I'm saddened to hear this,
dxzh. You have, IMHO, made the most significant contributions to our understanding of the technical side of this issue... and done so in the most fair handed of ways. I can only imagine that you've engaged in your recent dealings with Samsung in the most clear and civil manner possible. If you can't get a decent response from Samsung UK's HQ, I believe it cannot be done.
It appears that Samsung UK is more afraid of Samsung Global than they are concerned about our understanding of what's going on. I shy from the cynicism of the following, but it seems unavoidable: UK management believes that losing loyalty and sales by stonewalling us is better than risking the ire of someone at Global by helping us with honesty and clarity. If crossing this person at Global wouldn't cause heads to roll in retaliation, at a minimum bonuses and promotions would be lost.
To the people at Chertsey reading this, I hope you have another Internet tab open looking for a better job, working for better masters. I have empathy for the dilemma you're in as on the one hand you look to maintain the lifestyle you, your spouse and your children have become accustomed to, while, on the other, you consider the cost to your personal values and your principles... to your beliefs in how to run a good company. I've been there myself. You're not unlike
dxzh in a complementary sort of way, loyal to a vision of a firm you thought was better, an organization you know
could be better, but bewildered about how to make it so.
The people put in a position supposedly to listen to us have been ordered to do nothing in response. The people capable of responding to us have no interest in listening.
And so as the veil of media promotion now gets pulled aside, we see the difference between what Samsung advertises itself to be... and the company it really is.
---------- Post added at 04:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:36 PM ----------
Your heart's in the right place,
Ahmads001!
(I think
artesea's is, too. He was just trying to figure out the mechanism for the lockout... it's a big part of what we do here... and, to be fair, he posted that almost a month ago, on the first day of this debacle, 1246 posts ago.
Keep reading beyond his post #15 and you'll get a fuller picture of
artesea's position on the lockout. And welcome to the forum!!)