"The results indicate that CFS outperformed BFS with minimizing turnaround time but that BFS outperformed CFS for minimizing latency. This indicates that BFS is better for interactive tasks that block on I/O or user input and that CFS is better for batch processing that is CPU bound."
By that definition, it would seem that BFS would be more suited for most users then. How many of us really multitask on this thing, and to what extent. I would surmise that most tasks done on the evo are user oriented interactive tasks. That is, evo's are not used for number crunching in the background. More timeslices for the task at hand rather than background tasks. Of course, if a browsing session is active, enough cpu should still be available for background tasks such as voice, email, texts, etc. Ultimately, it would do people well to try both and see which works best for their individual use.