[kernel & full source code related]gnu license violation by mmx

Search This thread

premsagar_rs1

Senior Member
Nov 23, 2012
140
64
Hyderabad
i have sent the following mail to license-violation@gnu.org:

Micromax and mediatek have been reluctant in releasing full source code for MICROMAX A110 (MT6577 chipset)
The device name: Micromax A110
name of organisation: Micromax
Email address : info@micromaxinfo.com

Postal cum email address :
Head Office
Micromax House,
90B,Sector-18,Gurgaon
Pin Code - 122015
Tel: +91-124-4811000
Fax: +91-124-4009603
Email: info@micromaxinfo.com

Press Relations
Micromax House,
90B,Sector-18,Gurgaon
Pin Code - 122015
Tel: +91-124-4811000
Fax: +91-124-4009603
Email: info@micromaxinfo.com

Customer Relations
Micromax House,
90B,Sector-18,Gurgaon
Pin Code - 122015
Tel: 18605008286
Fax: +91-124-4009603
Email: info@micromaxinfo.com

Factory
Micromax Informatics Ltd, Plot No.234, HPSIDC Industrial Area,
Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt Solan (HO)-173205


Address of MEDIATEK :

MediaTek India Technology Pvt. Ltd (India)
A 4&5, 3rd Floor, Logix Park, Sector-16, Noida-201301 UP, India

Tel +91-120-434-3900
Fax +91-120-434-3999

NAME OF PACKAGE: FULL SOURCES FOR MICROMAX A110 (MT6577)

BOTH OF THEM ARE VIOLATING BY NOT AT ALL RELEASING THE FULL SOURCES OF MICROMAX A110 (MT6577)

One of the many reponses i have got from micromax on the request of the sources of the above mentioned device is shown in the attachment





THE REPLY WAS THIS:

Thank you for your time. You can learn what to do when you think you
might have discovered a violation by checking out our guide here
<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html>. In short, you need to
gather together the evidence of the violation and provide it to the
copyright holder. If the works involved include FSF-copyrighted programs
(such as GCC, GLIBC or GDB), then you can direct that report here. If
not, you'll need to provide the information to the relevant copyright
holders on the works. Only the copyright holder has the power to enforce
the terms of the license.

Thank you again for your time, and I hope this helps.






now guys what do i have to do i don't get him:confused::rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2014-03-05-12-45-28.png
    Screenshot_2014-03-05-12-45-28.png
    97.2 KB · Views: 526

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 2
    i have sent the following mail to license-violation@gnu.org:

    Micromax and mediatek have been reluctant in releasing full source code for MICROMAX A110 (MT6577 chipset)
    The device name: Micromax A110
    name of organisation: Micromax
    Email address : info@micromaxinfo.com

    Postal cum email address :
    Head Office
    Micromax House,
    90B,Sector-18,Gurgaon
    Pin Code - 122015
    Tel: +91-124-4811000
    Fax: +91-124-4009603
    Email: info@micromaxinfo.com

    Press Relations
    Micromax House,
    90B,Sector-18,Gurgaon
    Pin Code - 122015
    Tel: +91-124-4811000
    Fax: +91-124-4009603
    Email: info@micromaxinfo.com

    Customer Relations
    Micromax House,
    90B,Sector-18,Gurgaon
    Pin Code - 122015
    Tel: 18605008286
    Fax: +91-124-4009603
    Email: info@micromaxinfo.com

    Factory
    Micromax Informatics Ltd, Plot No.234, HPSIDC Industrial Area,
    Tehsil Nalagarh, Distt Solan (HO)-173205


    Address of MEDIATEK :

    MediaTek India Technology Pvt. Ltd (India)
    A 4&5, 3rd Floor, Logix Park, Sector-16, Noida-201301 UP, India

    Tel +91-120-434-3900
    Fax +91-120-434-3999

    NAME OF PACKAGE: FULL SOURCES FOR MICROMAX A110 (MT6577)

    BOTH OF THEM ARE VIOLATING BY NOT AT ALL RELEASING THE FULL SOURCES OF MICROMAX A110 (MT6577)

    One of the many reponses i have got from micromax on the request of the sources of the above mentioned device is shown in the attachment





    THE REPLY WAS THIS:

    Thank you for your time. You can learn what to do when you think you
    might have discovered a violation by checking out our guide here
    <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html>. In short, you need to
    gather together the evidence of the violation and provide it to the
    copyright holder. If the works involved include FSF-copyrighted programs
    (such as GCC, GLIBC or GDB), then you can direct that report here. If
    not, you'll need to provide the information to the relevant copyright
    holders on the works. Only the copyright holder has the power to enforce
    the terms of the license.

    Thank you again for your time, and I hope this helps.






    now guys what do i have to do i don't get him:confused::rolleyes: