[ROM][4.2.2] 4/5 |OFFICIAL- LiquidSmooth |

Search This thread

thedrizzle

Senior Member
May 12, 2007
1,025
271

Attachments

  • uploadfromtaptalk1360980834206.jpg
    uploadfromtaptalk1360980834206.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 1,317

mtakako

Member
Mar 24, 2010
34
1
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][RC1] LiquidSmooth ROM|per app DPI etc.. |FLOODING|

Amazing rom. Blazing fast. I had found no issue yet with this rom. Most rom that I tried tends to have some BT problem, but not this rom.



Sent from my GT-N7105 using XDA Premium HD app
 
  • Like
Reactions: DAGr8

mtakako

Member
Mar 24, 2010
34
1
Re: [ROM][4.2.2]2/16[RC1] LiquidSmooth |New Kernel in post #2|FLOODING|

Actually I do have some distortion/static noise when connected to BT.. But at least it stay connected for me. Some rom keeps disconnecting the bt.



Sent from my GT-N7105 using XDA Premium HD app
 

digitalcrash

Senior Member
Jan 7, 2011
407
52
Mount Airy
Re: [ROM][4.2.2]2/16[RC1] LiquidSmooth |New Kernel in post #2|FLOODING|

I am still getting the audio issue when using camcorder.

Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
 

shaggyskunk

Recognized Contributor
Nov 22, 2011
19,731
16,043
IDK
Re: [ROM][4.2.2]2/16[RC1] LiquidSmooth |New Kernel in post #2|FLOODING|

DAGr8,
Apologies in advance, if this is a totally stupid question.

I don't know if this is the place to ask this, and I barely understand Linux etc - but I'm wondering what is the thinking behind using ROW / NOOP schedules vs CFQ, AND, I don't even know if this has any bearing on the following....

The reason that I'm asking is;
I understand that quadrant scores are not the only measure of performance, but 4.2.2 roms seem to return lower scores than the 4.1.2 roms, (ie; ~6600 vs ~7500), particularly in comparison to your 02/05 Cherry Pick AOKP rom & I'm running this rom (liquid) with the kernel above at 1900....?

This is the reference that I used.

http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.p...-anticipatory-vs-cfq-vs-deadline-vs-noop.html

I also understand that it's VERY early days for 4.2.2. ;)

Feel free to tell me to get bent ;)



Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:

DAGr8

Inactive Recognized Developer
Feb 27, 2010
3,713
6,309
Montreal
Re: [ROM][4.2.2]2/16[RC1] LiquidSmooth |New Kernel in post #2|FLOODING|

DAGr8,
Apologies in advance, if this is a totally stupid question.

I don't know if this is the place to ask this, and I barely understand Linux etc - but I'm wondering what is the thinking behind using ROW / NOOP schedules vs CFQ, AND, I don't even know if this has any bearing on the following....

The reason that I'm asking is;
I understand that quadrant scores are not the only measure of performance, but 4.2.2 roms seem to return lower scores than the 4.1.2 roms, (ie; ~6600 vs ~7500), particularly in comparison to your 02/05 Cherry Pick AOKP rom & I'm running this rom (liquid) with the kernel above at 1900....?

This is the reference that I used.

http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.p...-anticipatory-vs-cfq-vs-deadline-vs-noop.html

I also understand that it's VERY early days for 4.2.2. ;)

Feel free to tell me to get bent ;)



Sent from my GT-N7105 using Tapatalk 2

Its a question of preference sio always been my personnal favorite ..
I'm contributing to jdkernel so I'll see what I can do but if possible I will add sio .
Also keep in mind each phone /user have there own overall feel .. If bullet is giving you the best results then by all means flash it on top.

Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda premium
 

Top Liked Posts

  • There are no posts matching your filters.
  • 73
    Original OP
    15
    build that willbe posted here will be unofficially supported , I dont mind you guys ask for help in here , just dont expect support for a build that
    A_might not boot
    B_have some random FCs
    etc etc

    for changelogs and stuff go to github and look at framework_base commits that will give you an idea of what was added in the last days .




    some wallpapers..
    9
    new build is up ill update op tomorrow .. just check on goo .
    8
    for those not aware 'nightlies' are available on my androtransfer ... dagr8/liquids
    8
    Agreed! I see you listed CWM as the flashing method in the OP. Is TWRP ok to use?

    I don't want to start any drama considering the circumstances but can anyone briefly tell me what the differences between this and carbon are? The features lists look very similar.

    well as you know carbon tree was forked from liquidsmooth

    since then they went there own way

    since then many things were added in liquid , I wouldnt know if these were kanged from liquid or added to carbon via an other way or if they werent added at all or what was added since then by team carbon .. I do not follow what thy do on there github at all..

    liquidsmooth as there own kernel and so does carbon , afaik each kernel is unique to these specific roms and kernel plays a critical role inhow phone behaves so your best bet is to try them both ...

    I could give you my opinion but ofc im biased ..

    I can tell you one thing for sure when I joined liquidsmooth a few of the 'pub' optimizations were used already but not all of them , this has been corrected so you can expect the maximum smoothnest possible in an oasp based rom .

    I personally got the highest linpack results I ever did before on this rom , 245 (average) @ 1.9ghz .. nugh said .

    now lets not bring up the 'c' word anymore thank you (lol)