Little bit off-topic, but I remember when the minicm10 came out with the .32 kernel, you was happy with the incredible performance. And after a longer test period you always went back to froyopro or minicm7 due the better performance...
Okay, go back to the thread.
@cascabel: you can't find the differences between the o2 and o3 versions of the kernels because the two kernels source code is same, nothing different. The compiler settings is invisible, this is not add or remove features, the difference is only the increased/decreased performance/stability.
If you interested what is the difference and how to work the code optimization in gcc, use google and you can find lot of information about how to work the o2 and o3 optimization, about the strict-aliasing and tons of other optimization flags.
@afi1982: can you post the gcc flags what you used? Or simple changed to -O3 without additional flags? (now playing with the .32 code to build a gb only kernel).
That's true buddy, I did. I had to OC @748 to get similar performance. Everyday usage was better though in Froyo or CM7 @604.
I have to say it is a different ball game today. This kernel / rom combo is really great.
I'm having as much fun with it as I am with my new Xperia E.
