameter to false. It's probably part of some bigger change that Asus has done and should be true under circumstance that I don't know. This is a very central part and I spent at least a week debugging and trying around to get this right when I started developing Xposed because I had a bad system stability.
So in short: I think I have to add this ROM to the incompatibility list. Could you give me the full name/version information please? If a new ROM gets rid of this parameter in the future, Xposed should work fine for it.
Could it be that you installed GB through CWM .zip provided by C3CO? It includes an init.d script that replaces app_process.
That would explain a lot. I don't understand why people keep flashing that even when it's available only for my gm2 ROM in my ROM thread. GB thread clearly says zip package is for gm2 rom.
hey guys, when i try to install xposed framework i come up with this
exec :no such file or directory .Can you help me asap??
Sorry, but you are too impatient to get support from me.
It replaces. You can have a look at this one: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=44013064About installing xposed framework i would like to make a flashable zip to install it. I know how to make a basic flashable zip but i do not know what should be changed. Does xposed framework only modify the app_process file or does it replace? is it the only file that is being replaced? If so i could just make a flashable zip that replaces that file?
No, there is something wrong with your ROM.Since I am able to read, I have certainly installed the apk file! And as I told you, since I have reverted to Xposed Framework v2.2 it is going nicely.
So there must be something wrong with 2.3/2.3.1...!?
is there a known compatibility issue with HTC One? The first time, i had to install it via flashing (i found a zip flashable zip someone posted) because any changes i made wouldn't stick after reboots.
Anyone know if this latest version is compatible with the Samsung Galaxy Note 3? I read somewhere that there was a beta that was reportedly working, or an older version that did...but wanted to wait till an official update was out that had support.
TIA!
Anyone know if this latest version is compatible with the Samsung Galaxy Note 3? I read somewhere that there was a beta that was reportedly working, or an older version that did...but wanted to wait till an official update was out that had support.
TIA!
Somehow I can get the files working, but this is not surprising me much because they are very central for the system and I at least wanted to try running them on the Genymotion emulator.
The error message is strange, all that is run there is "busybox mount -o remount,rw /system" (with the BusyBox executable that comes with Xposed). I don't know why it doesn't work on your phone. You can try to simply mount /system writeable yourself. If that doesn't work, I guess you will have to wait until someone builds a flashable zip.
Regarding performance: Yes, I know that some things could be optimized. @exidler has done some great research on this a while ago. However, I need time for this and have to be very careful not to break existing modules or even endanger the system stability. Such low-level changes can lead to very strange effects that are hard to track down.
I'm really curious to discover the options and if necessary rewrite parts of the core. I just didn't find the time yet, there were always other things with more priority and more people waiting for it. Most people don't notice a decrease in performance and even if some do, the question is whether it's really that annoying, compared to the cool features you can get with Xposed. It's everyone's free choice to use or not use Xposed.
I just tried it myself, symlinked /data/data/com.android.providers.downloads/cache to /cache. Works fine for me. You could check the permissions of your /cache folder (ls -ld /cache). For me, it has made drwxrwx--x (771). The directory permissions could have influence on whether Xposed can request file information.