New: XDA launches forum for app developers. Discuss coding, tools, marketing, and more.
XDA Developers Android and Mobile Development Forum
Forgot your password?
 
Post Reply+
Tip us?
 
gnatd
Old
#1  
Junior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 14
Join Date: Jul 2009
Default [Q] Trying to get utility to auto-disable Wifi without wakelock on CM7

Okay, I've been trying to diagnose a somewhat annoying issue. I've been using a fairly simple set of conditions in the Llama utility to automatically disable Wifi when the screen turns off in CM7 to prevent a wakelock condition and reduce battery drain.

So I activate wifi, I reset the log in CPU Spy, and I lock the phone disabling the screen. When I reactivate the phone and check CPU Spy, wifi was definately off but the phone was never in Deep Sleep, so something was holding the wakelock I guess. I repeat the experiment with no changes and Llama still running, but this time I manually disable wifi before locking the screen. This time the phone immediately goes into Deep Sleep according to CPU Spy-- it works perfectly.

So what is the difference between Llama autodisabling and manually disabling wifi that leaves a wakelock active? I've repeated this experiment like ten times last night, and it isn't making much sense to me.

Thanks,

Gnat
 
mikel81
Old
#2  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 1
Posts: 16
Join Date: Feb 2009
I would love an answer to this as well. I can add that with juice defender ultimate the same thing happens. It will disable the wifi but the wakelock stays active. I have tried several settings and reboots and tests and the only thing that would get my phone to deep sleep was disabling JD.
 
gnatd
Old
#3  
Junior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 14
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikel81 View Post
I would love an answer to this as well. I can add that with juice defender ultimate the same thing happens. It will disable the wifi but the wakelock stays active. I have tried several settings and reboots and tests and the only thing that would get my phone to deep sleep was disabling JD.
I can't tell whether this is the exact same, because you make it sound like JD has the wakelock. In my case, Llama is running in both tests, the only difference is whether Llama turns off Wifi or I manually toggle it-- manual toggling puts it into deep sleep even with Llama running.

On the general battery issues on Triumph, one of the more helpful discussions I've seen is this one here-- http://androidforums.com/triumph-all...provement.html. In it a quote from Tickerguy blesses the JuiceDefender approach to throttling data use for battery savings, but I don't think he had done any analysis regarding wakelocks. BTW, I reverted to stock today, and I am finding the exact same problems as CM7-- wifi imposes a wakelock, and Llama can't shut down wifi automatically without the wakelock persisting. I have to manually toggle wifi off before screen off before the wakelock is gone.

Regards,

Gnat
 
mikel81
Old
#4  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 1
Posts: 16
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnatd View Post
I can't tell whether this is the exact same, because you make it sound like JD has the wakelock. In my case, Llama is running in both tests, the only difference is whether Llama turns off Wifi or I manually toggle it-- manual toggling puts it into deep sleep even with Llama running.
Sorry; the wakelock is WLAN. It is almost always active if JD is toggling wifi. I hadn't tried disabling wifi manually but leaving JD active yet. I just tested that and got deep sleep immediately. So it must have something to do with how it disables wifi isn't releasing the wakelock.
 
gnatd
Old
#5  
Junior Member - OP
Thanks Meter 0
Posts: 14
Join Date: Jul 2009
You know, after switching back to stock from CM7 I'm really not sure I'm not happier. With CM7 I was getting worse battery performance, which led me to start obsessing about wakelocks and deep sleep. Now that I am back on stock, I do the same analysis and see that I have the same problems with wakelocks and deep sleep-- but the battery performance is better so it's not that big a deal. I'm sure that there are things I could do to make CM7 have better battery performance-- but I wasn't enjoying the process and wasn't finding answers, so why bother?

It's like power management programs. I ran Green Power for a long time, and had some glitchy problems with being unable to get wifi to turn on even though it wasn't supposed to be managed while the screen was on. Then I disabled it, and you know what... my battery life was good enough to get me through the day. Froyo is good enough to get me through the day.
 
dsmryder
Old
#6  
Junior Member
Thanks Meter 3
Posts: 28
Join Date: Jan 2012

 
DONATE TO ME
The wakelock was put in there on purpose to prevent the phone from hanging when WiFi was on and the phone went to sleep. I use my power widget to turn off WiFi before I turned off the screen unless I'm actually using it.
You could try and build it to see if removing the wakelock is still necessary. If you need help on that side, just post and I'll help. It's not hard, really.

XDA PORTAL POSTS

Dos and Don’ts of Android Design

As long as you’re coming from some type of programming background, the unseen part of app … more

Expand Your Choice of Icons with Icon Themer

Icons are some of the most commonly themed elements of the Android UI, and there is certainly no … more

MicrowaveTimePicker Brings 4.2 TimePicker to 2.1+ Devices

It’s frustrating to see slick new features that you can’t use when … more

What’s Possible with CASUAL & How to Make Your Own CASUAL – XDA Developer TV

XDA Elite Recognized Developer AdamOutler is known … more